Paper · 2018 · Scientific Reports

Mechanisms of wheat (Triticum aestivum) grain storage proteins in response to nitrogen application and its impacts on processing quality

Ting Zheng; Peng-Fei Qi; Yong-Li Cao; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
50
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Basis for the effects of nitrogen (N) on wheat grain storage proteins (GSPs) and on the establishment of processing quality are far from clear. The response of GSPs and processing quality parameters to four N levels of four common wheat cultivars were investigated at two sites over two growing seasons. Except gluten index (GI), processing quality parameters as well as GSPs quantities were remarkably improved by increasing N level. N level explained 4.2~59.2% and 10.4~80.0% variability in GSPs fractions and processing quality parameters, respectively. The amount of N remobilized from vegetative organs except spike was significantly increased when enhancing N application. GSPs fractions and processing quality parameters except GI were only highly and positively correlated with the amount of N remobilized from stem with sheath. N reassimilation in grain was remarkably strengthened by the elevated activity and expression level of glutamine synthetase. Transcriptome analysis showed the molecular mechanism of seeds in response to N levels during 10~35 days post anthesis. Collectively, we provided comprehensive understanding of N-responding mechanisms with respect to wheat processing quality from N source to GSPs biosynthesis at the agronomic, physiological and molecular levels, and screened candidate genes for quality breeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen improved processing quality parameters except gluten index.

Treatment
increasing N levele0
Outcome
processing quality parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
Except gluten index (GI)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Except gluten index (GI), processing quality parameters as well as GSPs quantities were remarkably improved by increasing N level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–434 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen improved grain storage protein quantities.

Treatment
increasing N levele0
Outcome
GSPs quantitiese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Except gluten index (GI), processing quality parameters as well as GSPs quantities were remarkably improved by increasing N level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–434 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level explained 4.2~59.2% of variability in storage protein fractions.

Treatment
N levele0
Outcome
GSPs fractionse0
Value
4.2~59.2%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N level explained 4.2~59.2% and 10.4~80.0% variability in GSPs fractions and processing quality parameters, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–556 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level explained 10.4~80.0% of variability in processing quality parameters.

Treatment
N levele0
Outcome
processing quality parameterse0
Value
10.4~80.0%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N level explained 4.2~59.2% and 10.4~80.0% variability in GSPs fractions and processing quality parameters, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–556 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced nitrogen application significantly increased remobilization from vegetative organs except spike.

Organ / stage
vegetative organse0
Treatment
enhancing N applicatione0
Outcome
amount of N remobilizede0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
except spikee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of N remobilized from vegetative organs except spike was significantly increased when enhancing N application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage protein fractions and quality parameters except GI correlated positively with nitrogen remobilized from stem with sheath.

Organ / stage
stem with sheathe0
Compound
Ne0
Outcome
GSPs fractions and processing quality parameterse0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Qualifier
except GIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GSPs fractions and processing quality parameters except GI were only highly and positively correlated with the amount of N remobilized from stem with sheath.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated glutamine synthetase activity and expression strengthened nitrogen reassimilation in grain.

Organ / stage
graine0
Gene
glutamine synthetasee0
Outcome
N reassimilatione0
Direction
strengthenede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N reassimilation in grain was remarkably strengthened by the elevated activity and expression level of glutamine synthetase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transcriptomics revealed seed molecular responses to nitrogen during 10~35 days post anthesis.

Outcome
molecular mechanism of seeds in response to N levelse0
Qualifier
during 10~35 days post anthesise0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transcriptome analysis showed the molecular mechanism of seeds in response to N levels during 10~35 days post anthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Candidate genes were screened for wheat quality breeding.

Outcome
candidate genes for quality breedinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“screened candidate genes for quality breeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

94 papers: 74 positive, 20 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.