Paper · 2008 · HortTechnology

1-Methylcyclopropene Concentration and Timing of Postharvest Application Alters the Ripening of ‘McIntosh’ Apples during Storage

Jennifer R. DeEll; Jennifer T. Ayres; Dennis P. Murr

13
claims
19
verbatim quotes
43
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) concentration (1000 vs. 625 ppb) and treatment delays (3, 7, and 10 days after harvest) on the ripening and incidence of storage disorders in ‘McIntosh’ apples from three harvest times in 2004. Apples were stored in air at 0 °C to 1 °C for 3 and 6 months or in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage at 3 °C for 6 and 9 months. Apples treated with 1-MCP and held in air or CA storage were firmer than those not treated, but this difference in firmness was less with later harvests, more delay before 1-MCP treatment, and longer storage time. Apples treated with 1000 ppb 1-MCP were often firmer than those treated with 625 ppb after 6 months of storage and/or 7 days at 22 °C. Ethylene and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) production were reduced in apples treated with 1-MCP, especially in fruit from the first harvest and those treated 3 days after harvest. Fruit treated with 1000 ppb 1-MCP showed a slower increase in ethylene production than those treated with 625 ppb during 14 days at 22 °C after storage. CO 2 production was the lowest in ‘McIntosh’ apples treated with 1000 ppb 1-MCP 3 days after harvest, but fruit treated with 625 ppb also exhibited lower respiration than those not treated. Storage disorders were most prevalent in ‘McIntosh’ apples stored for 6 months in air at 0 °C to 1 °C, whereas fruit from the first harvest treated with 1-MCP 3 days after harvest developed the fewest disorders. 1-MCP reduced the incidence of superficial scald, flesh browning, core browning, and senescent breakdown, while 1-MCP concentration and treatment delay had varying effects. This research has provided the basis for Canadian registration of SmartFresh SM use on apples at 1000 ppb 1-MCP and for the requirement that treatment be within 3 days of harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP treated apples remained firmer than untreated apples in air or controlled atmosphere storage.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
firmere0
Direction
firmere0
Comparator
those not treatede0
Setting
air or CA storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apples treated with 1-MCP and held in air or CA storage were firmer than those not treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–479 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The firmness benefit of 1-MCP weakened with later harvest, longer treatment delay and longer storage.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmente0
Outcome
difference in firmnesse0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
later harvests, more delay before 1-MCP treatment, and longer storage timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this difference in firmness was less with later harvests, more delay before 1-MCP treatment, and longer storage time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1000 ppb 1-MCP often retained greater firmness than 625 ppb.

Treatment
1000 ppb 1-MCPe0
Outcome
firmere0
Direction
firmere0
Qualifier
after 6 months of storage and/or 7 days at 22 °Ce0
Comparator
625 ppbe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apples treated with 1000 ppb 1-MCP were often firmer than those treated with 625 ppb after 6 months of storage and/or 7 days at 22 °C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP reduced apple ethylene production.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
Ethylenee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethylene and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) production were reduced in apples treated with 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP reduced apple carbon dioxide production.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethylene and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) production were reduced in apples treated with 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1000 ppb 1-MCP slowed ethylene production increase compared with 625 ppb during 14 days at 22 °C.

Treatment
1000 ppb 1-MCPe0
Outcome
ethylene productione0
Direction
slower increasee0
Qualifier
during 14 days at 22 °C after storagee0
Comparator
625 ppbe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit treated with 1000 ppb 1-MCP showed a slower increase in ethylene production than those treated with 625 ppb during 14 days at 22 °C after storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 production was lowest with 1000 ppb 1-MCP applied three days after harvest.

Taxon
‘McIntosh’ applese0
Treatment
1000 ppb 1-MCP 3 days after harveste0
Outcome
CO 2 productione0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 production was the lowest in ‘McIntosh’ apples treated with 1000 ppb 1-MCP 3 days after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

625 ppb 1-MCP reduced respiration relative to untreated fruit.

Treatment
625 ppbe0
Outcome
respiratione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
those not treatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit treated with 625 ppb also exhibited lower respiration than those not treated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage disorders were most prevalent after six months of air storage at 0 to 1 °C.

Taxon
‘McIntosh’ applese0
Outcome
Storage disorderse0
Direction
most prevalente0
Qualifier
6 monthse0
Setting
air at 0 °C to 1 °Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“Storage disorders were most prevalent in ‘McIntosh’ apples stored for 6 months in air at 0 °C to 1 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-harvest fruit treated three days after harvest had the fewest storage disorders.

Treatment
1-MCP 3 days after harveste0
Outcome
disorderse0
Direction
feweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit from the first harvest treated with 1-MCP 3 days after harvest developed the fewest disorders.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1465 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP reduced superficial scald, flesh browning and core browning.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
incidence of superficial scald, flesh browning, core browninge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP reduced the incidence of superficial scald, flesh browning, core browning, and senescent breakdown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP reduced senescent breakdown.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
senescent breakdowne0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP reduced the incidence of superficial scald, flesh browning, core browning, and senescent breakdown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The study supported Canadian registration of 1000 ppb 1-MCP for apples and treatment within three days of harvest.

Treatment
1000 ppb 1-MCPe0
Outcome
requirement that treatment be within 3 days of harveste0
Setting
Canadiane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research has provided the basis for Canadian registration of SmartFresh SM use on apples at 1000 ppb 1-MCP and for the requirement that treatment be within 3 days of harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1818 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

49 papers: 33 positive, 16 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: respiration · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.