Paper · 1995 · The Professional Animal Scientist

Forage Intake, Diet Quality, and Performance of Stocker Cattle Grazing Interseeded or Monocultured Rye and Bermudagrass

J.L. Moyer; K.P. Coffey; F.K. Brazle; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] is productive in summer but is dormant for much of the year. The grazing season for bermudagrass pastures can be lengthened by fall interseeding of rye (Secale cereale L.). In trial 1, performance of Stocker cattle (222 kg average BW) grazing monocultured rye (MR) followed by bermudagrass (MB) in separate pastures was compared with that of cattle grazing interseeded rye-bermudagrass pastures (IRB). Spring forage production and 1989 carrying capacity were greater (P<.01)from MR than from spring IRB but gain per animal and per hectare did not differ (P>.10)between systems. Summer bermudagrass gain and grazing days from the two systems varied by year. Overall gain per hectare of land grazed and animal grazing days per hectare were greater (P<.05) both years for the IRB system than for the combined use of MR and MB. Land Equivalent Ratio for overall gain from IRB was >2.0, indicating a greater efficiency for interseeding. In trial 2, ruminally fistulated heifers (395 kg average BW) were used to estimate forage intake and nutritional components from the two types of rye pastures. Dietary forage from MR was higher (P≤.01) in neutraldetergent fiber, ADF, and in vitro organic matter digestion (IVOMD, 48 h) and lower (P<.01)in acid-detergent lignin (ADL) and indigestible ADF (IADF) than forage from IRB. Crude protein and rates of IVOMD did not differ (P>.10) between MR and IRB dietary forage. Heifers grazing MR had higher (P<.01)OM intake, lower OM (P=.06) and IADF (P<.01) fill, and shorter (P<.05) rumen retention time than heifers grazing IRB. Growers may obtain greater animal production per hectare by interseeding winter cereals into bermudagrass than by monoculturing separate pastures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring forage production and 1989 carrying capacity were greater from monocultured rye than from spring interseeded rye-bermudagrass.

Taxon
Secale cerealeSecale cerealee0
Treatment
MRe1
Outcome
Spring forage production and 1989 carrying capacitye1
Direction
greatere1
Qualifier
P<.01e1
Comparator
spring IRBe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interseeding of rye (Secale cereale L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–214 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spring forage production and 1989 carrying capacity were greater (P<.01)from MR than from spring IRB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gain per animal and per hectare did not differ between monocultured rye followed by bermudagrass and interseeded rye-bermudagrass.

Taxon
Secale cerealeSecale cerealee0
Treatment
monocultured rye (MR) followed by bermudagrass (MB)e3
Outcome
gain per animal and per hectaree4
Direction
did not differe4
Qualifier
P>.10e4
Comparator
interseeded rye-bermudagrass pastures (IRB)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interseeding of rye (Secale cereale L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–214 · show in text ↑
e4

“gain per animal and per hectare did not differ (P>.10)between systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–619 · show in text ↑
e3

“grazing monocultured rye (MR) followed by bermudagrass (MB) in separate pastures was compared with that of cattle grazing interseeded rye-bermudagrass pastures (IRB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–443 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer bermudagrass gain and grazing days varied by year between the two systems.

Taxon
Cynodon dactylonCynodon dactylone2
Outcome
Summer bermudagrass gain and grazing dayse5
Qualifier
varied by yeare5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–41 · show in text ↑
e5

“Summer bermudagrass gain and grazing days from the two systems varied by year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall gain per hectare and animal grazing days per hectare were greater on interseeded rye-bermudagrass than on the combined monoculture use in both years.

Taxon
Secale cerealeSecale cerealee0
Treatment
IRB systeme6
Outcome
Overall gain per hectare of land grazed and animal grazing days per hectaree6
Direction
greatere6
Qualifier
both yearse6
Comparator
combined use of MR and MBe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interseeding of rye (Secale cereale L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–214 · show in text ↑
e6

“Overall gain per hectare of land grazed and animal grazing days per hectare were greater (P<.05) both years for the IRB system than for the combined use of MR and MB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–865 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Land Equivalent Ratio for overall gain from interseeding was above 2.0, indicating greater efficiency for interseeding.

Taxon
Secale cerealeSecale cerealee0
Outcome
Land Equivalent Ratio for overall gaine7
Value
>2.0e7
Qualifier
indicating a greater efficiency for interseedinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interseeding of rye (Secale cereale L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–214 · show in text ↑
e7

“Land Equivalent Ratio for overall gain from IRB was >2.0, indicating a greater efficiency for interseeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dietary forage from monocultured rye was higher in neutral detergent fiber, ADF and in vitro organic matter digestion than forage from interseeded pastures.

