Paper · 2002 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Plant allocation to defensive compounds: interactions between elevated CO2 and nitrogen in transgenic cotton plants

C. E. Coviella

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
217
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Plant allocation to defensive compounds in response to growth in elevated atmospheric CO(2) in combination with two levels of nitrogen was examined. The aim was to discover if allocation patterns of transgenic plants containing genes for defensive chemicals which had not evolved in the species would respond as predicted by the Carbon Nutrient Balance (CNB) hypothesis. Cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum L.) were sown inside 12 environmental chambers. Six of them were maintained at an elevated CO(2) level of 900 micromol mol(-1) and the other six at the current level of approximately 370 micromol mol(-1). Half the plants in each chamber were from a transgenic line producing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin and the others were from a near isogenic line without the Bt gene. The allocation to total phenolics, condensed tannins, and gossypol and related terpenoid aldehydes was measured. All the treatments were bioassayed against a non-target insect herbivore found on cotton, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Plants had lower N concentrations and higher C:N ratios when grown in elevated CO(2). Carbon defensive compounds increased in elevated CO(2), low N availability or both. The increase in these compounds in elevated CO(2) and low N, adversely affected growth and survival of S. exigua. The production of the nitrogen-based toxin was affected by an interaction between CO(2) and N; elevated CO(2) decreased N allocation to Bt, but the reduction was largely alleviated by the addition of nitrogen. The CNB hypothesis accurately predicted only some of the results, and may require revision. These data indicate that for the future expected elevated CO(2) concentrations, plant allocation to defensive compounds will be affected enough to impact plant-herbivore interactions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 lowered cotton nitrogen concentration.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
N concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants had lower N concentrations and higher C:N ratios when grown in elevated CO(2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 raised the cotton carbon to nitrogen ratio.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
C:N ratiose0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants had lower N concentrations and higher C:N ratios when grown in elevated CO(2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2, low nitrogen, or both increased carbon defensive compounds in cotton.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
elevated CO(2), low N availability or bothe0
Outcome
Carbon defensive compoundse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbon defensive compounds increased in elevated CO(2), low N availability or both.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton defenses under elevated CO2 and low nitrogen adversely affected Spodoptera exigua growth.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
elevated CO(2) and low Ne0
Interactor
Spodoptera exiguaSpodoptera exiguae1herbivore
Outcome
growth and survival of S. exiguae0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera exigua
Spodoptera exigua · InteractorDumi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in these compounds in elevated CO(2) and low N, adversely affected growth and survival of S. exigua.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1320 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spodoptera exigua (Hübner)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased cotton nitrogen allocation to Bt toxin.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
N allocation to Bte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated CO(2) decreased N allocation to Bt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1459 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added nitrogen largely alleviated the elevated CO2 reduction in cotton nitrogen allocation to Bt.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
addition of nitrogene0
Outcome
N allocation to Bte1
Direction
alleviatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduction was largely alleviated by the addition of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1529 · show in text ↑
e1

“elevated CO(2) decreased N allocation to Bt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1459 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–115 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CNB hypothesis predicted only some cotton defense results.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
accurately predicted only some of the resultse0
Comparator
CNB hypothesise0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CNB hypothesis accurately predicted only some of the results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1595 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–115 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that the CNB hypothesis may require revision.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
may require revisione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CNB hypothesis accurately predicted only some of the results, and may require revision.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1622 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–115 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors expect future elevated CO2 to affect cotton defensive allocation enough to affect plant herbivore interactions.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
elevated CO(2) concentrationse0
Outcome
plant-herbivore interactionse0
Qualifier
future expectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the future expected elevated CO(2) concentrations, plant allocation to defensive compounds will be affected enough to impact plant-herbivore interactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1805 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–115 · show in text ↑

co2 · Spodoptera exigua · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

co2 · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 6 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.