Paper · 2018 · Engenharia Agrícola

GAS EXCHANGE IN ‘POME’ BANANA PLANTS GROWN UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION SYSTEMS

Alessandro de M. Arantes; Sérgio L. R. Donato; Dalmo L. de Siqueira; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate Pome type bananas grown under different irrigation systems. Seventy-two treatments were used in a factorial 3×2×12 scheme, where factors consisted of three irrigation systems (under-tree sprinkling, micro-sprinkling, and dripping), two cultivars (‘Prata-Anã‘ and ‘BRS Platina’), and twelve evaluation periods (months). The treatments were arranged in a completely randomized design with five repetitions. During the third production cycle, plant phytotechnical and physiological traits were evaluated in different months at five different times of the day. The results showed no significant interactions between cultivars and irrigation systems. All the assessed traits varied for each irrigation system, except for plant yield. The banana plants presented higher vigor and a larger number of hands when grown under conventional sprinkling and micro-aspersion systems, regardless of the cultivar. The cultivar ‘Prata-Anã‘ has larger leaf areas and number of hands, regardless of the irrigation system. Moreover, plants irrigated by dripping exhibited higher leaf temperatures, higher transpiration rates, and lower instant water-use efficiency. When irrigated by micro-sprinklers, the plants displayed greater water-use efficiency. As leaf temperature rose, perspiration increased linearly, while the instant water-use efficiency decreased linearly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and irrigation system had no significant interaction.

Taxon
banana plantst0
Outcome
interactions between cultivars and irrigation systemse0
Direction
no significante0

Verbatim

e0

“no significant interactions between cultivars and irrigation systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Traits varied among irrigation systems except yield.

Taxon
banana plantst0
Treatment
irrigation systeme0
Outcome
assessed traitse0
Direction
variede0
Qualifier
except for plant yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“All the assessed traits varied for each irrigation system, except for plant yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant yield did not vary among irrigation systems.

Taxon
banana plantst0
Treatment
irrigation systeme0
Outcome
plant yielde0
Direction
excepte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All the assessed traits varied for each irrigation system, except for plant yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional sprinkling and micro-aspersion produced higher banana vigor and hand number.

Taxon
banana plantse0
Treatment
conventional sprinkling and micro-aspersion systemse0
Outcome
vigor and a larger number of handse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
regardless of the cultivare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The banana plants presented higher vigor and a larger number of hands when grown under conventional sprinkling and micro-aspersion systems, regardless of the cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–925 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prata-Anã had larger leaf area and more hands across irrigation systems.

Taxon
banana plantst0
Material
‘Prata-Anã‘e0
Outcome
leaf areas and number of handse0
Direction
largere0
Qualifier
regardless of the irrigation systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar ‘Prata-Anã‘ has larger leaf areas and number of hands, regardless of the irrigation system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dripping raised leaf temperature.

Taxon
banana plantst0
Treatment
drippinge0
Outcome
leaf temperaturese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“plants irrigated by dripping exhibited higher leaf temperatures, higher transpiration rates, and lower instant water-use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dripping raised transpiration rate.

Taxon
banana plantst0
Treatment
drippinge0
Outcome
transpiration ratese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“plants irrigated by dripping exhibited higher leaf temperatures, higher transpiration rates, and lower instant water-use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dripping reduced instantaneous water-use efficiency.

Taxon
banana plantst0
Treatment
drippinge0
Outcome
instant water-use efficiencye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“plants irrigated by dripping exhibited higher leaf temperatures, higher transpiration rates, and lower instant water-use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micro-sprinklers increased water-use efficiency.

Taxon
banana plantst0
Treatment
micro-sprinklerse0
Outcome
water-use efficiencye0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“When irrigated by micro-sprinklers, the plants displayed greater water-use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perspiration increased linearly as leaf temperature rose.

Taxon
banana plantst0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
perspiratione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
linearlye0

Verbatim

e0

“As leaf temperature rose, perspiration increased linearly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Instant water-use efficiency decreased linearly as leaf temperature rose.

Taxon
banana plantst0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
instant water-use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“As leaf temperature rose, perspiration increased linearly, while the instant water-use efficiency decreased linearly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“BANANA PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · MusaResults differ

76 papers: 67 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.