Paper · 2020 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Growth, yield, water use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under different sowing dates, planting methods and irrigation treatments

L K DHALIWAL; G S BUTTAR; P K KINGRA; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at the Research Farm, Department of Climate Change and Agricultural Meteorology, PAU, Ludhiana during rabi seasons of 2014-15 and 2015-16. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) variety WH-1105 was sown on 10th and 30th November under two planting methods (flat and bed) with three irrigation treatments (I1- three post-sowing irrigations at crown root initiation (20-25 days after sowing), flag leaf emergence (70-80 days after sowing) and soft dough stages (115-120 days after sowing), I2- I1+ fourth irrigation during last week of March (Hard dough stage) and I3- Recommended four post-sowing irrigations (crown root initiation, tillering, jointing/booting and milking) in sub-sub plots replicated four times. The experiment was planned to study the effect of sowing dates, planting methods and irrigation treatments on growth, yield and water use efficiency of wheat. Dry matter accumulation and leaf area index showed significant differences between different dates of sowing and planting methods during entire growing period however significant differences among irrigation treatments were observed at 120 DAS during both the seasons. The grain yield and water use efficiency was higher in 10th November sowing as compared to 30th November as well as under bed planting compared to flat planting. However by giving one extra irrigation during end of March under I2, the increase in grain yield was up to 6-13% over I3 and I1 treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter accumulation and leaf area index differed significantly by sowing date and planting method.

Treatment
different dates of sowing and planting methodse0
Outcome
Dry matter accumulation and leaf area indexe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dry matter accumulation and leaf area index showed significant differences between different dates of sowing and planting methods during entire growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter accumulation and leaf area index differed significantly by irrigation at 120 DAS.

Treatment
irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
differencese0
Qualifier
120 DASe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant differences among irrigation treatments were observed at 120 DAS during both the seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

November 10 sowing gave higher grain yield than November 30 sowing.

Treatment
10th November sowinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
30th Novembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The grain yield and water use efficiency was higher in 10th November sowing as compared to 30th November as well as under bed planting compared to flat planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

November 10 sowing gave higher water use efficiency than November 30 sowing.

Treatment
10th November sowinge0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
30th Novembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The grain yield and water use efficiency was higher in 10th November sowing as compared to 30th November as well as under bed planting compared to flat planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed planting gave higher grain yield than flat planting.

Treatment
bed plantinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
flat plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The grain yield and water use efficiency was higher in 10th November sowing as compared to 30th November as well as under bed planting compared to flat planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed planting gave higher water use efficiency than flat planting.

Treatment
bed plantinge0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
flat plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The grain yield and water use efficiency was higher in 10th November sowing as compared to 30th November as well as under bed planting compared to flat planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An extra late March irrigation increased grain yield up to 6-13% over I3 and I1.

Treatment
one extra irrigation during end of March under I2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
6-13%e0
Comparator
I3 and I1 treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“by giving one extra irrigation during end of March under I2, the increase in grain yield was up to 6-13% over I3 and I1 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1465 · show in text ↑

tillage · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

117 papers: 97 positive, 20 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Full irrigation on raised beds produced the highest grain yield, 4.66 t/ha.

    Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Raised Bed Wheat Cultivation · 2017 · compared with irrigation up to 100% FC at same stages on flat bed

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Full irrigation on raised beds produced the highest grain yield, 4.66 t/ha.

    Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Raised Bed Wheat Cultivation · 2017 · compared with irrigation up to 100% FC at same stages on flat bed

    Same directionCited by this paper

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.