Abstract
A field experiment was conducted in Typic haplusterts, calcareous soil with objectives to increase rice grain yield and quality parameters using Fe (Iron) chelates under rainfed condition. There were eight treatments inclusive of control (water spray), foliar spraying (FS) with different concentration of two types of iron chelates (L and HEDP L) at active tillering (AT) and panicle initiation stages (PI), foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid at AT and PI, soil application of FeSO4 @ 50 kg ha−1 and FeSO4 @ 25kg ha−1 as enriched FYM replicated thrice in a randomized block design. Foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid resulted in higher yields of grain and straw yields of 3715 and 6564 kg ha−1. It enhanced also the quality parameters viz., starch, amylose, crude protein and true protein in rice grains. The Fe concentration was the highest in processed rice viz., brown, milled and parboiled rice with the same treatment. The findings revealed that foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid, 0.3% Fe chelate L and soil application of enriched FYM were equally effective in increasing the yield of grain, straw and nutritional quality of rice
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 1% FeSO4 plus 0.1% citric acid produced higher grain yield of 3715 kg ha−1.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- Foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acide0
- Outcome
- graine0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3715e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid resulted in higher yields of grain and straw yields of 3715 and 6564 kg ha−1.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
The same foliar treatment produced higher straw yield of 6564 kg ha−1.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acide0
- Outcome
- straw yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 6564 kg ha−1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid resulted in higher yields of grain and straw yields of 3715 and 6564 kg ha−1.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
The foliar treatment enhanced starch, amylose and crude protein in rice grain.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acide1
- Outcome
- starch, amylose, crude proteine0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It enhanced also the quality parameters viz., starch, amylose, crude protein and true protein in rice grains.”
e1“Foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid resulted in higher yields”
Claim · model-written summary
The foliar treatment enhanced true protein in rice grain.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acide1
- Outcome
- true proteine0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It enhanced also the quality parameters viz., starch, amylose, crude protein and true protein in rice grains.”
e1“Foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid resulted in higher yields”
Claim · model-written summary
That treatment gave the highest Fe concentration in brown, milled and parboiled rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Organ / stage
- brown, milled and parboiled ricee0
- Treatment
- Foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acide1
- Outcome
- Fe concentratione0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The Fe concentration was the highest in processed rice viz., brown, milled and parboiled rice with the same treatment.”
e1“Foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid resulted in higher yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 1% FeSO4 plus citric acid was effective in increasing rice grain and straw yield and nutritional quality.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acide0
- Outcome
- yield of grain, straw and nutritional qualitye0
- Direction
- increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid, 0.3% Fe chelate L and soil application of enriched FYM were equally effective in increasing the yield of grain, straw and nutritional quality of rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 0.3% Fe chelate L was equally effective in increasing rice grain and straw yield and nutritional quality.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- 0.3% Fe chelate Le0
- Outcome
- yield of grain, straw and nutritional qualitye0
- Direction
- increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid, 0.3% Fe chelate L and soil application of enriched FYM were equally effective in increasing the yield of grain, straw and nutritional quality of rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil enriched FYM was equally effective in increasing rice grain and straw yield and nutritional quality.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- soil application of enriched FYMe0
- Outcome
- yield of grain, straw and nutritional qualitye0
- Direction
- increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar spraying of 1% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid, 0.3% Fe chelate L and soil application of enriched FYM were equally effective in increasing the yield of grain, straw and nutritional quality of rice”
The same questions in other papers
iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →citric acid · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →iron atom · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
citric acid · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
144 papers more in this group
See all 148 papers →8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.