Taxon
Secale cerealeSecale cerealee0
Treatment
Dietary forage from MRe1
Outcome
neutraldetergent fiber, ADF, and in vitro organic matter digestione1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
forage from IRBe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interseeding of rye (Secale cereale L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–214 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dietary forage from MR was higher (P≤.01) in neutraldetergent fiber, ADF, and in vitro organic matter digestion (IVOMD, 48 h) and lower (P<.01)in acid-detergent lignin (ADL) and indigestible ADF (IADF) than forage from IRB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dietary forage from monocultured rye was lower in acid-detergent lignin and indigestible ADF than forage from interseeded pastures.

Taxon
Secale cerealeSecale cerealee0
Treatment
Dietary forage from MRe1
Outcome
acid-detergent lignin (ADL) and indigestible ADF (IADF)e1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
forage from IRBe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interseeding of rye (Secale cereale L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–214 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dietary forage from MR was higher (P≤.01) in neutraldetergent fiber, ADF, and in vitro organic matter digestion (IVOMD, 48 h) and lower (P<.01)in acid-detergent lignin (ADL) and indigestible ADF (IADF) than forage from IRB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein and in vitro organic matter digestion rates did not differ between monocultured rye and interseeded forage.

Taxon
Secale cerealeSecale cerealee0
Treatment
MRe1
Outcome
Crude protein and rates of IVOMDe1
Direction
did not differe1
Qualifier
P>.10e1
Comparator
IRBe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interseeding of rye (Secale cereale L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–214 · show in text ↑
e1

“Crude protein and rates of IVOMD did not differ (P>.10) between MR and IRB dietary forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heifers grazing monocultured rye had higher organic matter intake than heifers grazing interseeded pastures.

Taxon
Secale cerealeSecale cerealee0
Treatment
grazing MRe1
Outcome
OM intakee1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
P<.01e1
Comparator
grazing IRBe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interseeding of rye (Secale cereale L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–214 · show in text ↑
e1

“Heifers grazing MR had higher (P<.01)OM intake, lower OM (P=.06) and IADF (P<.01) fill, and shorter (P<.05) rumen retention time than heifers grazing IRB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heifers grazing monocultured rye had lower organic matter fill than heifers grazing interseeded pastures.

Taxon
Secale cerealeSecale cerealee0
Treatment
grazing MRe1
Outcome
OMe1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
P=.06e1
Comparator
grazing IRBe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interseeding of rye (Secale cereale L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–214 · show in text ↑
e1

“Heifers grazing MR had higher (P<.01)OM intake, lower OM (P=.06) and IADF (P<.01) fill, and shorter (P<.05) rumen retention time than heifers grazing IRB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heifers grazing monocultured rye had lower IADF fill than heifers grazing interseeded pastures.

Taxon
Secale cerealeSecale cerealee0
Treatment
grazing MRe1
Outcome
IADFe1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
P<.01e1
Comparator
grazing IRBe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interseeding of rye (Secale cereale L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–214 · show in text ↑
e1

“Heifers grazing MR had higher (P<.01)OM intake, lower OM (P=.06) and IADF (P<.01) fill, and shorter (P<.05) rumen retention time than heifers grazing IRB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heifers grazing monocultured rye had shorter rumen retention time than heifers grazing interseeded pastures.

Taxon
Secale cerealeSecale cerealee0
Treatment
grazing MRe1
Outcome
rumen retention timee1
Direction
shortere1
Qualifier
P<.05e1
Comparator
grazing IRBe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interseeding of rye (Secale cereale L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–214 · show in text ↑
e1

“Heifers grazing MR had higher (P<.01)OM intake, lower OM (P=.06) and IADF (P<.01) fill, and shorter (P<.05) rumen retention time than heifers grazing IRB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1603 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Growers may obtain greater animal production per hectare by interseeding winter cereals into bermudagrass than by monoculturing separate pastures.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylone0
Treatment
interseeding winter cereals into bermudagrasse0
Outcome
animal production per hectaree0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
monoculturing separate pasturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growers may obtain greater animal production per hectare by interseeding winter cereals into bermudagrass than by monoculturing separate pastures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1750 · show in text ↑

rotation · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

rotation · quality: protein · Secale cereale (rye)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.