Paper · 2011

WEED SCIENCE Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control

Jared R. Whitaker; Alan C. York; David L. Jordan; et al.

18
claims
52
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) is a major problem in the southeastern U.S. Cooperative Extension personnel are actively promoting resistance management strategies, including integration of herbicides with other modes of action into glyphosate-based programs, to reduce selection pressure. This field experiment, conducted in five environments in North Carolina and Georgia during 2006 and 2007, evaluated residual control of Palmer amaranth by herbicides registered for use in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Treatments consisted of a factorial arrangement of 13 residual herbicides at 1X rates (manufacturer’s suggested use rates) and 1.5X rates. All herbicides were applied preemergence (PRE) to the weeds to evaluate residual effectiveness. Results varied by environment, depending primarily upon time and amount of rainfall. Herbicides at 1.5X rates were an average of 9% more effective 20 d after application compared with 1X rates. Of the herbicides typically applied PRE or preplant, fomesafen, flumioxazin, and pyrithiobac were the most effective. These herbicides controlled Palmer amaranth 74 to 100%, depending upon environment, at 20 d. Fluometuron and diuron were intermediately effective, controlling Palmer amaranth 41 to 91%, and pendimethalin and prometryn were least effective (30 to 82%). Pyrithiobac and S-metolachlor were the most effective of herbicides that could be applied postemergence (POST) to cotton. Pyrithiobac (75 to 97% at 20 d) was more effective than trifloxysulfuron (34 to 88%), and S-metolachlor (57 to 96%) was more effective than metolachlor (32 to 86%). Flumioxazin (82 to 100% at 20 d) was the most effective option for postemergence-directed (POST-DIR) application. Diuron, linuron, linuron plus diuron, and prometryn plus trifloxysulfuron were inter mediately effective (48 to 97%), and prometryn was least effective (30 to 79%). Integration of effective residual herbicides into glyphosate-based management systems will help sustain cotton production in areas infested with Palmer amaranth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control varied by environment, mainly with rainfall timing and amount.

Outcome
Results varied by environmente0
Setting
environmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results varied by environment, depending primarily upon time and amount of rainfall.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rates of 1.5X were 9% more effective than 1X rates after 20 days.

Treatment
Herbicides at 1.5X ratese0
Outcome
effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Value
9%e0
Qualifier
20 d after applicatione0
Comparator
1X ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicides at 1.5X rates were an average of 9% more effective 20 d after application compared with 1X rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fomesafen was among the most effective PRE or preplant herbicides, controlling Palmer amaranth 74 to 100% at 20 days.

Treatment
fomesafene0
Outcome
controlled Palmer amaranthe0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
74 to 100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the herbicides typically applied PRE or preplant, fomesafen, flumioxazin, and pyrithiobac were the most effective. These herbicides controlled Palmer amaranth 74 to 100%, depending upon environment, at 20 d.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flumioxazin was among the most effective PRE or preplant herbicides.

Treatment
flumioxazine0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the herbicides typically applied PRE or preplant, fomesafen, flumioxazin, and pyrithiobac were the most effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrithiobac was among the most effective PRE or preplant herbicides.

Treatment
pyrithiobace0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the herbicides typically applied PRE or preplant, fomesafen, flumioxazin, and pyrithiobac were the most effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluometuron had intermediate control of Palmer amaranth at 41 to 91%.

Treatment
Fluometurone0
Outcome
controlling Palmer amaranthe0
Direction
intermediately effectivee0
Value
41 to 91%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fluometuron and diuron were intermediately effective, controlling Palmer amaranth 41 to 91%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diuron had intermediate control of Palmer amaranth at 41 to 91%.

Treatment
diurone0
Outcome
controlling Palmer amaranthe0
Direction
intermediately effectivee0
Value
41 to 91%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fluometuron and diuron were intermediately effective, controlling Palmer amaranth 41 to 91%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin was among the least effective, with 30 to 82% control.

Treatment
pendimethaline0
Outcome
least effectivee0
Direction
least effectivee0
Value
30 to 82%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pendimethalin and prometryn were least effective (30 to 82%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prometryn was among the least effective, with 30 to 82% control.

Treatment
prometryne0
Outcome
least effectivee0
Direction
least effectivee0
Value
30 to 82%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pendimethalin and prometryn were least effective (30 to 82%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrithiobac controlled Palmer amaranth better than trifloxysulfuron, at 75 to 97% at 20 days.

Treatment
Pyrithiobace0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Value
75 to 97%e0
Qualifier
34 to 88%e0
Comparator
trifloxysulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyrithiobac (75 to 97% at 20 d) was more effective than trifloxysulfuron (34 to 88%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-metolachlor was more effective than metolachlor, at 57 to 96%.

Treatment
S-metolachlore0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Value
57 to 96%e0
Qualifier
32 to 86%e0
Comparator
metolachlore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S-metolachlor (57 to 96%) was more effective than metolachlor (32 to 86%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flumioxazin was the most effective POST-DIR option, at 82 to 100% control.

Treatment
Flumioxazine0
Outcome
most effective optione0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
82 to 100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flumioxazin (82 to 100% at 20 d) was the most effective option for postemergence-directed (POST-DIR) application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1744 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diuron had intermediate POST-DIR effectiveness.

Treatment
Diurone0
Outcome
inter mediately effectivee0
Direction
inter mediately effectivee0
Value
48 to 97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diuron, linuron, linuron plus diuron, and prometryn plus trifloxysulfuron were inter mediately effective (48 to 97%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1861 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linuron had intermediate POST-DIR effectiveness.

Treatment
linurone0
Outcome
inter mediately effectivee0
Direction
inter mediately effectivee0
Value
48 to 97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diuron, linuron, linuron plus diuron, and prometryn plus trifloxysulfuron were inter mediately effective (48 to 97%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1861 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linuron plus diuron had intermediate POST-DIR effectiveness.

Treatment
linuron plus diurone0
Outcome
inter mediately effectivee0
Direction
inter mediately effectivee0
Value
48 to 97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diuron, linuron, linuron plus diuron, and prometryn plus trifloxysulfuron were inter mediately effective (48 to 97%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1861 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prometryn plus trifloxysulfuron had intermediate POST-DIR effectiveness.

Treatment
prometryn plus trifloxysulfurone0
Outcome
inter mediately effectivee0
Direction
inter mediately effectivee0
Value
48 to 97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diuron, linuron, linuron plus diuron, and prometryn plus trifloxysulfuron were inter mediately effective (48 to 97%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1861 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prometryn was least effective for POST-DIR application, at 30 to 79%.

Treatment
prometryne0
Outcome
least effectivee0
Direction
least effectivee0
Value
30 to 79%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prometryn was least effective (30 to 79%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1867–1908 · show in text ↑
t0

“Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–543 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrating effective residual herbicides into glyphosate programs to sustain cotton production.

Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Integration of effective residual herbicides into glyphosate-based management systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integration of effective residual herbicides into glyphosate-based management systems will help sustain cotton production in areas infested with Palmer amaranth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–2071 · show in text ↑

diuron · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fluometuron · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fomesafen · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.