Paper · 2005 · Fruits

Evaluation of the banana cultivars Zelig, Grande Naine and Gruesa under different environmental conditions in the Canary Islands

Juan Cabrera Cabrera; Victor Galán Saúco

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Introduction. A study was done to compare Gruesa, a local dwarf Cavendish selection, with two other cultivars of the Cavendish subgroup in the open air or under greenhouse conditions in two localities of the Canary Islands. Materials and methods. The trials were set up with the cultivars Zelig, Grande Naine and Gruesa in four plots on the northern slope: one outdoors and three under three different greenhouse covers (one with polyethylene lamina and the other two with different types of mesh), and in one outdoor plot on the southern slope of the island of Tenerife. Morphological, phenological and production characteristics were studied over three productive cycles. Results. Significant differences were found in both plant height (Grande Naine > Zelig > Gruesa) and pseudostem thickness (Gruesa > Grande Naine = Zelig). Each cultivar showed a stable [height:thickness] ratio, remaining the same in all trial conditions. Gruesa cycle length was longer than those of the other two cultivars, emitting more leaves until bunch emergency. Gruesa produced the most hands per bunch and the most fingers per hand. In all cultivars, finger length was directly related to pseudostem height. All three cultivars produced well, with fruits very similar in organoleptic traits. A reduction in cycle length and a slight increase in productivity were observed in the northern plot under the polyethylene cover compared with the plots under other covers and outdoors. Conclusion. Gruesa appears more recommendable than Zelig and Grande Naine for open-air plantations in windy localities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height differed significantly among banana cultivars, with Grande Naine tallest and Gruesa shortest.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
plant heighte1
Qualifier
Grande Naine > Zelig > Gruesae1

Verbatim

t0

“banana cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant differences were found in both plant height (Grande Naine > Zelig > Gruesa) and pseudostem thickness (Gruesa > Grande Naine = Zelig)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–827 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudostem thickness differed significantly among banana cultivars, with Gruesa thickest.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
pseudostem thicknesse1
Qualifier
Gruesa > Grande Naine = Zelige1

Verbatim

t0

“banana cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant differences were found in both plant height (Grande Naine > Zelig > Gruesa) and pseudostem thickness (Gruesa > Grande Naine = Zelig)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–827 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each banana cultivar kept a stable height to thickness ratio across all trial conditions.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
[height:thickness] ratioe1
Qualifier
remaining the same in all trial conditionse1

Verbatim

t0

“banana cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“Each cultivar showed a stable [height:thickness] ratio, remaining the same in all trial conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–927 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gruesa had a longer cycle length than the other two banana cultivars.

Taxon
bananat0
Material
Gruesae1
Outcome
cycle lengthe1
Direction
longere1
Comparator
other two cultivarse1

Verbatim

t0

“banana cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gruesa cycle length was longer than those of the other two cultivars, emitting more leaves until bunch emergency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1041 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gruesa emitted more leaves until bunch emergence than the other cultivars.

Taxon
bananat0
Material
Gruesae1
Outcome
leaves until bunch emergencye1
Direction
moree1

Verbatim

t0

“banana cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gruesa cycle length was longer than those of the other two cultivars, emitting more leaves until bunch emergency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1041 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gruesa produced the most hands per bunch.

Taxon
bananat0
Material
Gruesae1
Outcome
hands per bunche1
Direction
moste1

Verbatim

t0

“banana cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gruesa produced the most hands per bunch and the most fingers per hand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gruesa produced the most fingers per hand.

Taxon
bananat0
Material
Gruesae1
Outcome
fingers per hande1
Direction
moste1

Verbatim

t0

“banana cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gruesa produced the most hands per bunch and the most fingers per hand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1113 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Finger length was directly related to pseudostem height across all banana cultivars.

Taxon
bananat0
Organ / stage
pseudosteme1
Outcome
finger lengthe1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“banana cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“In all cultivars, finger length was directly related to pseudostem height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1188 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three banana cultivars produced well.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
produced welle1

Verbatim

t0

“banana cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“All three cultivars produced well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1223 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruits of the three banana cultivars were very similar in organoleptic traits.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
organoleptic traitse2
Qualifier
very similare2

Verbatim

t0

“banana cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–34 · show in text ↑
e2

“fruits very similar in organoleptic traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyethylene cover reduced banana cycle length in the northern plot compared with other covers and outdoors.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
polyethylene covere1
Outcome
cycle lengthe1
Direction
reductione1
Comparator
other covers and outdoorse1
Setting
northern plote1

Verbatim

t0

“banana cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“A reduction in cycle length and a slight increase in productivity were observed in the northern plot under the polyethylene cover compared with the plots under other covers and outdoors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyethylene cover slightly increased banana productivity in the northern plot compared with other covers and outdoors.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
polyethylene covere1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
slighte1
Comparator
other covers and outdoorse1

Verbatim

t0

“banana cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“A reduction in cycle length and a slight increase in productivity were observed in the northern plot under the polyethylene cover compared with the plots under other covers and outdoors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1459 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Gruesa is more recommendable than Zelig and Grande Naine for open-air banana plantations in windy localities.

Taxon
bananat0
Material
Gruesae1
Outcome
open-air plantations in windy localitiese1
Comparator
Zelig and Grande Nainee1

Verbatim

t0

“banana cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gruesa appears more recommendable than Zelig and Grande Naine for open-air plantations in windy localities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1579 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.