Paper · 2010

The Effects of the Elevated CO 2 Concentration and Increased Temperature on Growth, Yield and Physiological Responses of Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam).

Hae-Ran Kim; Young-Han You

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A global warming may have significant effect on physiology, development, growth and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam) due to increase in CO2 concentration and temperature. This study was conducted to determine the effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on the eco-physiological responses of rice. Rice plants were grown under AC-AT (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature), AC-ET (ambient CO2 + elevated temperature) and EC-ET (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) from May to October in 2009. Shoot length was high at AC-ET and root length was the highest at AC-AT and the lowest at EC-ET. Aboveground, and total biomass were the highest at AC-AT and the lowest at EC-ET. Belowground biomass and root:shoot ratio were higher at AC-AT than at AC-ET. Panicle length was decreased by elevated CO2 and temperature. Panicle weight and no. of grains per panicle were higher at AC-AT and AC-ET than at ECET. Grain ripened ratio and weight of grain were not significantly affected by elevated CO2 and temperature. Chlorophyll and nitrogen content were higher at AC-AT than at AC-ET and EC-ET. Nitrogen content was higher at AC-AT and AC-ET than at EC-ET and carbon content was not significantly affected by elevated CO2 and temperature. C:N ratio was higher at EC-ET than at AC-AT and AC-ET. From the result, it can be concluded that growth and yield of rice had negative response to global warming situation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot length of rice was high under AC-ET.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
Junamt0
Treatment
AC-ETe2
Outcome
Shoot lengthe2
Direction
highe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–153 · show in text ↑
e2

“Shoot length was high at AC-ET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length of rice was highest under AC-AT.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
Junamt0
Treatment
AC-ATe3
Outcome
root lengthe3
Direction
the higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–153 · show in text ↑
e3

“root length was the highest at AC-AT and the lowest at EC-ET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length of rice was lowest under EC-ET.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
Junamt0
Treatment
EC-ETe3
Outcome
root lengthe3
Direction
the loweste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–153 · show in text ↑
e3

“root length was the highest at AC-AT and the lowest at EC-ET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground and total biomass of rice were highest under AC-AT.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
Junamt0
Treatment
AC-ATe4
Outcome
Aboveground, and total biomasse4
Direction
the higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–153 · show in text ↑
e4

“Aboveground, and total biomass were the highest at AC-AT and the lowest at EC-ET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground and total biomass of rice were lowest under EC-ET.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
Junamt0
Treatment
EC-ETe4
Outcome
Aboveground, and total biomasse4
Direction
the loweste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–153 · show in text ↑
e4

“Aboveground, and total biomass were the highest at AC-AT and the lowest at EC-ET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Belowground biomass and root:shoot ratio of rice were higher under AC-AT than under AC-ET.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
Junamt0
Treatment
AC-ATe5
Outcome
Belowground biomass and root:shoot ratioe5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
AC-ETe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice plants were grown under AC-AT (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature), AC-ET (ambient CO2 + elevated temperature) and EC-ET (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–475 · show in text ↑
e5

“Belowground biomass and root:shoot ratio were higher at AC-AT than at AC-ET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panicle length of rice was decreased by elevated CO2 and temperature.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
Junamt0
Treatment
elevated CO2 and temperaturee6
Outcome
Panicle lengthe6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–153 · show in text ↑
e6

“Panicle length was decreased by elevated CO2 and temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panicle weight and grains per panicle of rice were higher under AC-AT and AC-ET than under ECET.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
Junamt0
Treatment
AC-AT and AC-ETe7
Outcome
Panicle weight and no. of grains per paniclee7
Direction
highere7
Comparator
ECETe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–153 · show in text ↑
e7

“Panicle weight and no. of grains per panicle were higher at AC-AT and AC-ET than at ECET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain ripened ratio and grain weight of rice were not significantly affected by elevated CO2 and temperature.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
Junamt0
Treatment
elevated CO2 and temperaturee1
Outcome
Grain ripened ratio and weight of graine1
Direction
not significantly affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain ripened ratio and weight of grain were not significantly affected by elevated CO2 and temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll and nitrogen content of rice were higher under AC-AT than under AC-ET and EC-ET.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
Junamt0
Treatment
AC-ATe2
Outcome
Chlorophyll and nitrogen contente2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
AC-ET and EC-ETe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–153 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chlorophyll and nitrogen content were higher at AC-AT than at AC-ET and EC-ET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen content of rice was higher under AC-AT and AC-ET than under EC-ET.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
Junamt0
Treatment
AC-AT and AC-ETe3
Outcome
Nitrogen contente3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
EC-ETe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–153 · show in text ↑
e3

“Nitrogen content was higher at AC-AT and AC-ET than at EC-ET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon content of rice was not significantly affected by elevated CO2 and temperature.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
Junamt0
Treatment
elevated CO2 and temperaturee4
Outcome
carbon contente4
Direction
not significantly affectede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–153 · show in text ↑
e4

“carbon content was not significantly affected by elevated CO2 and temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C:N ratio of rice was higher under EC-ET than under AC-AT and AC-ET.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
Junamt0
Treatment
EC-ETe5
Outcome
C:N ratioe5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
AC-AT and AC-ETe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–153 · show in text ↑
e5

“C:N ratio was higher at EC-ET than at AC-AT and AC-ET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield of rice responded negatively to the global warming situation.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
Junamt0
Treatment
global warming situatione6
Outcome
growth and yielde6
Direction
negative responsee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–153 · show in text ↑
e6

“growth and yield of rice had negative response to global warming situation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1412 · show in text ↑

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

43 papers: 23 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

co2 · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

159 papers: 131 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

155 papers more in this group

See all 159 papers →

heat · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 36 positive, 159 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.