Paper · 2009 · Food Science and Technology International

Control of Table Grapes Postharvest Decay by Ozone Treatment and Resveratrol Induction

J.A. Cayuela; A. Vázquez; A.G. Pérez; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
64
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Continued and intermittent (12 h per day) ozone treatments (2 ppm) to control postharvest decay have been assayed during the storage of ‘Superior Seedless’, ‘Cardinal CL80,’ and ‘Regina Victoria’ table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) at 5 °C for 72 days. The effects of these treatments on the main fruit quality parameters, including resveratrol content, were monitored. Both ozone treatments considerably reduced decay of cold stored grapes compared to those kept in air, continuous ozone treatment being the most effective for controlling postharvest losses. Intermittent ozone treatment induced the highest resveratrol content in stored grapes. On the contrary, ozone-treated grapes got lower scores in the sensory evaluation tests and also showed significantly higher weight losses than the fruits kept in air.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both ozone schedules reduced grape decay compared with air.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
ozone treatmentse0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
those kept in aire0

Verbatim

e0

“Both ozone treatments considerably reduced decay of cold stored grapes compared to those kept in air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous ozone was most effective for postharvest losses.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
continuous ozone treatmente0
Outcome
postharvest lossese0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“continuous ozone treatment being the most effective for controlling postharvest losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent ozone induced highest grape resveratrol content.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Intermittent ozone treatmente0
Outcome
resveratrol contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Intermittent ozone treatment induced the highest resveratrol content in stored grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone-treated grapes received lower sensory scores.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
ozone-treatede0
Outcome
scores in the sensory evaluation testse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“ozone-treated grapes got lower scores in the sensory evaluation tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone-treated grapes had significantly higher weight loss than fruit kept in air.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
ozone-treatede0
Outcome
weight lossese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the fruits kept in aire0

Verbatim

e0

“ozone-treated grapes got lower scores in the sensory evaluation tests and also showed significantly higher weight losses than the fruits kept in air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–809 · show in text ↑

ozone · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

ozone · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

ozone · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.