Paper · 2005 · Plant Soil and Environment

The antioxidative response of two tomato species with different drought tolerances as a result of drought and cadmium stress combinations

S. Ünyayar; Y. Keleş; F.Ö. Çekiç

14
claims
22
verbatim quotes
90
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The effects of drought, cadmium (Cd) and drought-Cd combinations on antioxidant compounds, antioxidant enzymes and shoot growth were investigated for drought tolerant [Lycopersicon peruvianum (L.) Mill.] and sensitive of (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Lukullus) tomato species. Drought-Cd combinations significantly decreased shoot growth in both species (P < 0.01), drought stress also decreased shoot growth in drought sensitive L. esculentum. Cd was accumulated higher in the roots of drought sensitive L. esculentum than drought tolerant L. peruvianum. The chlorophyll contents decreased in all stress treatments in L. esculentum but did not change in L. peruvianum. Carotenoid contents significantly increased in all stress treatments in both species (P < 0.01). Significant increases in the contents of carotenoids in both species under stress conditions seemed to be associated with a protective role against reactive oxygen species (ROS). Ascorbate (ASC) content decreased during drought stress while increased under Cd stress. Catalase (CAT) and glutathione reductase (GR) activities significantly increased under drought stress in L. peruvianum while decreased in L. esculentum (P < 0.001). Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity decreased under all stress treatments in both species. Drought and Cd stresses increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in both species. The present data did not show a relation between drought tolerance and levels of antioxidative defence system that was induced from Cd. However, there is a clear relationship between Cd uptake and drought tolerance of plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-Cd combinations significantly decreased shoot growth in both tomato species.

Treatment
Drought-Cd combinationse1
Outcome
shoot growthe1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two tomato species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought-Cd combinations significantly decreased shoot growth in both species (P < 0.01), drought stress also decreased shoot growth in drought sensitive L. esculentum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress decreased shoot growth in the drought-sensitive L. esculentum.

Taxon
L. esculentumSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
shoot growthe1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Drought-Cd combinations significantly decreased shoot growth in both species (P < 0.01), drought stress also decreased shoot growth in drought sensitive L. esculentum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–448 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd was accumulated higher in roots of drought-sensitive L. esculentum than in drought-tolerant L. peruvianum.

Taxon
L. esculentumSolanum lycopersicume2
Organ / stage
rootse2
Outcome
Cd was accumulatede2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
drought tolerant L. peruvianume2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Cd was accumulated higher in the roots of drought sensitive L. esculentum than drought tolerant L. peruvianum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll contents decreased in all stress treatments in L. esculentum.

Taxon
L. esculentumSolanum lycopersicume3
Treatment
stress treatmentse3
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The chlorophyll contents decreased in all stress treatments in L. esculentum but did not change in L. peruvianum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll contents did not change in L. peruvianum under stress treatments.

Taxon
L. peruvianumSolanum peruvianume3
Treatment
stress treatmentse3
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse3
Direction
did not changee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“The chlorophyll contents decreased in all stress treatments in L. esculentum but did not change in L. peruvianum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carotenoid contents significantly increased in all stress treatments in both tomato species.

Treatment
stress treatmentse4
Outcome
Carotenoid contentse4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two tomato species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carotenoid contents significantly increased in all stress treatments in both species (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbate content decreased during drought stress in tomato.

Treatment
drought stresse5
Outcome
Ascorbate (ASC) contente5
Direction
decreasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two tomato species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
e5

“Ascorbate (ASC) content decreased during drought stress while increased under Cd stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbate content increased under Cd stress in tomato.

Treatment
Cd stresse5
Outcome
Ascorbate (ASC) contente5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two tomato species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
e5

“Ascorbate (ASC) content decreased during drought stress while increased under Cd stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase and glutathione reductase activities increased under drought stress in L. peruvianum.

Taxon
L. peruvianumSolanum peruvianume6
Treatment
drought stresse6
Outcome
Catalase (CAT) and glutathione reductase (GR) activitiese6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e6

“Catalase (CAT) and glutathione reductase (GR) activities significantly increased under drought stress in L. peruvianum while decreased in L. esculentum (P < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase and glutathione reductase activities decreased under drought stress in L. esculentum.

Taxon
L. esculentumSolanum lycopersicume6
Treatment
drought stresse6
Outcome
Catalase (CAT) and glutathione reductase (GR) activitiese6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Catalase (CAT) and glutathione reductase (GR) activities significantly increased under drought stress in L. peruvianum while decreased in L. esculentum (P < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbate peroxidase activity decreased under all stress treatments in both tomato species.

Treatment
stress treatmentse7
Outcome
Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activitye7
Direction
decreasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two tomato species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
e7

“Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity decreased under all stress treatments in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought and cadmium stresses increased superoxide dismutase activity in both tomato species.

Treatment
Drought and Cd stressese0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD) activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two tomato species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought and Cd stresses increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1381 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The data show no relation between drought tolerance and the Cd-induced antioxidative defence system.

Outcome
a relation between drought tolerance and levels of antioxidative defence systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two tomato species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“The present data did not show a relation between drought tolerance and levels of antioxidative defence system that was induced from Cd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1517 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There is a clear relationship between Cd uptake and drought tolerance of tomato plants.

Outcome
a clear relationship between Cd uptake and drought tolerancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two tomato species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“there is a clear relationship between Cd uptake and drought tolerance of plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1607 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

cadmium atom · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 5 positive, 9 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

39 papers: 17 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

heavy metal · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 4 positive, 10 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

drought · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 27 positive, 115 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.