Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2005, 2006 and 2007 at Agricultural Research Station, Gulbarga, University of Agricultural Sciences; Dharwad (Karnataka) on shallow black soils to study the effect different crop residues in pigeonpea-based intercropping systems. The treatments comprised of two intercropping systems viz., pigeonpea + pearlmillet and pigeon pea + green gram with 12 different crop residues and fertilizer management. On the basis of 3 year results, pigeonpea + greengram intercropping system recorded significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield (12.11 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (14.15 q/ha), gross returns (Rs. 34,265/ha), net returns (Rs. 26,154/ha) and B: C ratio (3.21) over pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping system (11.37 q/ha, 12.75 q/ha, Rs. 30,616/ha, Rs. 22,667/ha and 2.84, respectively). The seed yield of pigeonpea, pearlmillet and green gram increased significantly due to combined application of crop residues and recommended dose of fertilizers as compared to control. Among the integrated crop residue management practices, application of pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDF recorded significantly higher yield of pigeonpea (13.11 q/ha), pearlmillet (7.53 q/ha), greengram (3.82 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (15.25 q/ha), gross returns (Rs. 36,773/ha), net returns (Rs. 28,160/ha) and B:C ratio (3.26) over other integrated crop residue management practices, but it was found to be on par with application of sorghum stubbles @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDF, sunflower stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDF and 100% pure RDF only.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea plus greengram had significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield than pigeonpea plus pearlmillet.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane0 - Treatment
- pigeonpea + greengrame0
- Outcome
- pigeonpea seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 12.11 q/hae0
- Comparator
- pigeonpea + pearlmillete0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pigeonpea + greengram intercropping system recorded significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield (12.11 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (14.15 q/ha), gross returns (Rs. 34,265/ha), net returns (Rs. 26,154/ha) and B: C ratio (3.21) over pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping system (11.37 q/ha, 12.75 q/ha, Rs. 30,616/ha, Rs. 22,667/ha and 2.84, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea plus greengram had significantly higher pigeonpea equivalent yield than pigeonpea plus pearlmillet.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + greengrame0
- Outcome
- pigeonpea equivalent yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 14.15 q/hae0
- Comparator
- pigeonpea + pearlmillete0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pigeonpea + greengram intercropping system recorded significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield (12.11 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (14.15 q/ha), gross returns (Rs. 34,265/ha), net returns (Rs. 26,154/ha) and B: C ratio (3.21) over pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping system (11.37 q/ha, 12.75 q/ha, Rs. 30,616/ha, Rs. 22,667/ha and 2.84, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea plus greengram had significantly higher gross returns than pigeonpea plus pearlmillet.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + greengrame0
- Outcome
- gross returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs. 34,265/hae0
- Comparator
- pigeonpea + pearlmillete0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pigeonpea + greengram intercropping system recorded significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield (12.11 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (14.15 q/ha), gross returns (Rs. 34,265/ha), net returns (Rs. 26,154/ha) and B: C ratio (3.21) over pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping system (11.37 q/ha, 12.75 q/ha, Rs. 30,616/ha, Rs. 22,667/ha and 2.84, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea plus greengram had significantly higher net returns than pigeonpea plus pearlmillet.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + greengrame0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs. 26,154/hae0
- Comparator
- pigeonpea + pearlmillete0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pigeonpea + greengram intercropping system recorded significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield (12.11 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (14.15 q/ha), gross returns (Rs. 34,265/ha), net returns (Rs. 26,154/ha) and B: C ratio (3.21) over pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping system (11.37 q/ha, 12.75 q/ha, Rs. 30,616/ha, Rs. 22,667/ha and 2.84, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea plus greengram had significantly higher B: C ratio than pigeonpea plus pearlmillet.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + greengrame0
- Outcome
- B: C ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3.21e0
- Comparator
- pigeonpea + pearlmillete0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pigeonpea + greengram intercropping system recorded significantly higher pigeonpea seed yield (12.11 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (14.15 q/ha), gross returns (Rs. 34,265/ha), net returns (Rs. 26,154/ha) and B: C ratio (3.21) over pigeonpea + pearlmillet intercropping system (11.37 q/ha, 12.75 q/ha, Rs. 30,616/ha, Rs. 22,667/ha and 2.84, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined crop residues and recommended fertilizer increased pigeonpea seed yield versus control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- combined application of crop residues and recommended dose of fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The seed yield of pigeonpea, pearlmillet and green gram increased significantly due to combined application of crop residues and recommended dose of fertilizers as compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined crop residues and recommended fertilizer increased pearlmillet seed yield versus control.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanuse0 - Treatment
- combined application of crop residues and recommended dose of fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The seed yield of pigeonpea, pearlmillet and green gram increased significantly due to combined application of crop residues and recommended dose of fertilizers as compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined crop residues and recommended fertilizer increased green gram seed yield versus control.
