Abstract
Abstract We studied the effect of soil‐applied herbicides and fungicides on cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) root growth under ambient greenhouse conditions. Root growth of cotton was not affected by soil treatment with the fungicides 1‐Chloro‐2‐Nitropropane (Lanstan)3 or Pentachloronitrobenzen+ e 5‐Ethoxy‐3‐trichloromethyl‐l‐l‐l,2,4‐thiadiazole (Terraclor Super X) 3 . Trifluralin (α,α,α, trifluoro‐ 2,6‐dinitro‐ N , N ‐dipropyl‐ p ‐toluidine) applied at 0.84 kg/ha did not affect cotton roots when applied preplant and incorporated; however, the higher rate (1.68 kg/ha) significantly reduced total root growth. Fluometuron [l,l‐dimethyl‐3‐(α,α,α,‐trifluoro‐m‐tolyl)urea] was not injurious to cotton at the rate evaluated. Root growth of cotton was significantly reduced by treatment with 3.36 kg/ha of prometryne [2‐4‐bis(isopropylamino)‐6‐(methylthio)‐s‐triazine] applied as a preemergence spray. There were no significant interactions between fungicides and herbicides; however, interaction as evidenced by a reduction in total growth did occur between trifluralin and prometryne. Based on pesticides evaluated in this series of experiments, deleterious interactions as have been reported by other researchers to occur between herbicides and insecticides do not occur.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Lanstan did not significantly affect cotton root growth.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- 1‐Chloro‐2‐Nitropropane (Lanstan)e0
- Outcome
- Root growthe0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Root growth of cotton was not affected by soil treatment with the fungicides 1‐Chloro‐2‐Nitropropane (Lanstan)3 or Pentachloronitrobenzen+ e 5‐Ethoxy‐3‐trichloromethyl‐l‐l‐l,2,4‐thiadiazole (Terraclor Super X) 3”
Claim · model-written summary
Terraclor Super X did not affect cotton root growth.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- Terraclor Super Xe0
- Outcome
- Root growthe0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Root growth of cotton was not affected by soil treatment with the fungicides 1‐Chloro‐2‐Nitropropane (Lanstan)3 or Pentachloronitrobenzen+ e 5‐Ethoxy‐3‐trichloromethyl‐l‐l‐l,2,4‐thiadiazole (Terraclor Super X) 3”
Claim · model-written summary
Preplant trifluralin at 0.84 kg/ha did not affect cotton roots.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- 0.84 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- cotton rootse0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Trifluralin (α,α,α, trifluoro‐ 2,6‐dinitro‐ N , N ‐dipropyl‐ p ‐toluidine) applied at 0.84 kg/ha did not affect cotton roots when applied preplant and incorporated”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Trifluralin at 1.68 kg/ha significantly reduced total cotton root growth.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- 1.68 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- total root growthe0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the higher rate (1.68 kg/ha) significantly reduced total root growth”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Fluometuron was not injurious to cotton at the evaluated rate.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- Fluometurone0
- Outcome
- cottone0
- Direction
- not injuriouse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fluometuron [l,l‐dimethyl‐3‐(α,α,α,‐trifluoro‐m‐tolyl)urea] was not injurious to cotton at the rate evaluated”
Claim · model-written summary
Prometryne at 3.36 kg/ha significantly reduced cotton root growth.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- 3.36 kg/ha of prometrynee0
- Outcome
- Root growthe0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Root growth of cotton was significantly reduced by treatment with 3.36 kg/ha of prometryne”
Claim · model-written summary
No significant fungicide–herbicide interaction was detected.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Outcome
- interactions between fungicides and herbicidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There were no significant interactions between fungicides and herbicides”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined trifluralin and prometryne reduced total cotton growth.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- trifluralin and prometrynee0
- Outcome
- total growthe0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“interaction as evidenced by a reduction in total growth did occur between trifluralin and prometryne”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded that the tested pesticides had no deleterious interactions of the previously reported type.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Outcome
- deleterious interactionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“deleterious interactions as have been reported by other researchers to occur between herbicides and insecticides do not occur”
t0“Cotton”
The same questions in other papers
prometryn · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
fluometuron · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →trifluralin · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.