Paper · 2004 · Journal of Bacteriology

luxR Homolog avhR in Agrobacterium vitis Affects the Development of a Grape-Specific Necrosis and a Tobacco Hypersensitive Response

Guixia Hao; Hongsheng Zhang; Desen Zheng; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
35
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The luxR homolog aviR in Agrobacterium vitis strain F2/5 was recently shown to be associated with induction of a hypersensitive response (HR) on tobacco and necrosis on grape plants, indicating that the responses are regulated by quorum sensing. We now report a second luxR homolog, avhR, whose disruption (mutant M1320) results in HR-negative and reduced grape necrosis phenotypes. The deduced AvhR protein has characteristic autoinducer binding and DNA binding domains and is unique among reported functional LuxR homologs in having substitutions at highly conserved Asp70, Trp57, and Trp85 residues, which are predicted to play important roles in autoinducer binding in TraR. M1320 was fully complemented with cloned avhR. The same array of N-acylhomoserine lactones (AHL) from F2/5, M1320, and complemented M1320 were observed; however, the signal strength from extracts of 6-day-old M1320 cultures was stronger than that of F2/5. Cultures of F2/5 amended with AHL extracts from overnight and 6-day cultures of F2/5 and M1320 were not affected in ability to cause HR or necrosis. A region of about 14 kb flanking avhR was sequenced and compared with homologous regions of A. tumefaciens C58 and Sinorhizobium meliloti Rm1021 genomes. Gene order and homology are conserved between the species. A site-directed mutation in a putative gene that resides downstream of avhR and that has homology to genes belonging to the ATP-binding cassette transporter family did not affect HR or necrosis phenotypes. It was determined that avhR and aviR are expressed independently and that neither regulates the expression of a clpA homolog in F2/5.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disrupting avhR eliminated the tobacco hypersensitive response.

Treatment
disruption (mutant M1320)e0
Gene
avhRt0
Outcome
HR-negativee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whose disruption (mutant M1320) results in HR-negative and reduced grape necrosis phenotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–382 · show in text ↑
t0

“avhR in Agrobacterium vitis Affects the Development of a Grape-Specific Necrosis and a Tobacco Hypersensitive Response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disrupting avhR reduced grape necrosis.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
disruption (mutant M1320)e0
Gene
avhRt0
Outcome
grape necrosise0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“whose disruption (mutant M1320) results in HR-negative and reduced grape necrosis phenotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–382 · show in text ↑
t0

“avhR in Agrobacterium vitis Affects the Development of a Grape-Specific Necrosis and a Tobacco Hypersensitive Response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cloned avhR fully complemented M1320.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
cloned avhRe0
Outcome
fully complementede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“M1320 was fully complemented with cloned avhR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AHL signal strength was stronger in six-day M1320 cultures than F2/5.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
signal strengthe0
Direction
strongere0
Comparator
F2/5e0

Verbatim

e0

“the signal strength from extracts of 6-day-old M1320 cultures was stronger than that of F2/5.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AHL extract amendments did not affect HR or necrosis.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
amended with AHL extractse0
Outcome
ability to cause HR or necrosise0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cultures of F2/5 amended with AHL extracts from overnight and 6-day cultures of F2/5 and M1320 were not affected in ability to cause HR or necrosis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A downstream transporter-like gene mutation did not affect HR or necrosis.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
site-directed mutatione0
Outcome
HR or necrosis phenotypese0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A site-directed mutation in a putative gene that resides downstream of avhR and that has homology to genes belonging to the ATP-binding cassette transporter family did not affect HR or necrosis phenotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑

climate site · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

loss of function · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

botanical · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.