Paper · 2004 · Peanut Science

Combined Effects of Biological Control Formulations, Cultivars, and Fungicides on Preharvest Colonization and Aflatoxin Contamination of Peanuts by Aspergillus Species

J. W. Dorner

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A 3-yr field study was conducted to determine the effect of biological control formulations of nontoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus, peanut cultivars, and fungicides on preharvest aflatoxin contamination of peanuts. Formulation treatments consisted of (a) no biocontrol treatment, (b) the fungi cultured on rice via solid-state fermentation, (c) conidia of the fungi coated onto the surface of rice, and (d) conidia coated onto the surface of wheat (year one) or hulled barley (years two and three). Experiments consisted of factorial combinations of the four formulation treatments, two peanut cultivars (Florunner or Georgia Green), and two fungicide treatments (chlorothalonil or combinations of chlorothalonil and tebuconazole). Florunner and Georgia Green peanuts were each planted in 32 individual plots consisting of six rows 15.2 m in length. Biological control formulations, consisting of a mixture of nontoxigenic strains of A. flavus (NRRL 21882) and A. parasiticus (NRRL 21369), were applied to the same plots in each of the 3 yr at a rate of 56 kg/ha. Foliar applications of fungicides were made as recommended for control of leaf spot, with one treatment being full-season applications of chlorothalonil, and the other being two applications of chlorothalonil followed by four applications of tebuconazole and remaining applications of chlorothalonil. Only in year two of the study was late-season drought sufficient to produce preharvest aflatoxin contamination. All biocontrol formulation treatments produced significant reductions in aflatoxin compared with untreated controls, averaging 81%. There was also a significant cultivar effect on aflatoxin with Georgia Green averaging 119 μg/kg compared with 402 μg/kg for Florunner. No differences were observed between the two fungicide treatments, and there was no interaction among the three factors. Analysis of soil for populations of A. flavus and A. parasiticus throughout the study showed that all formulations, except the conidia-coated wheat in the first year, were effective in delivering competitive levels of the nontoxigenic strains. In the third year, which did not result in significant aflatoxin contamination, analysis of peanuts for fungal colonization showed no significant differences among biocontrol treatments (including control) for total amounts of A. flavus and A. parasiticus in peanuts. However, the incidence of toxigenic isolates in peanuts was significantly reduced by all three biocontrol formulations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-season drought sufficient to produce preharvest aflatoxin contamination occurred only in year two of the study.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
late-season droughte0
Outcome
preharvest aflatoxin contaminatione0
Qualifier
Only in year twoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“Only in year two of the study was late-season drought sufficient to produce preharvest aflatoxin contamination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All biocontrol formulation treatments with nontoxigenic Aspergillus strains significantly reduced aflatoxin compared with untreated controls, by 81% on average.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
biocontrol formulation treatmentse0
Interactor
AspergillusAspergillust1pathogen
Outcome
aflatoxine0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
81%e0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Aspergillus
Aspergillus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–144 · show in text ↑
t1

“Aspergillus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–159 · show in text ↑
e0

“All biocontrol formulation treatments produced significant reductions in aflatoxin compared with untreated controls, averaging 81%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1642 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar had a significant effect on aflatoxin: Georgia Green averaged 119 ug/kg versus 402 ug/kg for Florunner.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Material
Georgia Greene0
Outcome
aflatoxine0
Value
119 μg/kge0
Qualifier
402 μg/kg for Florunnere0
Comparator
Florunnere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was also a significant cultivar effect on aflatoxin with Georgia Green averaging 119 μg/kg compared with 402 μg/kg for Florunner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No differences were observed between the two fungicide treatments.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
two fungicide treatmentse0
Direction
No differencese0

Not reportedComparatorOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“No differences were observed between the two fungicide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1780–1845 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no interaction among the three factors (biocontrol formulation, cultivar and fungicide).

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
no interaction among the three factorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was no interaction among the three factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1851–1899 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil analysis showed that all formulations except conidia-coated wheat in the first year delivered competitive levels of the nontoxigenic strains.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
delivering competitive levels of the nontoxigenic strainse0
Qualifier
except the conidia-coated wheat in the first yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“all formulations, except the conidia-coated wheat in the first year, were effective in delivering competitive levels of the nontoxigenic strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1999–2143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the third year, peanut fungal colonization showed no significant differences among biocontrol treatments, including the control, in total A. flavus and A. parasiticus.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
biocontrol treatmentse0
Interactor
A. flavus and A. parasiticusAspergillus flavusAspergillus parasiticuse0pathogen
Outcome
total amounts of A. flavus and A. parasiticus in peanutse0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus parasiticus
Aspergillus parasiticus · InteractorMedmyco · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“analysis of peanuts for fungal colonization showed no significant differences among biocontrol treatments (including control) for total amounts of A. flavus and A. parasiticus in peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2225–2411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The incidence of toxigenic isolates in peanuts was significantly reduced by all three biocontrol formulations.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
all three biocontrol formulationse0
Outcome
incidence of toxigenic isolates in peanutse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“the incidence of toxigenic isolates in peanuts was significantly reduced by all three biocontrol formulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2422–2531 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · Aspergillus flavus · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.