Paper · 2014

Efficiency of Glomus fasciculatum and Trichoderma viride in bio-control of soil-borne pathogen (Macrophomina phaseolina) on different groundnut cultivars.

Khirood Doley; Mahesh Borde; M. Dudhane; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present work was carried out on Groundnut for evaluating arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi along with Trichoderma as biological control agent against soil-borne pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina. In pot culture experiment groundnut seeds were inoculated with mycorrhizal inoculum and pre-treated with talc based Trichoderma viride singly or in combination before inoculation of pathogen M. phaseolina. After particular periods the emergence of disease incidence and severity were found to be lower in diseased groundnut plant where both antagonists were inoculated when compared with single inoculation of either antagonist or nonmycorrhizal control ones. The biochemical and antioxidant activities were observed to be increased due to inoculation of mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma. Thus, espousal of integrated management by AM fungi along with Trichoderma species seems to be economic and promiscuous way to improve to control M. phaseolina in low-input agricultural practice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined antagonist inoculation lowered disease incidence relative to single inoculation or nonmycorrhizal controls.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
both antagonists were inoculatede0
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae2pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
single inoculation of either antagonist or nonmycorrhizal control onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“groundnut seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–235 · show in text ↑
e0

“disease incidence and severity were found to be lower in diseased groundnut plant where both antagonists were inoculated when compared with single inoculation of either antagonist or nonmycorrhizal control ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–653 · show in text ↑
e2

“soil-borne pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined antagonist inoculation lowered disease severity relative to single inoculation or nonmycorrhizal controls.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
both antagonists were inoculatede0
Outcome
severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
single inoculation of either antagonist or nonmycorrhizal control onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“groundnut seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–235 · show in text ↑
e0

“disease incidence and severity were found to be lower in diseased groundnut plant where both antagonists were inoculated when compared with single inoculation of either antagonist or nonmycorrhizal control ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma inoculation increased biochemical and antioxidant activities.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
inoculation of mycorrhizal fungi and Trichodermae0
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Second interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
biochemical and antioxidant activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“groundnut seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–235 · show in text ↑
e0

“The biochemical and antioxidant activities were observed to be increased due to inoculation of mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–783 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated management with AM fungi and Trichoderma is proposed for Macrophomina control in low-input agriculture.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma speciesTrichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
integrated management by AM fungi along with Trichoderma speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“groundnut seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–235 · show in text ↑
e0

“espousal of integrated management by AM fungi along with Trichoderma species seems to be economic and promiscuous way to improve to control M. phaseolina in low-input agricultural practice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–979 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Macrophomina phaseolina · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 25 positive, 24 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

biocontrol · Macrophomina phaseolina · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.