Paper · 2014

SOURCE - SINK RELATIONSHIP IN CORN AT THE COMBINATION APPLICATION OF CHEMICAL AND BIO PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER

Marzieh Salimian; Mohammadreza Naderidarbaghshahi; Farzad Fanoodi

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To study the effect of different levels of nitrogen in combination with bio-fertilizer phosphate-yield corn single cross 704 split plot experiment based on randomized complete block design with three replications, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan was implemented in 2012. Treatments consisted of four levels of nitrogen (50,100,150,200) kg ha as the main plots and three levels of bio-manure to fertilize 2 (0,100,200) grams per hectare in sub-plots were. And Single cross 704 maize varieties were used in this experiment. Results of data analysis showed that the levels of nitrogen fertilizer in combination with bio-fertilizer phosphorus on grain yield was significant However, the leaf area index at Tassel, remobilization of assimilates, the leaf phosphorus, resource constraints, soil pH levels were not significant. The results showed that the highest mean grain yield between 200 and 150 kg per hectare of nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen fertilizer is concerned. The results showed that the highest mean grain yield between 150 and 200 kg per hectare of nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen fertilizer is concerned. The comparison showed that the level of 200 grams per hectare for bio-fertilizer, bio fertilizers greatest impact (6571/30 kg ha) on grain yield. Comparison also showed interactions of biological nitrogen fertilizer, the highest seed yield of 200 kg per hectare of nitrogen fertilizer treatments with bio-fertilizer treatments were obtained from 200 g per hectare and lowest with 4460/60 kg per hectare nitrogen fertilizer treatment of 100 kg hectare biological treatment of zero g.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and phosphorus biofertilizer levels had a significant effect on corn grain yield.

Treatment
levels of nitrogen fertilizer in combination with bio-fertilizer phosphoruse0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the levels of nitrogen fertilizer in combination with bio-fertilizer phosphorus on grain yield was significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer treatments did not significantly affect tassel-stage leaf area index.

Organ / stage
Tassele0
Treatment
levels of nitrogen fertilizer in combination with bio-fertilizer phosphoruse1
Outcome
leaf area indexe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the leaf area index at Tassel, remobilization of assimilates, the leaf phosphorus, resource constraints, soil pH levels were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–820 · show in text ↑
e1

“the levels of nitrogen fertilizer in combination with bio-fertilizer phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer treatments did not significantly affect assimilate remobilization.

Treatment
levels of nitrogen fertilizer in combination with bio-fertilizer phosphoruse1
Outcome
remobilization of assimilatese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“remobilization of assimilates, the leaf phosphorus, resource constraints, soil pH levels were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–820 · show in text ↑
e1

“the levels of nitrogen fertilizer in combination with bio-fertilizer phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer treatments did not significantly affect leaf phosphorus.

Treatment
levels of nitrogen fertilizer in combination with bio-fertilizer phosphoruse1
Outcome
the leaf phosphoruse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the leaf phosphorus, resource constraints, soil pH levels were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–820 · show in text ↑
e1

“the levels of nitrogen fertilizer in combination with bio-fertilizer phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer treatments did not significantly affect resource constraints.

Treatment
levels of nitrogen fertilizer in combination with bio-fertilizer phosphoruse1
Outcome
resource constraintse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resource constraints, soil pH levels were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–820 · show in text ↑
e1

“the levels of nitrogen fertilizer in combination with bio-fertilizer phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer treatments did not significantly affect soil pH.

Treatment
levels of nitrogen fertilizer in combination with bio-fertilizer phosphoruse1
Outcome
soil pH levelse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil pH levels were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–820 · show in text ↑
e1

“the levels of nitrogen fertilizer in combination with bio-fertilizer phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield was highest at nitrogen fertilizer levels of 150 and 200 kg per hectare.

Treatment
150 and 200 kg per hectare of nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest mean grain yield between 150 and 200 kg per hectare of nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 200 g per hectare biofertilizer treatment produced the greatest grain yield, reported as 6571/30 kg ha.

Treatment
200 grams per hectare for bio-fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greateste0
Value
6571/30 kg hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the level of 200 grams per hectare for bio-fertilizer, bio fertilizers greatest impact (6571/30 kg ha) on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 200 kg per hectare nitrogen plus 200 g per hectare biofertilizer combination yielded the highest seed yield.

Treatment
200 kg per hectare of nitrogen fertilizer treatments with bio-fertilizer treatments were obtained from 200 g per hectaree0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest seed yield of 200 kg per hectare of nitrogen fertilizer treatments with bio-fertilizer treatments were obtained from 200 g per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest reported yield, 4460/60 kg per hectare, occurred at 100 kg per hectare nitrogen without biological fertilizer.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer treatment of 100 kg hectare biological treatment of zero ge0
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
loweste0
Value
4460/60 kg per hectaree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest with 4460/60 kg per hectare nitrogen fertilizer treatment of 100 kg hectare biological treatment of zero g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1599 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest seed yield of 200 kg per hectare of nitrogen fertilizer treatments with bio-fertilizer treatments were obtained from 200 g per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 62 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 252 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 252 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

339 papers: 303 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 303 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

335 papers more in this group

See all 339 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 635 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

168 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,196 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.