Paper · 2013 · Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology

Effects of Water and Nitrogen Utilized by Means of Dripping on Growth of Root and Canopy and Matter Distribution in Spring Wheat

Jichuan Wang; Cuilian Xu; Shan Gao; et al.

19
claims
39
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In order to provide scientific strategies of water and nitrogen regulation, the effects of different amount of watering and nitrogen rate by means of drip irrigation on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied by using methods of soil drill sampling and growth analysis. The results indicated that reducing drip irrigation amounts and nitrogen rate would cause root weight decreased, shoot growth reduced and yield dropped. In water deficit irrigation treatments (2400 m3/ha), root length and root surface area increased in flowering stage, but rapid declined in milking stage, that severely hampered leaf growth and grain grouting. In milking stage, appropriate irrigation amount (3600 m3/ha) could maintain higher root weight, root length and root diameter that promoted root/shoot coordinated growing. Nitrogen deficiency significantly reduced dry matter accumulation amount of stem in flowering stage and root length and root surface area in milking stage, that was not conductive to the extension and fulfilling of roots functions and leaded to canopy severely premature aging. High nitrogen supply (urea 450 kg/ha) would cause vigorously growing of shoot and declining of the growth quality of spike and decreasing of the economic coefficient. Water and nitrogen had significant collaborative compensation effects on root/shoot growth and yield traits and the effects of regulating water by nitrogen supply on root traits was larger than on shoot, while regulating nitrogen by water supply on shoot traits was larger than on root, so in actual production, it was necessary to maintain a high level of nitrogen supply in flowering stage but a appropriate level of water supply in milking stage. The drip irrigation amounts and nitrogen rate and yield components indicators in high-yielding drip irrigation wheat field were put forward by analyzing quadratic polynomial equation built by the data of water and nitrogen two factors field experiments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing drip irrigation and nitrogen rate decreased root weight in wheat.

Treatment
reducing drip irrigation amounts and nitrogen ratee1
Outcome
root weighte1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“reducing drip irrigation amounts and nitrogen rate would cause root weight decreased, shoot growth reduced and yield dropped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing drip irrigation and nitrogen rate reduced shoot growth in wheat.

Treatment
reducing drip irrigation amounts and nitrogen ratee1
Outcome
shoot growthe1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“reducing drip irrigation amounts and nitrogen rate would cause root weight decreased, shoot growth reduced and yield dropped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing drip irrigation and nitrogen rate dropped wheat yield.

Treatment
reducing drip irrigation amounts and nitrogen ratee1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
droppede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“reducing drip irrigation amounts and nitrogen rate would cause root weight decreased, shoot growth reduced and yield dropped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water deficit irrigation, root length and root surface area increased at flowering.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee2
Treatment
water deficit irrigation treatments (2400 m3/ha)e2
Outcome
root length and root surface areae2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e2

“In water deficit irrigation treatments (2400 m3/ha), root length and root surface area increased in flowering stage, but rapid declined in milking stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water deficit irrigation, root length and root surface area rapidly declined at milking.

Organ / stage
milking stagee2
Treatment
water deficit irrigation treatments (2400 m3/ha)e2
Outcome
root length and root surface areae2
Direction
rapid declinede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e2

“In water deficit irrigation treatments (2400 m3/ha), root length and root surface area increased in flowering stage, but rapid declined in milking stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water deficit irrigation, the decline at milking severely hampered leaf growth and grain grouting.

Treatment
water deficit irrigation treatments (2400 m3/ha)e2
Outcome
leaf growth and grain groutinge3
Direction
severely hamperede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e2

“In water deficit irrigation treatments (2400 m3/ha), root length and root surface area increased in flowering stage, but rapid declined in milking stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–599 · show in text ↑
e3

“that severely hampered leaf growth and grain grouting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Appropriate irrigation (3600 m3/ha) at milking maintained higher root weight, root length and root diameter.

