Paper · 2013 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Productivity, Nutrient Balance, Soil Quality, and Sustainability of Rice (Oryza sativaL.) under Organic and Conventional Production Systems

K. Surekha; Y. S. Satishkumar

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted for 5 years (2004–2005 to 2009–2010) covering 10 crop seasons [five wet (WS; Kharif) and five dry (DS; Rabi)] at the Directorate of Rice Research farm, Hyderabad, India, to compare the influence of organic and conventional farming systems on productivity of fine grain rice varieties, cumulative partial nutrient balance, and soil health/quality in terms of nutrient availability, physical and biological properties, and sustainability index. Two main plot treatments were with and without plant protection measures, and four subplot treatments were (1) control (CON), (2) inorganic fertilizers (CF), (3) organics (OF), and (4) inorganics + organics (integrated nutrient management, INM). During wet season, grain yields with CF and INM were near stable (5.0 to 5.5 t ha−1) and superior to organics by 15–20% during the first 2 years, which improved with OF (4.8 to 5.4 t ha−1) in the later years to comparable levels with CF and INM. However, during DS, CF and INM were superior to OF for 4 consecutive years and OF recorded yields on par with CF and INM in the fifth year. The partial nutrient balance over 10 crop seasons for N and P was positive and greater with OF and INM over CF and for K it was positive with OF alone and negative with CF and INM. There were increases in SOC and available N, P, and K by 50–58%, 3–10%, 10–30%, and 8–25% respectively, with OF, over CF at the end of 5 years. The sustainability index (SI) of the soil system was maximum with organics (1.63) and CF recorded 1.33, which was just above the minimum sustainability index of 1.30 after 5 years. Thus, organic farming needs more than 2 years to stabilize rice productivity and bring about perceptible improvement in soil quality and sustainability in irrigated rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wet seasons, CF grain yield was 15–20% above organics in the first two years.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativaL.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
CFe0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
15–20%e0
Qualifier
during the first 2 yearse0
Comparator
organicse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“grain yields with CF and INM were near stable (5.0 to 5.5 t ha−1) and superior to organics by 15–20% during the first 2 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wet seasons, INM grain yield was 15–20% above organics in the first two years.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativaL.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
INMe0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
15–20%e0
Comparator
organicse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“grain yields with CF and INM were near stable (5.0 to 5.5 t ha−1) and superior to organics by 15–20% during the first 2 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wet-season OF yields later improved to 4.8 to 5.4 t ha−1, comparable with CF and INM.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativaL.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
OFe0
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
improvede0
Value
4.8 to 5.4 t ha−1e0
Comparator
CF and INMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“improved with OF (4.8 to 5.4 t ha−1) in the later years to comparable levels with CF and INM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–966 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yields with CF and INM were near stable (5.0 to 5.5 t ha−1) and superior to organics by 15–20% during the first 2 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In dry seasons CF outyielded OF for four consecutive years, with parity in the fifth.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativaL.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
CFe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
for 4 consecutive yearse0
Comparator
OFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“during DS, CF and INM were superior to OF for 4 consecutive years and OF recorded yields on par with CF and INM in the fifth year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In dry seasons INM outyielded OF for four consecutive years, with parity in the fifth.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativaL.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
INMe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
OFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“during DS, CF and INM were superior to OF for 4 consecutive years and OF recorded yields on par with CF and INM in the fifth year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N and P partial nutrient balances were positive and greater with OF and INM than CF.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativaL.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
OF and INMe0
Outcome
partial nutrient balancee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
CFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“partial nutrient balance over 10 crop seasons for N and P was positive and greater with OF and INM over CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1218 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K partial nutrient balance was positive with OF but negative with CF and INM.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativaL.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
OFe0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
CF and INMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“for K it was positive with OF alone and negative with CF and INM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After five years OF raised soil organic carbon by 50–58% over CF.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativaL.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
OFe0
Outcome
SOCe0
Direction
increasese0
Value
50–58%e0
Comparator
CFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“increases in SOC and available N, P, and K by 50–58%, 3–10%, 10–30%, and 8–25% respectively, with OF, over CF at the end of 5 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After five years OF raised available N by 3–10% over CF.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativaL.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
OFe0
Outcome
available Ne0
Direction
increasese0
Value
3–10%e0
Comparator
CFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“increases in SOC and available N, P, and K by 50–58%, 3–10%, 10–30%, and 8–25% respectively, with OF, over CF at the end of 5 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After five years OF raised available P by 10–30% over CF.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativaL.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
OFe0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
increasese0
Value
10–30%e0
Comparator
CFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“increases in SOC and available N, P, and K by 50–58%, 3–10%, 10–30%, and 8–25% respectively, with OF, over CF at the end of 5 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After five years OF raised available K by 8–25% over CF.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativaL.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
OFe0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
increasese0
Value
8–25%e0
Comparator
CFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“increases in SOC and available N, P, and K by 50–58%, 3–10%, 10–30%, and 8–25% respectively, with OF, over CF at the end of 5 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil sustainability index was maximal under organics at 1.63, versus 1.33 under CF.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativaL.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
organicse0
Outcome
sustainability index (SI) of the soil systeme0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.63e0
Qualifier
1.33e0
Comparator
CFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“sustainability index (SI) of the soil system was maximum with organics (1.63) and CF recorded 1.33”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1535 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Organic farming needs more than two years to stabilize rice productivity and improve soil quality and sustainability.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativaL.)Oryza sativat0
Outcome
organic farming needs more than 2 yearse0
Qualifier
irrigated ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“organic farming needs more than 2 years to stabilize rice productivity and bring about perceptible improvement in soil quality and sustainability in irrigated rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1783 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.