Paper · 2001 · Journal of Crop Production

Nature Farming Practices for Apple Production in Japan

Masao Fujita

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Apples were grown in a study using nature farming practices, including organic fertilizer to supply nutrients, microbial inocu-lants for biocontrol of pest insects, and low- or non-pesticides measures. When low- or non-pesticide measures were adopted, the numbers of pest insects increased accordingly; however, the populations of beneficial organisms and natural predators of pest insects also increased. Even though the reduction in pesticide use caused some fruit damage, the enhanced biocontrol of pest insects by increased numbers of natural predator insects more than compensated for the damage. Thus, low- or non-pesticide nature farming practices were cost-effective because they increased biocontrol of pest insects and decreased the amount of pesticide needed and the cost of application. Key Words: Applemicrobial inoculantnature farmingpest controlorganic fertilization

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing pesticide measures increased pest insect numbers in apples.

Treatment
low- or non-pesticide measurese0
Interactor
pest insectse0pest
Outcome
numbers of pest insectse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When low- or non-pesticide measures were adopted, the numbers of pest insects increased accordingly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–309 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing pesticide measures increased beneficial organisms and natural predators of apple pest insects.

Treatment
low- or non-pesticide measurese1
Interactor
natural predators of pest insectse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
populations of beneficial organisms and natural predators of pest insectse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the populations of beneficial organisms and natural predators of pest insects also increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–413 · show in text ↑
e1

“When low- or non-pesticide measures were adopted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced pesticide use caused some apple fruit damage.

Treatment
reduction in pesticide usee0
Outcome
fruit damagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduction in pesticide use caused some fruit damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–45 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More natural predators increased biocontrol of apple pest insects sufficiently to more than compensate for fruit damage.

Interactor
pest insectse0pest
Second interactor
natural predator insectse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
biocontrol of pest insectse0
Qualifier
increased numbers of natural predator insectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the enhanced biocontrol of pest insects by increased numbers of natural predator insects more than compensated for the damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–45 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low- or non-pesticide nature farming practices were cost-effective for apples.

Outcome
cost-effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low- or non-pesticide nature farming practices were cost-effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low- or non-pesticide practices reduced pesticide quantity and application cost for apples.

Treatment
low- or non-pesticide nature farming practicese1
Outcome
amount of pesticide needed and the cost of applicatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they increased biocontrol of pest insects and decreased the amount of pesticide needed and the cost of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–806 · show in text ↑
e1

“low- or non-pesticide nature farming practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–45 · show in text ↑

insecticide · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.