Paper · 2003 · Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India)

Response of Banana to Drip Irrigation under Different Irrigation Designs

SK Pattanaik; NN Sahu; PC Pradhan; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was carried out on the lateritic sandy loam soil of Bhubaneswar, Orissa to evaluate the economic feasibility of drip irrigation with black LDPE (Low Density Polyethylene) mulch field of different levels of irrigation for Banana crop. Out of eight treatments, six treatments are of drip irrigation with three levels of irrigation (V, 0.8Y, 0.6V) and two treatments are of basin irrigation. The study indicated that better plant growth, early emergence of flower and enhancement in the yield under drip irrigation with plastic mulch. The highest yield (525.33 quintal) was recorded under drip irrigation (0.8 V) with mulch (T6) as compared to other treatments. An increase of 52% in banana yield and 54% in net seasonal income were recorded in case of 80% irrigation requirement of drip irrigation with mulch as compared to conventional ring basin irrigation. Benefit cost ratio was also found to be highest for the same treatment and at par with that of the conventional basin irrigation. Water use efficiency was found to be highest under drip irrigation (0.8V) with mulch (T6) followed by drip irrigation (0.6V) with mulch (T).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation with plastic mulch improved banana growth.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
drip irrigation with plastic mulche0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“better plant growth, early emergence of flower and enhancement in the yield under drip irrigation with plastic mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation with plastic mulch promoted early flower emergence in banana.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
drip irrigation with plastic mulche0
Outcome
emergence of flowere0
Direction
earlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“better plant growth, early emergence of flower and enhancement in the yield under drip irrigation with plastic mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation with plastic mulch enhanced banana yield.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
drip irrigation with plastic mulche0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“enhancement in the yield under drip irrigation with plastic mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 0.8 V with mulch had the highest yield, 525.33 quintal.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
drip irrigation (0.8 V) with mulch (T6)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
525.33 quintale0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield (525.33 quintal) was recorded under drip irrigation (0.8 V) with mulch (T6) as compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation with mulch at 80% irrigation requirement increased banana yield by 52% relative to ring basin irrigation.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
80% irrigation requirement of drip irrigation with mulche0
Outcome
banana yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
52%e0
Comparator
conventional ring basin irrigatione0

Verbatim

e0

“An increase of 52% in banana yield and 54% in net seasonal income were recorded in case of 80% irrigation requirement of drip irrigation with mulch as compared to conventional ring basin irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same irrigation treatment increased net seasonal income by 54%.

Treatment
80% irrigation requirement of drip irrigation with mulche0
Outcome
net seasonal incomee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
54%e0
Comparator
conventional ring basin irrigatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“An increase of 52% in banana yield and 54% in net seasonal income were recorded in case of 80% irrigation requirement of drip irrigation with mulch as compared to conventional ring basin irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–874 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit cost ratio was highest with this treatment and at par with conventional basin irrigation.

Outcome
Benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
at pare0
Comparator
conventional basin irrigatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Benefit cost ratio was also found to be highest for the same treatment and at par with that of the conventional basin irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1004 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency was highest under 0.8V drip irrigation with mulch, followed by 0.6V drip irrigation with mulch.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
drip irrigation (0.8V) with mulch (T6)e0
Outcome
Water use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
drip irrigation (0.6V) with mulch (T)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Water use efficiency was found to be highest under drip irrigation (0.8V) with mulch (T6) followed by drip irrigation (0.6V) with mulch (T).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · MusaResults differ

76 papers: 67 positive, 9 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

mulching · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

mulching · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · MusaPositive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

irrigation · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

29 papers: 24 positive, 5 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · MusaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.