Paper · 2009 · Acta Phytopathologica Sinica

Screening fungicide for pathogen inhibition and disease control of apple tree valsa canker.

Lei Wang; Gao ZuoPeng; Lili Huang; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The inhibitory effects of 10 fungicides on apple tree valsa canker were compared on dishes and twigs.The results showed that conidia germination and mycelial growth were inhibited by all fungicedes tested.The EC50 value of Difenoconazole was 6.1×10-3 μg·mL-1,the lowest among tested fungicide in inhi-biting conidia germination.Tebuconazole and Imazalil also showed obvious inhibition effect.Thiophanate-methyl was the least efficient with the EC50 value 2.6×101 μg·mL-1.Difenoconazole also showed the highest activity for inhibiting mycelial growth with EC50 value of2.3×10-2 μg·mL-1.Tebuconazole was better than other fungicide.Thiophanate-methyl and Propineb were the least efficient with quite high EC50 value.Furthermore,the size of the lesion after inoculation on excised twigs also revealed that Difenoconazole was most efficient because it showed the smallest lesion of 394 mm2 compared with other tested fungicides.So Difenoconazole and Tebuconazole could be used to control apple tree valsa canker in field to subsititute forbided fungicides such as asomate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested fungicides inhibited conidia germination and mycelial growth of the apple valsa canker agent.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticae0
Treatment
10 fungicidese0
Outcome
conidia germination and mycelial growthe1
Direction
inhibitede1
Setting
dishes and twigse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibitory effects of 10 fungicides on apple tree valsa canker were compared on dishes and twigs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“conidia germination and mycelial growth were inhibited by all fungicedes tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole had the lowest EC50 for inhibiting conidia germination among the tested fungicides.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticae0
Treatment
Difenoconazolee2
Outcome
EC50 valuee2
Direction
loweste2
Value
6.1×10-3 μg·mL-1e2
Comparator
tested fungicidee2
Setting
dishes and twigse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibitory effects of 10 fungicides on apple tree valsa canker were compared on dishes and twigs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“The EC50 value of Difenoconazole was 6.1×10-3 μg·mL-1,the lowest among tested fungicide in inhi-biting conidia germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole and Imazalil showed an obvious inhibition effect on the apple valsa canker agent.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticae0
Treatment
Tebuconazole and Imazalile3
Outcome
inhibition effecte3
Setting
dishes and twigse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibitory effects of 10 fungicides on apple tree valsa canker were compared on dishes and twigs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e3

“Tebuconazole and Imazalil also showed obvious inhibition effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiophanate-methyl was the least efficient fungicide, with an EC50 of 2.6×101 μg·mL-1 for the apple valsa canker agent.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticae0
Treatment
Thiophanate-methyle4
Outcome
EC50 valuee4
Direction
least efficiente4
Value
2.6×101 μg·mL-1e4
Setting
dishes and twigse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibitory effects of 10 fungicides on apple tree valsa canker were compared on dishes and twigs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“Thiophanate-methyl was the least efficient with the EC50 value 2.6×101 μg·mL-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole had the highest activity for inhibiting mycelial growth, with an EC50 of 2.3×10-2 μg·mL-1.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticae0
Treatment
Difenoconazolee5
Outcome
mycelial growthe5
Direction
highest activitye5
Value
2.3×10-2 μg·mL-1e5
Setting
dishes and twigse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibitory effects of 10 fungicides on apple tree valsa canker were compared on dishes and twigs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“Difenoconazole also showed the highest activity for inhibiting mycelial growth with EC50 value of2.3×10-2 μg·mL-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole was better than the other fungicides in the tested assays.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticae0
Treatment
Tebuconazolee6
Outcome
better than other fungicidee6
Direction
bettere6
Comparator
other fungicidee6
Setting
dishes and twigse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibitory effects of 10 fungicides on apple tree valsa canker were compared on dishes and twigs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e6

“Tebuconazole was better than other fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiophanate-methyl and Propineb were the least efficient fungicides, with quite high EC50 values.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticae0
Treatment
Thiophanate-methyl and Propinebe7
Outcome
EC50 valuee7
Direction
least efficiente7
Setting
dishes and twigse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibitory effects of 10 fungicides on apple tree valsa canker were compared on dishes and twigs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e7

“Thiophanate-methyl and Propineb were the least efficient with quite high EC50 value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–713 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole gave the smallest lesion on excised apple twigs, 394 mm2, compared with the other tested fungicides.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticae0
Treatment
Difenoconazolee1
Outcome
size of the lesione1
Direction
smalleste1
Value
394 mm2e1
Comparator
other tested fungicidese1
Setting
excised twigse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibitory effects of 10 fungicides on apple tree valsa canker were compared on dishes and twigs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“the size of the lesion after inoculation on excised twigs also revealed that Difenoconazole was most efficient because it showed the smallest lesion of 394 mm2 compared with other tested fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–923 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole and Tebuconazole could be used to control apple tree valsa canker in the field.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticae0
Treatment
Difenoconazole and Tebuconazolee0
Outcome
control apple tree valsa cankere0
Setting
in fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“So Difenoconazole and Tebuconazole could be used to control apple tree valsa canker in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1016 · show in text ↑

difenoconazole · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

enilconazole · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tebuconazole · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fungicide · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.