Paper · 1988 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Influence of Methods of Sowing and Herbicides on Weed Control in Wheat

R. K. Malik; R.S. Panwar; V. M. Bhan

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

F.eld experiments were conducted during 1983–84 and 1984 85 to study the influence of methods of sowing and herbicides on weed control in wheat. Cross row (bidirection) method of sowing reduced the dry matter accumulation by Cliencpi dium album L. The growth of grassy weeds was not affected by method of sowing of wheal, Isoproturon alone at 0–75 kg/ha or 1.0 kg/ha was effective against Phalaiis minor L. Rctz and C. album but not against wild oats and other broadleaf weeds. Sowing wheat in cross row and application of isoproturon alone proved complementary to each other.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross row (bidirectional) sowing reduced dry matter accumulation by the weed Chenopodium album.

Treatment
Cross row (bidirection) method of sowinge0e1
Interactor
Cliencpi dium album Le0e1weed
Outcome
dry matter accumulation by Cliencpi dium album Le0e1
Direction
reducede0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicides on weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cross row (bidirection) method of sowing reduced the dry matter accumulation by Cliencpi dium album L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth of grassy weeds was not affected by the method of sowing of wheat.

Treatment
method of sowinge0e1
Interactor
grassy weedse0e1weed
Outcome
growth of grassy weedse0e1
Direction
no_changeinferrede0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicides on weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“The growth of grassy weeds was not affected by method of sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon alone at 0.75 or 1.0 kg/ha was effective against Phalaris minor and Chenopodium album.

Treatment
Isoproturon alone at 0–75 kg/ha or 1.0 kg/hae0e1
Interactor
Phalaiis minor L. Rctze0e1weed
Second interactor
C. albume0e1weed
Outcome
effectivee0e1
Direction
effectivee0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicides on weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Isoproturon alone at 0–75 kg/ha or 1.0 kg/ha was effective against Phalaiis minor L. Rctz and C. album”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon alone was not effective against wild oats and other broadleaf weeds.

Treatment
Isoproturon alone at 0–75 kg/ha or 1.0 kg/hae0e1
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0e1weed
Second interactor
other broadleaf weedse0e1weed
Outcome
effectivee0e1
Direction
not againste0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicides on weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Isoproturon alone at 0–75 kg/ha or 1.0 kg/ha was effective against Phalaiis minor L. Rctz and C. album but not against wild oats and other broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–476 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross row sowing of wheat and isoproturon alone were complementary to each other.

Treatment
Sowing wheat in cross row and application of isoproturon alonee0e1
Outcome
complementarye0e1
Direction
complementarye0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicides on weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sowing wheat in cross row and application of isoproturon alone proved complementary to each other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–575 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · Avena · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.