Abstract

A field experiment to explore the possibility of improving the productivity and sustainability of basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) through organic source was conducted at Karnal during 2004-05 to 2006-07. Rice productivity was at par under inorganic and organic fertilization where farmyard manure (FYM) application was 22.5 t/ha in rice and 20 t/ha or more in wheat. Rice grain-protein content (8.13-8.52%) was at par under all the treatments but the protein yield was significantly higher under inorganic compared to under organic source except under the highest dose (30 tlha in rice and 40 t/ha in wheat) of FYM. Wheat productivity was lower (30.5% on pooled basis) under organic than under inorganic fertilization even under the highest FYM dose. Protein content in wheat increased with increase in the dose of FYM; but the highest pro- tein content (1 1.24%) was recorded under inorganic fertilizer. FYM application for three years significantly im- proved the initial values of soil organic carbon (14.3%), available N (10.7%), P (5.4%) and K (2.6%). Systemis pro- ductivity in terms of rice-equivalent yield was 9.99 t/ha with inorganic fertiliser and 8.88 t/ha with FYM application (30 t/ha in rice and 40 t/ha in wheat). Net returns (Rs 74,170) and benefit : cost ratio (2.1) were significantly higher under inorganic fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice productivity was comparable under inorganic and sufficiently high organic fertilization.

Treatment
farmyard manure (FYM) application was 22.5 t/ha in rice and 20 t/ha or more in wheate0
Outcome
Rice productivitye0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
inorganice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice productivity was at par under inorganic and organic fertilization where farmyard manure (FYM) application was 22.5 t/ha in rice and 20 t/ha or more in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice grain protein content was comparable among treatments.

Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
Rice grain-protein contente0
Direction
at pare0
Value
8.13-8.52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice grain-protein content (8.13-8.52%) was at par under all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice protein yield was higher with inorganic fertilizer except at the highest manure dose.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
inorganice0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
except under the highest dose (30 tlha in rice and 40 t/ha in wheat) of FYMe0
Comparator
organic sourcee0

Verbatim

e0

“the protein yield was significantly higher under inorganic compared to under organic source except under the highest dose (30 tlha in rice and 40 t/ha in wheat) of FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of organic farming on yield, quality and soil-fertility status under basmati rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat productivity was 30.5% lower under organic fertilization than inorganic fertilization.

Treatment
organice0
Outcome
Wheat productivitye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
30.5%e0
Qualifier
even under the highest FYM dosee0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat productivity was lower (30.5% on pooled basis) under organic than under inorganic fertilization even under the highest FYM dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–802 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat protein content increased with manure dose.

Treatment
dose of FYMe0
Outcome
Protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content in wheat increased with increase in the dose of FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer gave the highest wheat protein content, 1 1.24%.

Treatment
inorganic fertilizere0
Outcome
pro- tein contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1 1.24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest pro- tein content (1 1.24%) was recorded under inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of organic farming on yield, quality and soil-fertility status under basmati rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure increased soil organic carbon by 14.3%.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
FYM application for three yearse0
Outcome
soil organic carbone0
Direction
im- provede0
Value
14.3%e0
Comparator
initial valuese0

Verbatim

e0

“FYM application for three years significantly im- proved the initial values of soil organic carbon (14.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of organic farming on yield, quality and soil-fertility status under basmati rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure increased available soil nitrogen by 10.7%.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
FYM application for three yearse0
Outcome
available Ne0
Direction
im- provede0
Value
10.7%e0
Comparator
initial valuese0

Verbatim

e0

“FYM application for three years significantly im- proved the initial values of soil organic carbon (14.3%), available N (10.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of organic farming on yield, quality and soil-fertility status under basmati rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure increased available soil phosphorus by 5.4%.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
FYM application for three yearse0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
im- provede0
Value
5.4%e0
Comparator
initial valuese0

Verbatim

e0

“FYM application for three years significantly im- proved the initial values of soil organic carbon (14.3%), available N (10.7%), P (5.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of organic farming on yield, quality and soil-fertility status under basmati rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure increased available soil potassium by 2.6%.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
FYM application for three yearse0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
im- provede0
Value
2.6%e0
Comparator
initial valuese0

Verbatim

e0

“FYM application for three years significantly im- proved the initial values of soil organic carbon (14.3%), available N (10.7%), P (5.4%) and K (2.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of organic farming on yield, quality and soil-fertility status under basmati rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice equivalent system yield was 9.99 t/ha with inorganic fertilizer versus 8.88 t/ha with manure.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
inorganic fertilisere0
Outcome
rice-equivalent yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
9.99 t/hae0
Qualifier
8.88 t/hae0
Comparator
FYM applicatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Systemis pro- ductivity in terms of rice-equivalent yield was 9.99 t/ha with inorganic fertiliser and 8.88 t/ha with FYM application (30 t/ha in rice and 40 t/ha in wheat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of organic farming on yield, quality and soil-fertility status under basmati rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilization gave significantly higher net returns of Rs 74,170.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizatione0
Outcome
Net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs 74,170e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Net returns (Rs 74,170) and benefit : cost ratio (2.1) were significantly higher under inorganic fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of organic farming on yield, quality and soil-fertility status under basmati rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilization gave a significantly higher benefit to cost ratio of 2.1.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizatione0
Outcome
benefit : cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Net returns (Rs 74,170) and benefit : cost ratio (2.1) were significantly higher under inorganic fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of organic farming on yield, quality and soil-fertility status under basmati rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 110 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 110 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 71 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 232 positive, 56 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

279 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.