Abstract
Field experiment was conducted to study the effect of integrated management of fertilizer N, vermicompost and Azolla on grain yield, nutrient uptake and soil fertility in a clayey soil for three years (1999–2001). The highest grain and straw yields were recorded with the application of 60 kg N ha−1 plus Azolla. The combined application of fertilizer N, vermicompost and Azolla sustained the productivity even at lower rate of fertilizer N application. The highest N, P and K uptake was also recorded with the application of 60 kg N ha−1 plus Azolla treatment. Moreover, the soil organic carbon, available N, P and K content increased with the application of fertilizer N alone and in conjunction with vermicompost or Azolla compared with control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
In rice, the highest grain and straw yields were recorded with 60 kg N ha-1 plus Azolla.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- 60 kg N ha−1 plus Azollae1
- Outcome
- grain and straw yieldse1
- Direction
- higheste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“nutrient uptake by rice”
e1“The highest grain and straw yields were recorded with the application of 60 kg N ha−1 plus Azolla”
Claim · model-written summary
In rice, combined application of fertilizer N, vermicompost and Azolla sustained productivity even at a lower rate of fertilizer N.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- combined application of fertilizer N, vermicompost and Azollae1
- Outcome
- productivitye1
- Direction
- sustainede1
- Qualifier
- even at lower rate of fertilizer N applicatione1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“nutrient uptake by rice”
e1“The combined application of fertilizer N, vermicompost and Azolla sustained the productivity even at lower rate of fertilizer N application”
Claim · model-written summary
In rice, the highest N, P and K uptake was recorded with 60 kg N ha-1 plus Azolla.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- 60 kg N ha−1 plus Azollae1
- Outcome
- N, P and K uptakee1
- Direction
- higheste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“nutrient uptake by rice”
e1“The highest N, P and K uptake was also recorded with the application of 60 kg N ha−1 plus Azolla treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil organic carbon increased with fertilizer N alone and together with vermicompost or Azolla compared with control in the rice experiment.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- fertilizer N alone and in conjunction with vermicompost or Azollae1
- Outcome
- soil organic carbone1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“nutrient uptake by rice”
e1“the soil organic carbon, available N, P and K content increased with the application of fertilizer N alone and in conjunction with vermicompost or Azolla compared with control”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil available N, P and K content increased with fertilizer N alone and together with vermicompost or Azolla compared with control in the rice experiment.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- fertilizer N alone and in conjunction with vermicompost or Azollae1
- Outcome
- available N, P and K contente1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“nutrient uptake by rice”
e1“the soil organic carbon, available N, P and K content increased with the application of fertilizer N alone and in conjunction with vermicompost or Azolla compared with control”
The same questions in other papers
Azolla · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →Azolla · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Azolla · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
279 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
301 papers more in this group
See all 305 papers →nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
460 papers more in this group
See all 464 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
989 papers more in this group
See all 993 papers →nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
2,041 papers more in this group
See all 2,045 papers →fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
3,451 papers more in this group
See all 3,455 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.