Paper · 2012 · Indian journal of plant protection

Biorational Management of Stem borer, Chilo partellus in Maize

K Rameash; Ashok Kumar; H. Kalita

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the bioefficay of botanical pesticides, entomogenous microbes, insect growth regulators and natural insecticides in the management of stem borer, Chilo partellus in maize. Foliar application of spinosad (0.002%) and emamectin benzoate (0.002%) significantly reduced damage of C. partellus and the bioefficacy of these natural pesticides were found to be on par with that of monocrotophos @ 0.05%. The marginal increase in maize grain yield was in the order of 38.66 and 31.93 per cent, respectively for the treatments spinosad (0.002%) and emamectin benzoate (0.002%) over untreated check.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad significantly reduced C. partellus damage, on par with monocrotophos.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
spinosad (0.002%)e0
Interactor
C. partellusChilo partelluse0pest
Outcome
damage of C. partelluse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
monocrotophos @ 0.05%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of spinosad (0.002%) and emamectin benzoate (0.002%) significantly reduced damage of C. partellus and the bioefficacy of these natural pesticides were found to be on par with that of monocrotophos @ 0.05%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–441 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate significantly reduced C. partellus damage, on par with monocrotophos.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
emamectin benzoate (0.002%)e0
Interactor
C. partellusChilo partelluse0pest
Outcome
damage of C. partelluse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
monocrotophos @ 0.05%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of spinosad (0.002%) and emamectin benzoate (0.002%) significantly reduced damage of C. partellus and the bioefficacy of these natural pesticides were found to be on par with that of monocrotophos @ 0.05%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–441 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad increased maize grain yield by 38.66 per cent over untreated check.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
spinosad (0.002%)e0
Outcome
maize grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
38.66e0
Qualifier
per cente0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The marginal increase in maize grain yield was in the order of 38.66 and 31.93 per cent, respectively for the treatments spinosad (0.002%) and emamectin benzoate (0.002%) over untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate increased maize grain yield by 31.93 per cent over untreated check.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
emamectin benzoate (0.002%)e0
Outcome
maize grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
31.93 per cente0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The marginal increase in maize grain yield was in the order of 38.66 and 31.93 per cent, respectively for the treatments spinosad (0.002%) and emamectin benzoate (0.002%) over untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–634 · show in text ↑

spinosad · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

emamectin benzoate · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

spinosad · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

emamectin benzoate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.