Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Gulbarga, Karnataka on vertisols during Kharif seasons of 1992-93 and 1993-94 to study the influence of cropping system, row proportions and greengram population levels on yield and yield components of greengram viz., number of seeds pod, number of seeds plant", seed weight plant', number of pods plant', dry matter accumulation in pods plant-1, 100 seed weight and protein content and its yield. Intercropping of greengram with pigeonpea significantly reduced the seed yield of greengram (5.56 q ha) as compared to the sole crop of greengram (11.04 q ha'). Similarly, efffect of intercropping was reflected on all the yield attributes. The protein content of greengram was not influenced by cropping system whereas protein yield was significantly reduced under intercropping when compared to sole cropped greengram. The reduction in the seed yield of greengram under 2:1 was 26 per cent when compared to 2:2 row proportion of pigeonpea and greengram. The protein content of greengram was not sigfnificantly influenced by row proportions while significantly higher protein yield of 1.33 q ha was recorded under 2:2 row proportion. Seed and protein yields were significntly higher under 100 per cent population level of greengram when compared to 50 per cent population level.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping with pigeonpea reduced greengram seed yield from 11.04 to 5.56 q ha.
- Taxon
- greengram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- Intercropping of greengram with pigeonpeae0
- Interactor
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane0other - Outcome
- seed yield of greengrame0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 5.56 q hae0
- Qualifier
- 11.04 q ha'e0
- Comparator
- sole crop of greengrame0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping of greengram with pigeonpea significantly reduced the seed yield of greengram (5.56 q ha) as compared to the sole crop of greengram (11.04 q ha')”
t0“Yield and yield components of greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping also affected all greengram yield attributes.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- all the yield attributese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“efffect of intercropping was reflected on all the yield attributes”
t0“Yield and yield components of greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Cropping system did not influence greengram protein content.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- cropping systeme0
- Outcome
- protein content of greengrame0
- Direction
- not influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The protein content of greengram was not influenced by cropping system”
t0“Yield and yield components of greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping significantly reduced protein yield versus sole cropping.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- protein yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- sole cropped greengrame0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“protein yield was significantly reduced under intercropping when compared to sole cropped greengram”
t0“Yield and yield components of greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
A 2:1 row ratio reduced greengram seed yield by 26 per cent versus 2:2.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- 2:1e0
- Interactor
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0other
- Outcome
- seed yield of greengrame0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 26 per cente0
- Comparator
- 2:2 row proportione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The reduction in the seed yield of greengram under 2:1 was 26 per cent when compared to 2:2 row proportion of pigeonpea and greengram”
t0“Yield and yield components of greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Row proportion had no significant influence on protein content.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- row proportionse0
- Outcome
- protein content of greengrame0
- Direction
- not sigfnificantly influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The protein content of greengram was not sigfnificantly influenced by row proportions”
t0“Yield and yield components of greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Protein yield under 2:2 was significantly higher at 1.33 q ha.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- 2:2 row proportione0
- Outcome
- protein yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.33 q hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher protein yield of 1.33 q ha was recorded under 2:2 row proportion”
t0“Yield and yield components of greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
A full greengram population gave significantly higher seed yield than a half population.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent population level of greengrame0
- Outcome
- Seede0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 50 per cent population levele0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed and protein yields were significntly higher under 100 per cent population level of greengram when compared to 50 per cent population level”
t0“Yield and yield components of greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
A full greengram population gave significantly higher protein yield than a half population.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent population level of greengrame0
- Outcome
- protein yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 50 per cent population levele0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed and protein yields were significntly higher under 100 per cent population level of greengram when compared to 50 per cent population level”
t0“Yield and yield components of greengram”
The same questions in other papers
Cajanus cajan · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Vigna radiata var. radiata · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
16 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →intercropping · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →cultivation system · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.