- Taxon
- green gram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatae0 - Treatment
- combined application of crop residues and recommended dose of fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The seed yield of pigeonpea, pearlmillet and green gram increased significantly due to combined application of crop residues and recommended dose of fertilizers as compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea stalks plus RDF gave significantly higher pigeonpea yield than other residue practices.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 13.11 q/hae0
- Comparator
- other integrated crop residue management practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDF recorded significantly higher yield of pigeonpea (13.11 q/ha), pearlmillet (7.53 q/ha), greengram (3.82 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (15.25 q/ha), gross returns (Rs. 36,773/ha), net returns (Rs. 28,160/ha) and B:C ratio (3.26) over other integrated crop residue management practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea stalks plus RDF gave significantly higher pearlmillet yield than other residue practices.
- Taxon
- pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 7.53 q/hae0
- Comparator
- other integrated crop residue management practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDF recorded significantly higher yield of pigeonpea (13.11 q/ha), pearlmillet (7.53 q/ha), greengram (3.82 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (15.25 q/ha), gross returns (Rs. 36,773/ha), net returns (Rs. 28,160/ha) and B:C ratio (3.26) over other integrated crop residue management practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea stalks plus RDF gave significantly higher greengram yield than other residue practices.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3.82 q/hae0
- Comparator
- other integrated crop residue management practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDF recorded significantly higher yield of pigeonpea (13.11 q/ha), pearlmillet (7.53 q/ha), greengram (3.82 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (15.25 q/ha), gross returns (Rs. 36,773/ha), net returns (Rs. 28,160/ha) and B:C ratio (3.26) over other integrated crop residue management practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea stalks plus RDF gave significantly higher pigeonpea equivalent yield than other residue practices.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- pigeonpea equivalent yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 15.25 q/hae0
- Comparator
- other integrated crop residue management practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDF recorded significantly higher yield of pigeonpea (13.11 q/ha), pearlmillet (7.53 q/ha), greengram (3.82 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (15.25 q/ha), gross returns (Rs. 36,773/ha), net returns (Rs. 28,160/ha) and B:C ratio (3.26) over other integrated crop residue management practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea stalks plus RDF gave significantly higher gross returns than other residue practices.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- gross returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs. 36,773/hae0
- Comparator
- other integrated crop residue management practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDF recorded significantly higher yield of pigeonpea (13.11 q/ha), pearlmillet (7.53 q/ha), greengram (3.82 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (15.25 q/ha), gross returns (Rs. 36,773/ha), net returns (Rs. 28,160/ha) and B:C ratio (3.26) over other integrated crop residue management practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea stalks plus RDF gave significantly higher net returns than other residue practices.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs. 28,160/hae0
- Comparator
- other integrated crop residue management practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDF recorded significantly higher yield of pigeonpea (13.11 q/ha), pearlmillet (7.53 q/ha), greengram (3.82 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (15.25 q/ha), gross returns (Rs. 36,773/ha), net returns (Rs. 28,160/ha) and B:C ratio (3.26) over other integrated crop residue management practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea stalks plus RDF gave significantly higher B:C ratio than other residue practices.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3.26e0
- Comparator
- other integrated crop residue management practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDF recorded significantly higher yield of pigeonpea (13.11 q/ha), pearlmillet (7.53 q/ha), greengram (3.82 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (15.25 q/ha), gross returns (Rs. 36,773/ha), net returns (Rs. 28,160/ha) and B:C ratio (3.26) over other integrated crop residue management practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea stalks plus RDF performed on par with sorghum stubble, sunflower stalk and pure RDF practices.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of pigeonpea stalks @ 5 t/ha + 100% RDF recorded significantly higher yield of pigeonpea (13.11 q/ha), pearlmillet (7.53 q/ha), greengram (3.82 q/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (15.25 q/ha), gross returns (Rs. 36,773/ha), net returns (Rs. 28,160/ha) and B:C ratio (3.26) over other integrated crop residue management practices”
The same questions in other papers
Cajanus cajan · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Cajanus cajan · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →organic · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →organic · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
162 papers more in this group
See all 166 papers →fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
255 papers more in this group
See all 259 papers →fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
371 papers more in this group
See all 375 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.