Paper · 1975 · Physiologia Plantarum

Emergence and Seedling Growth of a Cultivated and a Wild Strain of Safflower under Various Amounts of Simulated Rainfall

ABDOLLAH BASSIRI; NASSER SIONIT

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Two separate experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of different planting depths and irrigation regimes on the emergence and seedling heights of a cultivated ( Carthamus tinctorius L. cv. Arak 2811) and a wild strain ( C. oxyacantha Bieb.) of safflower. In the first experiment, three planting depths (0.5, 2.0 and 3.5 cm) and four water levels (6,9,12, and 15 mm) were used. Water was applied only once at the start of the experiment. For Arak 2811, the highest emergence percentage and seedling height were obtained when seeds were planted 0.5 cm deep in the soil and irrigated with the equivalent of 12 mm of rainfall. In the second experiment, five water levels (3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 mm) were applied at 3‐day intervals for a period of 25 days and the planting depth was 0.5 cm. For Arak 2811, the seedlings emerged within 4 to 7 days after the first watering while for the wild strain, the emergence started on the 4th day and continued up to the 17th day. The emergence percentage of the wild safflower was almost half of that of the cultivated strain. However, the emerged wild seedlings were much more resistant to low available water than the seedlings of the cultivated variety of safflower.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arak 2811 had its highest emergence percentage at 0.5 cm depth and 12 mm irrigation.

Material
Arak 2811e0
Treatment
0.5 cm deep in the soil and irrigated with the equivalent of 12 mm of rainfalle0
Outcome
emergence percentagee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Arak 2811, the highest emergence percentage and seedling height were obtained when seeds were planted 0.5 cm deep in the soil and irrigated with the equivalent of 12 mm of rainfall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arak 2811 had its highest seedling height at 0.5 cm depth and 12 mm irrigation.

Material
Arak 2811e0
Treatment
0.5 cm deep in the soil and irrigated with the equivalent of 12 mm of rainfalle0
Outcome
seedling heighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Arak 2811, the highest emergence percentage and seedling height were obtained when seeds were planted 0.5 cm deep in the soil and irrigated with the equivalent of 12 mm of rainfall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arak 2811 seedlings emerged within 4 to 7 days after first watering.

Material
Arak 2811e0
Outcome
seedlings emergede0
Value
4 to 7 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Arak 2811, the seedlings emerged within 4 to 7 days after the first watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild safflower emergence started on day 4 and continued to day 17.

Material
wild straine0
Outcome
emergencee0
Value
the 4th daye0
Qualifier
continued up to the 17th daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the wild strain, the emergence started on the 4th day and continued up to the 17th day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild safflower emergence percentage was almost half that of cultivated safflower.

Taxon
wild safflowerCarthamus oxyacanthuse0
Outcome
emergence percentagee0
Direction
almost halfe0
Comparator
cultivated straine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus oxyacanthus
Carthamus oxyacanthus · TaxonG'ofurova Gulxayo · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The emergence percentage of the wild safflower was almost half of that of the cultivated strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1079 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emerged wild seedlings were much more resistant to low available water than cultivated safflower seedlings.

Material
wild seedlingse0
Outcome
resistant to low available watere0
Direction
much more resistante0
Comparator
cultivated variety of safflowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the emerged wild seedlings were much more resistant to low available water than the seedlings of the cultivated variety of safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1222 · show in text ↑

rainfall · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.