Paper · 2011 · Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment

Morphological traits, yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars under drought stress condition in Kerman province

Ali Soleymani; Mohamad Hesam Shahrajabian; Seyed Hossein Hosseini Far; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

According to the increasing need of our country to edible oil and also according to the limit of country water sources and its effect on yield and production of oil plants, an experiment was conducted in order to evaluate the response of safflower to drought stress, in a split plot arrangement based on randomized complete block design with three replications at Research Farm, Research Center of Kerman Agricultural Institute. The main plots included four irrigation levels (complete irrigation, irrigation disruption from the flowering stage, irrigation disruption from the heading-bud and irrigation disruption from stem elongation) and the secondary plots included three cultivars of safflower (Esfahan local, Kerman local and IL genotype). The results of this experiment showed that irrigation disruption in all stages caused a significant reduction of plant height, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter at max LAI, seed yield and components, biological yield, harvest index, oil percentage and oil yield. Maximum seed and oil yield was obtained in normal irrigation treatment, and irrigation disruption from flowering, heading-bud and stem elongation stages were in the next ranks, respectively. Among the cultivars, the highest and lowest seed yield was related to IL and Kerman local, respectively. Also among the yield components, number of seeds per head had the highest correlation with the grain yield. In overall, the results of this study showed that supplying suitable water amount during the growth period and sowing the Esfahan local cultivar prepare best yield production possibility. In contrast, with the limit in water sources and the possibility of encountering of the plant with drought stress during the growth period, IL cultivar is better than the other cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation disruption reduced plant height, leaf area index, and dry matter at maximum LAI significantly.

Treatment
irrigation disruption in all stagese0
Outcome
plant height, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter at max LAIe0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation disruption in all stages caused a significant reduction of plant height, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter at max LAI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation disruption significantly reduced seed yield and components, biological yield, and harvest index.

Treatment
irrigation disruption in all stagese0
Outcome
seed yield and components, biological yield, harvest indexe0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation disruption in all stages caused a significant reduction of plant height, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter at max LAI, seed yield and components, biological yield, harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation disruption significantly reduced oil percentage and oil yield.

Treatment
irrigation disruption in all stagese0
Outcome
oil percentage and oil yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation disruption in all stages caused a significant reduction of plant height, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter at max LAI, seed yield and components, biological yield, harvest index, oil percentage and oil yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal irrigation produced maximum seed and oil yield, followed by disruption from flowering, heading-bud, and stem elongation.

Treatment
normal irrigation treatmente0
Outcome
seed and oil yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Comparator
irrigation disruption from flowering, heading-bud and stem elongation stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum seed and oil yield was obtained in normal irrigation treatment, and irrigation disruption from flowering, heading-bud and stem elongation stages were in the next ranks, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IL had the highest seed yield and Kerman local the lowest.

Material
ILe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Kerman locale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest and lowest seed yield was related to IL and Kerman local, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds per head had the highest correlation with grain yield among yield components.

Organ / stage
seeds per heade0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of seeds per head had the highest correlation with the grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1411 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend suitable water and Esfahan local for best yield.

Material
Esfahan locale0
Outcome
best yield production possibilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supplying suitable water amount during the growth period and sowing the Esfahan local cultivar prepare best yield production possibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1599 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Under limited water and drought risk, IL is preferred over other cultivars.

Material
IL cultivare0
Outcome
better than the other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the limit in water sources and the possibility of encountering of the plant with drought stress during the growth period, IL cultivar is better than the other cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1787 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

irrigation · quality: oil · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 10 positive, 8 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 39 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

loss of function · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.