Abstract
In order to evaluate the effects of foliar application of nitrogen and zinc on fruit set percent and quality of apple c.v ‘Golab Kohanz’ was conducted an experiment as factorial arrangement in randomized complete block design with three replications and one tree in each plot in one of the apple gardens placed in Kamfirouz region, Fars province, Iran, in autumn season. The first factor was foliar application of zinc (0, 3 and 6 gL -1 ) and the second factor was foliar application of urea (0, 3 and 5 gL -1 ). Based on the obtained results, the highest fruit set percent, fruit length, fruit diameter, Zn amount in shoot and root and chlorophyll index significantly (p<0.05) was observed in foliar application of 6 gL -1 Zn. Also the greatest fruit set percent, fruit length, fruit diameter, N amount in the root and leaf area was relative to foliar application of 5 gL -1 urea. Regards to the interaction between N and Zn, the highest fruit set percent, fruit length, fruit diameter, N amount in the root, leaf area and chlorophyll index significantly (p<0.05) was observed in treatment of 5 gL -1 urea and 6 gL -1 zinc.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
6 gL -1 Zn gave the highest fruit set percent, fruit length, and fruit diameter.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- foliar application of 6 gL -1 Zne0
- Outcome
- fruit set percent, fruit length, fruit diametere0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the highest fruit set percent, fruit length, fruit diameter, Zn amount in shoot and root and chlorophyll index significantly (p<0.05) was observed in foliar application of 6 gL -1 Zn”
t0“APPLE”
Claim · model-written summary
6 gL -1 Zn gave the highest shoot and root Zn amount.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- foliar application of 6 gL -1 Zne0
- Outcome
- Zn amount in shoot and roote0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the highest fruit set percent, fruit length, fruit diameter, Zn amount in shoot and root and chlorophyll index significantly (p<0.05) was observed in foliar application of 6 gL -1 Zn”
t0“APPLE”
Claim · model-written summary
6 gL -1 Zn gave the highest chlorophyll index.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- foliar application of 6 gL -1 Zne0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll indexe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the highest fruit set percent, fruit length, fruit diameter, Zn amount in shoot and root and chlorophyll index significantly (p<0.05) was observed in foliar application of 6 gL -1 Zn”
t0“APPLE”
Claim · model-written summary
5 gL -1 urea gave the greatest fruit set percent, fruit length, and fruit diameter.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- foliar application of 5 gL -1 ureae0
- Outcome
- fruit set percent, fruit length, fruit diametere0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the greatest fruit set percent, fruit length, fruit diameter, N amount in the root and leaf area was relative to foliar application of 5 gL -1 urea”
t0“APPLE”
Claim · model-written summary
5 gL -1 urea gave the greatest root N amount.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- foliar application of 5 gL -1 ureae0
- Outcome
- N amount in the roote0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the greatest fruit set percent, fruit length, fruit diameter, N amount in the root and leaf area was relative to foliar application of 5 gL -1 urea”
t0“APPLE”
Claim · model-written summary
5 gL -1 urea gave the greatest leaf area.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- foliar application of 5 gL -1 ureae0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the greatest fruit set percent, fruit length, fruit diameter, N amount in the root and leaf area was relative to foliar application of 5 gL -1 urea”
t0“APPLE”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined 5 gL -1 urea and 6 gL -1 zinc gave the highest fruit set percent, fruit length, and fruit diameter.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- 5 gL -1 urea and 6 gL -1 zince0
- Outcome
- fruit set percent, fruit length, fruit diametere0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the highest fruit set percent, fruit length, fruit diameter, N amount in the root, leaf area and chlorophyll index significantly (p<0.05) was observed in treatment of 5 gL -1 urea and 6 gL -1 zinc”
t0“APPLE”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined 5 gL -1 urea and 6 gL -1 zinc gave the highest root N amount and chlorophyll index.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- 5 gL -1 urea and 6 gL -1 zince0
- Outcome
- N amount in the root, leaf area and chlorophyll indexe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the highest fruit set percent, fruit length, fruit diameter, N amount in the root, leaf area and chlorophyll index significantly (p<0.05) was observed in treatment of 5 gL -1 urea and 6 gL -1 zinc”
t0“APPLE”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →zinc atom · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →zinc atom · physiology: pigments · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
nitrogen · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ
51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
63 papers more in this group
See all 67 papers →nitrogen · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ
51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →application · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
103 papers more in this group
See all 107 papers →application · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
112 papers more in this group
See all 116 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.