Paper · 1988 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Studies on Control of Wild Oats (Avena Ludoviciana Dux) in Irrigated Wheat (T. Aesiivum L) with Substituted Urea Herbicides

H. S. Gill; U. S. Walia

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

During 1983–84, all the treatments of isoprcturon and rrmoxuron resulted in significantly superior control of wild oats than methabenzthiazuron. The performance cf isoproturon and mctoxuron was comparable with the wild oats specific herbicide i.e. diclofop at 1.0 kg/ha applied 40 days after sowing. During 1984–85, performance of isoproturon (0.50kg/ha) early post-emergence (wild oats in 1.5 to 2 leaf stage) and of nistoxuron 1.2 kg/ha after first irrigation (wild oats in 2.5 to 3 leaf stage) were found fo be at par with diclofop. These treatments were significantly supeiior to methabeczthiazuron (pre and early post-emergence) with respect to control of wild oats. Highest grain yield was recorded in early post-emergence applicatien of isoproturon 0.50 kg/ha (before first irrigation to the crop) and post-emergence application of metoxuron at 1.2 kg/ha (after first irrigation to the crop).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoprcturon treatments controlled wild oats significantly better than methabenzthiazuron in 1983–84.

Treatment
isoprcturone0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
control of wild oatse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
methabenzthiazurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During 1983–84, all the treatments of isoprcturon and rrmoxuron resulted in significantly superior control of wild oats than methabenzthiazuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rrmoxuron treatments controlled wild oats significantly better than methabenzthiazuron in 1983–84.

Treatment
rrmoxurone0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
control of wild oatse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
methabenzthiazurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During 1983–84, all the treatments of isoprcturon and rrmoxuron resulted in significantly superior control of wild oats than methabenzthiazuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon performed comparably to diclofop for wild oat control.

Treatment
isoproturone0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
diclofop at 1.0 kg/ha applied 40 days after sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance cf isoproturon and mctoxuron was comparable with the wild oats specific herbicide i.e. diclofop at 1.0 kg/ha applied 40 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mctoxuron performed comparably to diclofop for wild oat control.

Treatment
mctoxurone0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
diclofop at 1.0 kg/ha applied 40 days after sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance cf isoproturon and mctoxuron was comparable with the wild oats specific herbicide i.e. diclofop at 1.0 kg/ha applied 40 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early post-emergence isoproturon 0.50kg/ha was at par with diclofop in 1984–85.

Treatment
isoproturon (0.50kg/ha) early post-emergencee0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
diclofope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During 1984–85, performance of isoproturon (0.50kg/ha) early post-emergence (wild oats in 1.5 to 2 leaf stage) and of nistoxuron 1.2 kg/ha after first irrigation (wild oats in 2.5 to 3 leaf stage) were found fo be at par with diclofop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nistoxuron 1.2 kg/ha after first irrigation was at par with diclofop in 1984–85.

Treatment
nistoxuron 1.2 kg/ha after first irrigatione0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
diclofope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During 1984–85, performance of isoproturon (0.50kg/ha) early post-emergence (wild oats in 1.5 to 2 leaf stage) and of nistoxuron 1.2 kg/ha after first irrigation (wild oats in 2.5 to 3 leaf stage) were found fo be at par with diclofop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

These treatments controlled wild oats significantly better than methabeczthiazuron.

Treatment
These treatmentse0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
control of wild oatse0
Direction
supeiiore0
Comparator
methabeczthiazurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments were significantly supeiior to methabeczthiazuron (pre and early post-emergence) with respect to control of wild oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early post-emergence isoproturon 0.50 kg/ha gave the highest wheat grain yield.

Treatment
early post-emergence applicatien of isoproturon 0.50 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield was recorded in early post-emergence applicatien of isoproturon 0.50 kg/ha (before first irrigation to the crop) and post-emergence application of metoxuron at 1.2 kg/ha (after first irrigation to the crop)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence metoxuron 1.2 kg/ha gave the highest wheat grain yield.

Treatment
post-emergence application of metoxuron at 1.2 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield was recorded in early post-emergence applicatien of isoproturon 0.50 kg/ha (before first irrigation to the crop) and post-emergence application of metoxuron at 1.2 kg/ha (after first irrigation to the crop)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

isoproturon · Avena · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

metoxuron · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

herbicide · Avena · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Delaying herbicide application reduced wheat yield and economic benefit.

    Economic Control of Weeds in Wheat,Triticum aestivum · 1988 · compared with diclofop plus bromoxynil at the 2-leaf wheat stage

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.