Abstract
The field study was conducted during kharif season of 2011–12 at Research Farm of Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with eight treatments and three replications. Common dose of RDF (60:30:30 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1) to cotton was applied to all the treatments except control. The results indicated the application of RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.2 per cent B) and remaining N through urea significantly increased organic carbon, available nutrient status in soil, seed cotton and cotton stalk yield and uptake of N, P, K. However, it was found at par with the application of RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.1 per cent B), non boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1) + borax equivalent to 0.1 per cent B and 0.2 per cent B. Hence, it can be concluded that application of RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.1 per cent B) and remaining N through urea was found to be beneficial in respect of increasing soil fertility, nutrient uptake and yield of Bt cotton.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Boronated suphala with 0.2 per cent B and remaining N as urea significantly increased organic carbon.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- application of RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.2 per cent B) and remaining N through ureae0
- Outcome
- organic carbone0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparatorSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the application of RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.2 per cent B) and remaining N through urea significantly increased organic carbon, available nutrient status in soil, seed cotton and cotton stalk yield and uptake of N, P, K”
Claim · model-written summary
Boronated suphala with 0.2 per cent B and remaining N as urea significantly increased available nutrient status in soil.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- application of RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.2 per cent B) and remaining N through ureae0
- Outcome
- available nutrient status in soile0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparatorSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the application of RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.2 per cent B) and remaining N through urea significantly increased organic carbon, available nutrient status in soil, seed cotton and cotton stalk yield and uptake of N, P, K”
Claim · model-written summary
Boronated suphala with 0.2 per cent B and remaining N as urea significantly increased seed cotton.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- application of RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.2 per cent B) and remaining N through ureae0
- Outcome
- seed cottone0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparatorSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the application of RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.2 per cent B) and remaining N through urea significantly increased organic carbon, available nutrient status in soil, seed cotton and cotton stalk yield and uptake of N, P, K”
Claim · model-written summary
Boronated suphala with 0.2 per cent B and remaining N as urea significantly increased cotton stalk yield.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- application of RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.2 per cent B) and remaining N through ureae0
- Outcome
- cotton stalk yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparatorSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the application of RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.2 per cent B) and remaining N through urea significantly increased organic carbon, available nutrient status in soil, seed cotton and cotton stalk yield and uptake of N, P, K”
Claim · model-written summary
Boronated suphala with 0.2 per cent B and remaining N as urea significantly increased uptake of N, P, K.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- application of RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.2 per cent B) and remaining N through ureae0
- Outcome
- uptake of N, P, Ke0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparatorSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the application of RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.2 per cent B) and remaining N through urea significantly increased organic carbon, available nutrient status in soil, seed cotton and cotton stalk yield and uptake of N, P, K”
Claim · model-written summary
The 0.2 per cent B formulation performed at par with the 0.1 per cent B boronated formulation.
- Taxon
- Bt Cottont0
- Treatment
- RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.1 per cent B)e0
- Outcome
- at pare0
- Direction
- at pare0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“it was found at par with the application of RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.1 per cent B)”
t0“Bt Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded that 0.1 per cent B boronated suphala with remaining N as urea was beneficial for soil fertility, nutrient uptake, and cotton yield.
Verbatim
e0“application of RDF through boronated suphala (15:15:15 kg N P2O5 K2O ha−1 + 0.1 per cent B) and remaining N through urea was found to be beneficial in respect of increasing soil fertility, nutrient uptake and yield of Bt cotton”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →potassium · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
93 papers more in this group
See all 97 papers →potassium · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →phosphorus · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →nitrogen · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →potassium · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →fertilization · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →fertilization · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.