Paper · 1982 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Control of the Indian Gipsy Moth, (Lymantria Obfuscata Walker) on Apple

Barkha Gupta

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Lymantria obfuscata was recorded by the author as an important pest of apple in the hills of Uttar Pradesh. The effectiveness of several insecticides was evaluated against the eggs and larvae of this insect. Mineral oil based ESSO tree spray oil, IOC tree spray oil and Power oil WSE 7267, all at 3, 6 or 9 per cent and Sandolin A, a dinitro or the cresol preparation, at 1, 2 or 3 per cent proved very effective in reducing the viability of the eggs. Application of 5 per cent dust formulation of insecticides like BHC, aldrin, DDT, heptachlor, chlordane or carbaryl in 30 cm wide and 0.5 cm thick bands on the ground around the trunk of the trees or spraying the trees with 0.05 per cent emulsion of insecticides like diazinon, endosulfan, methyl parathion, dichlorvas, quinalphos or fenitrothion resulted in satisfactory control of the larvae.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lymantria obfuscata was an important apple pest in the hills of Uttar Pradesh.

Interactor
Lymantria obfuscataLymantria obfuscatae0pest
Outcome
important pest of applee0
Setting
hills of Uttar Pradeshe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lymantria obfuscata was recorded by the author as an important pest of apple in the hills of Uttar Pradesh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three mineral oils reduced egg viability.

Treatment
Mineral oil based ESSO tree spray oil, IOC tree spray oil and Power oil WSE 7267, all at 3, 6 or 9 per cente0
Interactor
Lymantria Obfuscata Walkert0pest
Outcome
viability of the eggse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mineral oil based ESSO tree spray oil, IOC tree spray oil and Power oil WSE 7267, all at 3, 6 or 9 per cent and Sandolin A, a dinitro or the cresol preparation, at 1, 2 or 3 per cent proved very effective in reducing the viability of the eggs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lymantria Obfuscata Walker) on Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sandolin A reduced egg viability.

Treatment
Sandolin A, a dinitro or the cresol preparation, at 1, 2 or 3 per cente0
Interactor
Lymantria Obfuscata Walkert0pest
Outcome
viability of the eggse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sandolin A, a dinitro or the cresol preparation, at 1, 2 or 3 per cent proved very effective in reducing the viability of the eggs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lymantria Obfuscata Walker) on Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide dust bands around the trunks satisfactorily controlled larvae.

Treatment
5 per cent dust formulation of insecticides like BHC, aldrin, DDT, heptachlor, chlordane or carbaryle0
Interactor
Lymantria Obfuscata Walkert0pest
Outcome
control of the larvaee0
Direction
satisfactory controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 5 per cent dust formulation of insecticides like BHC, aldrin, DDT, heptachlor, chlordane or carbaryl in 30 cm wide and 0.5 cm thick bands on the ground around the trunk of the trees or spraying the trees with 0.05 per cent emulsion of insecticides like diazinon, endosulfan, methyl parathion, dichlorvas, quinalphos or fenitrothion resulted in satisfactory control of the larvae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lymantria Obfuscata Walker) on Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide emulsion sprays satisfactorily controlled larvae.

Treatment
0.05 per cent emulsion of insecticides like diazinon, endosulfan, methyl parathion, dichlorvas, quinalphos or fenitrothione0
Interactor
Lymantria Obfuscata Walkert0pest
Outcome
control of the larvaee0
Direction
satisfactory controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying the trees with 0.05 per cent emulsion of insecticides like diazinon, endosulfan, methyl parathion, dichlorvas, quinalphos or fenitrothion resulted in satisfactory control of the larvae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lymantria Obfuscata Walker) on Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–71 · show in text ↑

carbaryl · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

quinalphos · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

parathion-methyl · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

diazinon · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

application · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 30 positive, 11 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.