Organ / stage
milking stagee4
Treatment
appropriate irrigation amount (3600 m3/ha)e4
Outcome
root weight, root length and root diametere4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e4

“In milking stage, appropriate irrigation amount (3600 m3/ha) could maintain higher root weight, root length and root diameter that promoted root/shoot coordinated growing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen deficiency significantly reduced stem dry matter accumulation at flowering.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee5
Treatment
Nitrogen deficiencye5
Outcome
dry matter accumulation amount of steme5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e5

“Nitrogen deficiency significantly reduced dry matter accumulation amount of stem in flowering stage and root length and root surface area in milking stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen deficiency significantly reduced root length and root surface area at milking.

Organ / stage
milking stagee5
Treatment
Nitrogen deficiencye5
Outcome
root length and root surface areae5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e5

“Nitrogen deficiency significantly reduced dry matter accumulation amount of stem in flowering stage and root length and root surface area in milking stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen deficiency led to severely premature canopy aging.

Treatment
Nitrogen deficiencye5
Outcome
canopy severely premature aginge6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e5

“Nitrogen deficiency significantly reduced dry matter accumulation amount of stem in flowering stage and root length and root surface area in milking stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–982 · show in text ↑
e6

“leaded to canopy severely premature aging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen supply (urea 450 kg/ha) caused vigorous growth of shoot.

Treatment
High nitrogen supply (urea 450 kg/ha)e7
Outcome
growing of shoote7
Direction
vigorously growinge7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e7

“High nitrogen supply (urea 450 kg/ha) would cause vigorously growing of shoot and declining of the growth quality of spike and decreasing of the economic coefficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen supply (urea 450 kg/ha) declined the growth quality of spike.

Treatment
High nitrogen supply (urea 450 kg/ha)e7
Outcome
growth quality of spikee7
Direction
declininge7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e7

“High nitrogen supply (urea 450 kg/ha) would cause vigorously growing of shoot and declining of the growth quality of spike and decreasing of the economic coefficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen supply (urea 450 kg/ha) decreased the economic coefficient.

Treatment
High nitrogen supply (urea 450 kg/ha)e7
Outcome
economic coefficiente7
Direction
decreasinge7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e7

“High nitrogen supply (urea 450 kg/ha) would cause vigorously growing of shoot and declining of the growth quality of spike and decreasing of the economic coefficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1271 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water and nitrogen had significant collaborative compensation effects on root/shoot growth and yield traits.

Treatment
Water and nitrogene6
Outcome
root/shoot growth and yield traitse6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e6

“Water and nitrogen had significant collaborative compensation effects on root/shoot growth and yield traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1380 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regulating water by nitrogen supply affected root traits more than shoot traits.

Treatment
regulating water by nitrogen supplye7
Outcome
root traitse7
Direction
largere7
Comparator
shoote7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e7

“the effects of regulating water by nitrogen supply on root traits was larger than on shoot, while regulating nitrogen by water supply on shoot traits was larger than on root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1558 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regulating nitrogen by water supply affected shoot traits more than root traits.

Treatment
regulating nitrogen by water supplye7
Outcome
shoot traitse7
Direction
largere7
Comparator
roote7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e7

“the effects of regulating water by nitrogen supply on root traits was larger than on shoot, while regulating nitrogen by water supply on shoot traits was larger than on root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1558 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A high level of nitrogen supply in flowering stage should be maintained in wheat production.

Outcome
maintain a high level of nitrogen supply in flowering stagee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e6

“it was necessary to maintain a high level of nitrogen supply in flowering stage but a appropriate level of water supply in milking stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1721 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

An appropriate level of water supply in milking stage should be maintained in wheat production.

Outcome
appropriate level of water supply in milking stagee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on root/shoot growth and matter distribution in wheat were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–232 · show in text ↑
e6

“it was necessary to maintain a high level of nitrogen supply in flowering stage but a appropriate level of water supply in milking stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1721 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation amounts and nitrogen rate are recommended for high-yielding drip irrigation wheat fields.

Outcome
drip irrigation amounts and nitrogen ratee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The drip irrigation amounts and nitrogen rate and yield components indicators in high-yielding drip irrigation wheat field were put forward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1862 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

94 papers: 74 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 74 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 343 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.