Abstract
A total of thirty three genotypes of tomato including three checks were analysed in an experiment to determine their tolerance and susceptible levels against drought stress. Four different concentrations of PEG 6000 viz., 4%, 8%, 12% and 16% were used along with control. The genotypic differences investigated were found significant for all the seedling parameters studied. With increasing concentration of PEG growth parameters of seedlings like germination percentage, germination rate, root length, shoot length, root dry weight and shoot dry weight decreased proportionately. Among the parents EC-620428, Arka Saurabh, EC-620360, EC-620427 and EC-620557 exhibited superior performance and among the crosses evaluated EC-620428 × Arka Saurabh, EC-620360 × Arka Saurabh, EC-620427 × EC-620557 responded superior performance compared to other crosses. These genotypes may be used as positive/tolerant controls in future studies. However, the internal physiological investigation is needed for assessing their variable response.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato genotypes differed significantly across all studied seedling parameters.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Material
- genotypice0
- Outcome
- all the seedling parameters studiede0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato Genotypes”
e0“The genotypic differences investigated were found significant for all the seedling parameters studied”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing PEG concentration proportionately reduced seedling germination percentage and rate.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- increasing concentration of PEGe0
- Outcome
- germination percentage, germination ratee0
- Direction
- decreased proportionatelye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato Genotypes”
e0“With increasing concentration of PEG growth parameters of seedlings like germination percentage, germination rate, root length, shoot length, root dry weight and shoot dry weight decreased proportionately”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing PEG concentration proportionately reduced seedling root and shoot lengths.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- increasing concentration of PEGe0
- Outcome
- root length, shoot lengthe0
- Direction
- decreased proportionatelye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato Genotypes”
e0“With increasing concentration of PEG growth parameters of seedlings like germination percentage, germination rate, root length, shoot length, root dry weight and shoot dry weight decreased proportionately”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing PEG concentration proportionately reduced seedling root and shoot dry weights.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- increasing concentration of PEGe0
- Outcome
- root dry weight and shoot dry weighte0
- Direction
- decreased proportionatelye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato Genotypes”
e0“With increasing concentration of PEG growth parameters of seedlings like germination percentage, germination rate, root length, shoot length, root dry weight and shoot dry weight decreased proportionately”
Claim · model-written summary
The listed parent genotypes performed better than other parents under screening.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- EC-620428, Arka Saurabh, EC-620360, EC-620427 and EC-620557e0
- Outcome
- superior performancee0
- Direction
- superiore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato Genotypes”
e0“Among the parents EC-620428, Arka Saurabh, EC-620360, EC-620427 and EC-620557 exhibited superior performance”
Claim · model-written summary
The listed crosses performed better than other crosses under screening.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- EC-620428 × Arka Saurabh, EC-620360 × Arka Saurabh, EC-620427 × EC-620557e0
- Outcome
- superior performancee0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- other crossese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato Genotypes”
e0“among the crosses evaluated EC-620428 × Arka Saurabh, EC-620360 × Arka Saurabh, EC-620427 × EC-620557 responded superior performance compared to other crosses”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors propose these genotypes as positive or tolerant controls in future studies.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Outcome
- positive/tolerant controls in future studiese0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato Genotypes”
e0“These genotypes may be used as positive/tolerant controls in future studies”
The same questions in other papers
drought · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
138 papers more in this group
See all 142 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.