Paper · 1999 · Journal of Food Science

Photochemical Treatment to Improve Storability of Fresh Strawberries

M. Baka; J. Mercier; R. Corcuff; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
149
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT We investigated the effect of pre‐storage exposure to shortwave ultra‐violet (UV‐C) light on the decay and quality of fresh strawberries. Fresh strawberries (cv. Kent, 25% to 50% red) were exposed to UV‐C at doses of 0.25 and 1.0 kJ/m 2 and stored at 4 °C or 13 °C. UV treatment controlled the decay caused by Botrytis cinerea at both temperatures and extended the shelf‐life of the fruits by 4 to 5 d. UV‐treated fruits had a lower respiration rate, higher titratable acidity and anthocyanin content, and were firmer than the untreated fruits. The percentage of free sugars increased faster in UV‐treated fruits at the beginning of the storage period. A lower electrical conductivity in fruits treated with 0.25 kJ/m 2 suggests a slower rate of senescence compared to the control. A higher electrical conductivity observed with 1.0 kJ/m 2 suggests damage to the fruits. Overall, UV treatment at 0.25 kJ/m 2 appears to slow down the ripening and senescence of strawberry fruits stored at 4 °C.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C controlled Botrytis cinerea decay at both storage temperatures.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
UV treatmente0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
decay caused by Botrytis cinereae0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV treatment controlled the decay caused by Botrytis cinerea at both temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C extended fruit shelf life by 4 to 5 d.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
UV treatmente0
Outcome
shelf‐life of the fruitse0
Direction
extendede0
Value
4 to 5 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV treatment controlled the decay caused by Botrytis cinerea at both temperatures and extended the shelf‐life of the fruits by 4 to 5 d.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–411 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-treated fruit had lower respiration than untreated fruit.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
UV‐treatede0
Outcome
respiration ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
untreated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV‐treated fruits had a lower respiration rate, higher titratable acidity and anthocyanin content, and were firmer than the untreated fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-treated fruit had higher acidity and anthocyanin content.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
UV‐treatede0
Outcome
titratable acidity and anthocyanin contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV‐treated fruits had a lower respiration rate, higher titratable acidity and anthocyanin content, and were firmer than the untreated fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-treated fruit were firmer than untreated fruit.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
UV‐treatede0
Outcome
firmere0
Direction
firmere0
Comparator
untreated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV‐treated fruits had a lower respiration rate, higher titratable acidity and anthocyanin content, and were firmer than the untreated fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Free sugars rose faster in UV-treated fruit early in storage.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
UV‐treatede0
Outcome
percentage of free sugarse0
Direction
increased fastere0
Qualifier
beginning of the storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of free sugars increased faster in UV‐treated fruits at the beginning of the storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 0.25 kJ/m 2 dose lowered fruit electrical conductivity versus control.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
0.25 kJ/m 2e0
Outcome
electrical conductivitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lower electrical conductivity in fruits treated with 0.25 kJ/m 2 suggests a slower rate of senescence compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1.0 kJ/m 2 dose raised fruit electrical conductivity, suggesting damage.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
1.0 kJ/m 2e0
Outcome
electrical conductivitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
damage to the fruitse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher electrical conductivity observed with 1.0 kJ/m 2 suggests damage to the fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer 0.25 kJ/m 2 UV slows strawberry ripening and senescence at 4 °C.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
UV treatment at 0.25 kJ/m 2e0
Outcome
ripening and senescence of strawberry fruitse0
Setting
4 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV treatment at 0.25 kJ/m 2 appears to slow down the ripening and senescence of strawberry fruits stored at 4 °C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1002 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: respiration · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

uv · Botrytis cinerea · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

uv · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

uv · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.