Paper · 1990 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Influence of graded doses of nitrogen and isoproturon on the control of weeds in wheat.

P. C. Bhagwati; A. S. Faroda; R. K. Malik

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Population of broad leaf weeds at 60 das (days after sowing) and at harvest decreased with the corresponding increase in nitrogen rates. Isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha+2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha was most effective against weeds but reduced the grain yield of wheat. Isoproturon and surfactant when mixed improved the control of wild oats. The plots treated with isoproturan+ Surfactant (0.75 kg/ha+0.1%) yielded 3937 kg/ha as campared to 3869 kg/ha where isoproturon was applied alone at 1.0 kg/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad leaf weed populations decreased as nitrogen rates increased.

Treatment
increase in nitrogen ratese0
Interactor
broad leaf weedse0weed
Outcome
Population of broad leaf weedse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Population of broad leaf weeds at 60 das (days after sowing) and at harvest decreased with the corresponding increase in nitrogen rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon plus 2,4-D was most effective against weeds.

Treatment
Isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha+2,4-D 0.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha+2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha was most effective against weeds but reduced the grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon plus 2,4-D reduced wheat grain yield.

Treatment
Isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha+2,4-D 0.5 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha+2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha was most effective against weeds but reduced the grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon mixed with surfactant improved wild oat control.

Treatment
Isoproturon and surfactante0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
control of wild oatse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoproturon and surfactant when mixed improved the control of wild oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–318 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon plus surfactant plots yielded 3937 kg/ha versus 3869 kg/ha with isoproturon alone.

Treatment
isoproturan+ Surfactant (0.75 kg/ha+0.1%)e0
Outcome
yieldede0
Value
3937 kg/hae0
Qualifier
3869 kg/hae0
Comparator
isoproturon was applied alone at 1.0 kg/hae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plots treated with isoproturan+ Surfactant (0.75 kg/ha+0.1%) yielded 3937 kg/ha as campared to 3869 kg/ha where isoproturon was applied alone at 1.0 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–478 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 78 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

isoproturon · Avena · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

surfactant · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    The mixture gave similar wheat grain yield to sequential application and weed-free conditions.

    Bio-efficacy of ready-mix formulation of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron for control of mixed weed flora in wheat · 2015 · compared with sequential application of clodinafop 60 g/ha and metsulfuron 4 g/ha and weed free

    No difference from an alternative

  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 64 positive, 2 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

isoproturon · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 72 positive, 2 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

surfactant · Avena · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 27 positive, 14 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.