Abstract
A field experiment was conducted in a randomized block design to find out the effective management of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J S Smith) in maize (Zea mays L.) through different insecticides and bio-pesticides during kharif 2019 and 2020 at Agronomy farm, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan. The three sprays of chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC were found most effective treatment against S. frugiperda and gave the better results with maximum reduction of larval population, lowest plant damage (%), lowest leaf damage (%), lowest cob damage (%) and highest grain yield. It is followed by emamectin benzoate 5 SG and found at par at 5th day after each spray. The next effective treatments were spinosad 45 SC, thiodicarb 75 WP, Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and azadirachtin 10000 ppm. The maximum Incremental Benefit Cost Ratio was obtained from the three sprays of emamectin benzoate 5 SG.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Three chlorantraniliprole sprays gave the maximum reduction in fall armyworm larval population.
- Treatment
- three sprays of chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SCe0
- Interactor
- S. frugiperda
.jpg?width=60)
Spodoptera frugiperdae0pest - Outcome
- larval populatione0
- Direction
- maximum reductione0
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The three sprays of chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC were found most effective treatment against S. frugiperda and gave the better results with maximum reduction of larval population”
e1“in maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Three chlorantraniliprole sprays gave the lowest plant, leaf, and cob damage.
- Treatment
- three sprays of chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SCe0
- Interactor
- S. frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
- Outcome
- plant damage (%), lowest leaf damage (%), lowest cob damage (%)e0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The three sprays of chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC were found most effective treatment against S. frugiperda and gave the better results with maximum reduction of larval population, lowest plant damage (%), lowest leaf damage (%), lowest cob damage (%)”
e1“in maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Three chlorantraniliprole sprays gave the highest grain yield.
- Treatment
- three sprays of chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SCe0
- Interactor
- S. frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The three sprays of chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC were found most effective treatment against S. frugiperda and gave the better results with maximum reduction of larval population, lowest plant damage (%), lowest leaf damage (%), lowest cob damage (%) and highest grain yield”
e1“in maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate followed chlorantraniliprole in efficacy and was at par on day five after each spray.
- Treatment
- emamectin benzoate 5 SGe0
- Interactor
- fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae2pest
- Outcome
- found at pare0
- Qualifier
- 5th day after each spraye0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It is followed by emamectin benzoate 5 SG and found at par at 5th day after each spray”
e1“in maize (Zea mays L.)”
e2“fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J S Smith)”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad was among the next effective treatments against fall armyworm.
- Treatment
- spinosad 45 SCe0
- Interactor
- fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae2pest
- Outcome
- next effective treatmentse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The next effective treatments were spinosad 45 SC, thiodicarb 75 WP, Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and azadirachtin 10000 ppm”
e1“in maize (Zea mays L.)”
e2“fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J S Smith)”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiodicarb was among the next effective treatments against fall armyworm.
- Treatment
- thiodicarb 75 WPe0
- Interactor
- fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae2pest
- Outcome
- next effective treatmentse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The next effective treatments were spinosad 45 SC, thiodicarb 75 WP, Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and azadirachtin 10000 ppm”
e1“in maize (Zea mays L.)”
e2“fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J S Smith)”
Claim · model-written summary
Beauveria bassiana was among the next effective treatments against fall armyworm.
- Treatment
- Beauveria bassianae0
- Interactor
- fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae2pest
- Second interactor
- Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- next effective treatmentse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The next effective treatments were spinosad 45 SC, thiodicarb 75 WP, Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and azadirachtin 10000 ppm”
e1“in maize (Zea mays L.)”
e2“fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J S Smith)”
Claim · model-written summary
Metarhizium anisopliae was among the next effective treatments against fall armyworm.
- Treatment
- Metarhizium anisopliaee0
- Interactor
- fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae2pest
- Second interactor
- Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- next effective treatmentse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The next effective treatments were spinosad 45 SC, thiodicarb 75 WP, Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and azadirachtin 10000 ppm”
e1“in maize (Zea mays L.)”
e2“fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J S Smith)”
Claim · model-written summary
Azadirachtin was among the next effective treatments against fall armyworm.
- Treatment
- azadirachtin 10000 ppme0
- Interactor
- fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae2pest
- Outcome
- next effective treatmentse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The next effective treatments were spinosad 45 SC, thiodicarb 75 WP, Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and azadirachtin 10000 ppm”
e1“in maize (Zea mays L.)”
e2“fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J S Smith)”
Claim · model-written summary
Three emamectin benzoate sprays produced the maximum incremental benefit cost ratio.
- Treatment
- three sprays of emamectin benzoate 5 SGe0
- Outcome
- Incremental Benefit Cost Ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum Incremental Benefit Cost Ratio was obtained from the three sprays of emamectin benzoate 5 SG”
e1“in maize (Zea mays L.)”
The same questions in other papers
chlorantraniliprole · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
44 papers more in this group
See all 48 papers →emamectin benzoate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →application · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
625 papers more in this group
See all 629 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.