Abstract
Tufted apple bud moth (TABM) damage had little or no effect onthe soluble solids, starch, or firmness of stored apples. Decay increasedfrom 0% to 18% in `Golden Delicious' and from 2% to 6% in `Delicious' between control fruit and those with the most TABMdamage (> 10 mm aggregate diameter, significant linear relationships R 2 = 0.41 and 0.12, respectively). Weight loss increased 2- to 3-fold in apples in the highest damage category. These results show that the post-storage quality of apples with slight TABM damage (<5 mm aggregate diameter) does not decline more rapidly than undamaged fruit. The best controlled atmospheres for storing undamaged fruit were also the best for storing damaged fruit. Widely varying fungicide spray programs did not influence the quality or decay levels of apples following storage. However, even those fruit from blocks with few or no sprays had very little decay due either to low inoculum or unfavorable environmental conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Tufted apple bud moth damage had little or no effect on soluble solids, starch or firmness of stored apples.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae1 - Treatment
- Tufted apple bud moth (TABM) damagee1
- Interactor
- Tufted apple bud mothe1pest
- Outcome
- soluble solids, starch, or firmnesse1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Tufted apple bud moth (TABM) damage had little or no effect onthe soluble solids, starch, or firmness of stored apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Decay increased from 0% to 18% in Golden Delicious apples between control fruit and fruit with the most TABM damage (significant linear relationship, R2 = 0.41).
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticae1
- Material
- Golden Deliciouse2
- Treatment
- TABM damagee2
- Interactor
- TABMe2pest
- Outcome
- Decaye2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 0% to 18%e2
- Qualifier
- R 2 = 0.41e2
- Comparator
- control fruite2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“stored apples”
e2“Decay increasedfrom 0% to 18% in `Golden Delicious' and from 2% to 6% in `Delicious' between control fruit and those with the most TABMdamage (> 10 mm aggregate diameter, significant linear relationships R 2 = 0.41 and 0.12, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Decay increased from 2% to 6% in Delicious apples between control fruit and fruit with the most TABM damage.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticae1
- Material
- Deliciouse2
- Treatment
- TABM damagee2
- Interactor
- TABMe2pest
- Outcome
- Decaye2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 2% to 6%e2
- Comparator
- control fruite2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“stored apples”
e2“Decay increasedfrom 0% to 18% in `Golden Delicious' and from 2% to 6% in `Delicious' between control fruit and those with the most TABMdamage (> 10 mm aggregate diameter, significant linear relationships R 2 = 0.41 and 0.12, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Weight loss increased 2- to 3-fold in apples in the highest TABM damage category.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticae3
- Treatment
- highest damage categorye3
- Outcome
- Weight losse3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 2- to 3-folde3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Weight loss increased 2- to 3-fold in apples in the highest damage category”
Claim · model-written summary
Post-storage quality of apples with slight TABM damage does not decline more rapidly than in undamaged fruit.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticae4
- Treatment
- slight TABM damage (<5 mm aggregate diameter)e4
- Interactor
- TABMe4pest
- Outcome
- post-storage qualitye4
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede4
- Comparator
- undamaged fruite4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“These results show that the post-storage quality of apples with slight TABM damage (<5 mm aggregate diameter) does not decline more rapidly than undamaged fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
The best controlled atmospheres for storing undamaged apples were also the best for storing damaged apples.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticae5
- Treatment
- controlled atmospherese6
- Outcome
- best controlled atmospheres for storing undamaged fruite6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“stored apples”
e6“The best controlled atmospheres for storing undamaged fruit were also the best for storing damaged fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
Widely varying fungicide spray programs did not influence the quality or decay levels of apples after storage.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticae7
- Treatment
- Widely varying fungicide spray programse7
- Outcome
- quality or decay levelse7
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“Widely varying fungicide spray programs did not influence the quality or decay levels of apples following storage”
Claim · model-written summary
Apples from blocks with few or no sprays had very little decay after storage, attributed to low inoculum or unfavorable environmental conditions.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- few or no sprayse2
- Outcome
- decaye2
- Qualifier
- low inoculum or unfavorable environmental conditionse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“stored apples”
e2“even those fruit from blocks with few or no sprays had very little decay due either to low inoculum or unfavorable environmental conditions”
The same questions in other papers
fungicide · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →application · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
103 papers more in this group
See all 107 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.