Paper · 2014 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Carfentrazone and pinoxaden with and without surfactant against grasses and broad-leaf weeds in wheat

S. S. Punia; Dharambir Yadav

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiment to evaluate the bioefficacy of pinoxaden 5 EC in combination with carfentrazone in wheat was conducted in sandy loam soil at CCS HAU Hisar during Rabi seasons of 2008–09 and 2009–10, at Agronomy Research Area of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar. The dominant weeds present in experimental field were little seed canary grass (Phalaris minor Retz.) among grassy weeds and Chenopodium album, Convolvulus arvensis and Melilotus indica among broadleaf weeds. Use of carfentrazone 25 g/ha at 35 DAS and pinoxaden 40 g/ha 7 days after carfentrazone use was not as effective against P.minor as pinoxaden use at 35 days after sowing. Post-emergence use of pinoxaden at 50 g/ha (35 DAS) with sequential use carfentrazone at 25 g/ha (42 DAS) with 1% ammonium sulphate provided complete control grassy and broadleaf weeds without any phytotoxic effect on wheat crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential carfentrazone then pinoxaden controlled P. minor less effectively than pinoxaden at 35 days after sowing.

Treatment
carfentrazone 25 g/ha at 35 DAS and pinoxaden 40 g/ha 7 days after carfentrazone usee0
Interactor
P.minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
P.minore0
Direction
not as effectivee0
Comparator
pinoxaden use at 35 days after sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of carfentrazone 25 g/ha at 35 DAS and pinoxaden 40 g/ha 7 days after carfentrazone use was not as effective against P.minor as pinoxaden use at 35 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden followed by carfentrazone with ammonium sulphate completely controlled grassy and broadleaf weeds.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
pinoxaden at 50 g/ha (35 DAS) with sequential use carfentrazone at 25 g/ha (42 DAS) with 1% ammonium sulphatee0
Outcome
control grassy and broadleaf weedse0
Direction
completee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-emergence use of pinoxaden at 50 g/ha (35 DAS) with sequential use carfentrazone at 25 g/ha (42 DAS) with 1% ammonium sulphate provided complete control grassy and broadleaf weeds without any phytotoxic effect on wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sequential treatment produced no wheat phytotoxicity.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
pinoxaden at 50 g/ha (35 DAS) with sequential use carfentrazone at 25 g/ha (42 DAS) with 1% ammonium sulphatee0
Outcome
phytotoxic effect on wheat crope0
Direction
without anye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-emergence use of pinoxaden at 50 g/ha (35 DAS) with sequential use carfentrazone at 25 g/ha (42 DAS) with 1% ammonium sulphate provided complete control grassy and broadleaf weeds without any phytotoxic effect on wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–875 · show in text ↑

pinoxaden · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

carfentrazone · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

carfentrazone · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pinoxaden · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

carfentrazone · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

pinoxaden · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

ammonium sulfate · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.