Paper · 2004 · Weed Technology

Tropical Spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) Control in Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton

A. Stanley Culpepper; J. T. Flanders; Alan C. York; et al.

14
claims
39
verbatim quotes
65
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tropical spiderwort has recently become the most troublesome weed in Georgia cotton. Most of Georgia's cotton is glyphosate resistant (GR), and glyphosate is only marginally effective on tropical spiderwort. An experiment was conducted at four locations to determine tropical spiderwort control in GR cotton by 27 herbicide systems. Treatments consisted of three early-postemergence over-the-top (POT) herbicide options and nine late–postemergence-directed (LPD) options arranged factorially. Glyphosate POT controlled tropical spiderwort only 53% 21 d after treatment (DAT). Glyphosate plus pyrithiobac or S-metolachlor controlled tropical spiderwort 60 and 80%, respectively. Pyrithiobac improved control of emerged spiderwort, whereas S-metolachlor provided residual control. Pooled over POT treatments, glyphosate LPD controlled tropical spiderwort 70% 21 DAT. Dimethipin mixed with glyphosate did not improve control. Carfentrazone, diuron, or flumioxazin mixed with glyphosate LPD improved control 9 to 15%. MSMA and MSMA plus flumioxazin were 8 and 19% more effective than glyphosate LPD. At time of cotton harvest, systems without residual herbicides at LPD controlled tropical spiderwort 42 to 45% compared with 64 to 76% with LPD treatments that included diuron or flumioxazin.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate POT controlled tropical spiderwort 53% at 21 DAT.

Treatment
Glyphosate POTe0
Interactor
tropical spiderworte1weed
Outcome
tropical spiderworte0
Direction
controllede0
Value
53%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate POT controlled tropical spiderwort only 53% 21 d after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–574 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glyphosate POT controlled tropical spiderwort only 53% 21 d after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate plus pyrithiobac controlled tropical spiderwort 60%.

Treatment
Glyphosate plus pyrithiobace0
Interactor
tropical spiderworte1weed
Outcome
tropical spiderworte0
Direction
controllede0
Value
60e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate plus pyrithiobac or S-metolachlor controlled tropical spiderwort 60 and 80%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glyphosate POT controlled tropical spiderwort only 53% 21 d after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate plus S-metolachlor controlled tropical spiderwort 80%.

Treatment
S-metolachlore0
Interactor
tropical spiderworte1weed
Outcome
tropical spiderworte0
Direction
controllede0
Value
80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate plus pyrithiobac or S-metolachlor controlled tropical spiderwort 60 and 80%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glyphosate POT controlled tropical spiderwort only 53% 21 d after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrithiobac improved control of emerged spiderwort.

Treatment
Pyrithiobace0
Interactor
tropical spiderworte1weed
Outcome
control of emerged spiderworte0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyrithiobac improved control of emerged spiderwort, whereas S-metolachlor provided residual control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–777 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glyphosate POT controlled tropical spiderwort only 53% 21 d after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-metolachlor provided residual control.

Treatment
S-metolachlore0
Interactor
tropical spiderworte1weed
Outcome
residual controle0
Direction
providede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyrithiobac improved control of emerged spiderwort, whereas S-metolachlor provided residual control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–777 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glyphosate POT controlled tropical spiderwort only 53% 21 d after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate LPD controlled tropical spiderwort 70% at 21 DAT.

Treatment
glyphosate LPDe0
Interactor
tropical spiderworte1weed
Outcome
tropical spiderworte0
Direction
controllede0
Value
70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pooled over POT treatments, glyphosate LPD controlled tropical spiderwort 70% 21 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–863 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glyphosate POT controlled tropical spiderwort only 53% 21 d after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethipin mixed with glyphosate did not improve weed control.

Treatment
Dimethipin mixed with glyphosatee0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
did not improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dimethipin mixed with glyphosate did not improve control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carfentrazone with glyphosate LPD improved control by 9 to 15%.

Treatment
Carfentrazonee0
Interactor
tropical spiderworte1weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
improvede0
Value
9 to 15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carfentrazone, diuron, or flumioxazin mixed with glyphosate LPD improved control 9 to 15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1012 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glyphosate POT controlled tropical spiderwort only 53% 21 d after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

diuron with glyphosate LPD improved control by 9 to 15%.

Treatment
diurone0
Interactor
tropical spiderworte1weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
improvede0
Value
9 to 15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carfentrazone, diuron, or flumioxazin mixed with glyphosate LPD improved control 9 to 15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1012 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glyphosate POT controlled tropical spiderwort only 53% 21 d after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

flumioxazin with glyphosate LPD improved control by 9 to 15%.

Treatment
flumioxazine0
Interactor
tropical spiderworte1weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
improvede0
Value
9 to 15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carfentrazone, diuron, or flumioxazin mixed with glyphosate LPD improved control 9 to 15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1012 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glyphosate POT controlled tropical spiderwort only 53% 21 d after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSMA was 8% more effective than glyphosate LPD.

Treatment
MSMAe0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Value
8e0
Comparator
glyphosate LPDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MSMA and MSMA plus flumioxazin were 8 and 19% more effective than glyphosate LPD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSMA plus flumioxazin was 19% more effective than glyphosate LPD.

Treatment
MSMA plus flumioxazine0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
glyphosate LPDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MSMA and MSMA plus flumioxazin were 8 and 19% more effective than glyphosate LPD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Systems without residual herbicides controlled spiderwort 42 to 45% at harvest.

Treatment
systems without residual herbicides at LPDe0
Interactor
tropical spiderworte1weed
Outcome
tropical spiderworte0
Direction
controllede0
Value
42 to 45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At time of cotton harvest, systems without residual herbicides at LPD controlled tropical spiderwort 42 to 45% compared with 64 to 76% with LPD treatments that included diuron or flumioxazin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1286 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glyphosate POT controlled tropical spiderwort only 53% 21 d after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LPD treatments with diuron or flumioxazin controlled spiderwort 64 to 76% at harvest.

Treatment
LPD treatments that included diuron or flumioxazine0
Interactor
tropical spiderworte1weed
Outcome
tropical spiderworte0
Direction
controllede0
Value
64 to 76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At time of cotton harvest, systems without residual herbicides at LPD controlled tropical spiderwort 42 to 45% compared with 64 to 76% with LPD treatments that included diuron or flumioxazin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1286 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glyphosate POT controlled tropical spiderwort only 53% 21 d after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑

diuron · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

flumioxazin · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

diuron · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

flumioxazin · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

glyphosate · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

glyphosate · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 38 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

carfentrazone · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 21 positive, 14 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.