Paper · 2005 · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Effects of elevated CO2 and transgenic Bt cotton on plant chemistry, performance, and feeding of an insect herbivore, the cotton bollworm

Fajun Chen; Gang Wu; Feng Ge; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
142
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Effects of elevated atmospheric CO 2 (double‐ambient CO 2 ) on the growth and metabolism of cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), fed on transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner) (Bt) cotton [ Cry1A(c) ], grown in open‐top chambers, were studied. Two levels of CO 2 (ambient and double‐ambient) and two cotton cultivars (non‐transgenic Simian‐3 and transgenic GK‐12) were deployed in a completely randomized design with four treatment combinations, and the cotton bollworm was reared on each treatment simultaneously. Plants of both cotton cultivars had lower nitrogen and higher total non‐structural carbohydrates (TNC), TNC:Nitrogen ratio, condensed tannin, and gossypol under elevated CO 2 . Elevated CO 2 further resulted in a significant decrease in Bt toxin level in GK‐12. The changes in chemical components in the host plants due to increased CO 2 significantly affected the growth parameters of H. armigera . Both transgenic Bt cotton and elevated CO 2 resulted in a reduced body mass, lower fecundity, decreased relative growth rate (RGR), and decreased mean relative growth rate in the bollworms. Larval life‐span was significantly longer for H. armigera fed transgenic Bt cotton. Significantly reduced larval, pupal, and adult moth weights were observed in the bollworms fed elevated CO 2 ‐grown transgenic Bt cotton compared with those of bollworms reared on non‐transgenic cotton, regardless of the CO 2 level. The efficiency of conversion of ingested food and of digested food of the bollworm were significantly reduced when fed transgenic Bt cotton, but there was no significant CO 2 or CO 2 × cotton cultivar interaction. Approximate digestibility of larvae reared on transgenic cotton grown in elevated CO 2 was higher compared to that of larvae fed non‐transgenic cotton grown at ambient CO 2 . The damage inflicted by cotton bollworm on cotton, regardless of the presence or absence of insecticidal genes, is predicted to be more serious under elevated CO 2 conditions because of individual compensatory feeding on host plants caused by nitrogen deficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 lowered nitrogen in both cotton cultivars.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants of both cotton cultivars had lower nitrogen and higher total non‐structural carbohydrates (TNC), TNC:Nitrogen ratio, condensed tannin, and gossypol under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton on plant chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 raised TNC, TNC:nitrogen ratio and condensed tannin in both cotton cultivars.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
total non‐structural carbohydrates (TNC), TNC:Nitrogen ratio, condensed tannine0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants of both cotton cultivars had lower nitrogen and higher total non‐structural carbohydrates (TNC), TNC:Nitrogen ratio, condensed tannin, and gossypol under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton on plant chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 raised gossypol in both cotton cultivars.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
gossypole0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants of both cotton cultivars had lower nitrogen and higher total non‐structural carbohydrates (TNC), TNC:Nitrogen ratio, condensed tannin, and gossypol under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton on plant chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 significantly lowered Bt toxin in GK-12.

Material
GK‐12e0
Treatment
Elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
Bt toxin levele0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated CO 2 further resulted in a significant decrease in Bt toxin level in GK‐12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton on plant chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton reduced bollworm body mass, fecundity and growth rates.

Treatment
transgenic Bt cottone0
Interactor
bollwormsHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
body mass, lower fecundity, decreased relative growth rate (RGR)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both transgenic Bt cotton and elevated CO 2 resulted in a reduced body mass, lower fecundity, decreased relative growth rate (RGR), and decreased mean relative growth rate in the bollworms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton on plant chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced bollworm body mass, fecundity and growth rates.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Interactor
bollwormsHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
body mass, lower fecundity, decreased relative growth rate (RGR)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both transgenic Bt cotton and elevated CO 2 resulted in a reduced body mass, lower fecundity, decreased relative growth rate (RGR), and decreased mean relative growth rate in the bollworms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton on plant chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bollworm larval lifespan was longer on Bt cotton.

Treatment
transgenic Bt cottone0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
Larval life‐spane0
Direction
longere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Larval life‐span was significantly longer for H. armigera fed transgenic Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton on plant chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bollworm larval, pupal and adult weights were lower on elevated CO2 grown Bt cotton than on nontransgenic cotton.

Treatment
elevated CO 2 ‐grown transgenic Bt cottone0
Interactor
bollwormsHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
larval, pupal, and adult moth weightse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
non‐transgenic cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly reduced larval, pupal, and adult moth weights were observed in the bollworms fed elevated CO 2 ‐grown transgenic Bt cotton compared with those of bollworms reared on non‐transgenic cotton, regardless of the CO 2 level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton on plant chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton reduced bollworm conversion of ingested and digested food.

Treatment
transgenic Bt cottone0
Interactor
bollwormHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
efficiency of conversion of ingested food and of digested food of the bollworme0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficiency of conversion of ingested food and of digested food of the bollworm were significantly reduced when fed transgenic Bt cotton, but there was no significant CO 2 or CO 2 × cotton cultivar interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1684 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton on plant chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 and CO2 by cultivar interaction were not significant for food conversion efficiency.

Treatment
CO 2e0
Outcome
CO 2 × cotton cultivar interactione0
Direction
no significante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant CO 2 or CO 2 × cotton cultivar interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1684 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton on plant chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bollworm approximate digestibility was higher on Bt cotton at elevated CO2 than on nontransgenic cotton at ambient CO2.

Treatment
transgenic cotton grown in elevated CO 2e0
Interactor
larvaee0pest
Outcome
Approximate digestibilitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non‐transgenic cotton grown at ambient CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Approximate digestibility of larvae reared on transgenic cotton grown in elevated CO 2 was higher compared to that of larvae fed non‐transgenic cotton grown at ambient CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1686–1858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton on plant chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Authors predict more serious bollworm damage under elevated CO2 because nitrogen deficiency drives compensatory feeding.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Interactor
cotton bollwormHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
damage inflicted by cotton bollworme0
Direction
more seriouse0
Qualifier
individual compensatory feeding on host plants caused by nitrogen deficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The damage inflicted by cotton bollworm on cotton, regardless of the presence or absence of insecticidal genes, is predicted to be more serious under elevated CO 2 conditions because of individual compensatory feeding on host plants caused by nitrogen deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1861–2123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton on plant chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑

co2 · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 6 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

transgenic · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.