Paper · 2003 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Quality and Enhancement of Bioactive Phenolics in Cv. Napoleon Table Grapes Exposed to Different Postharvest Gaseous Treatments

Francisco Artés-Hernández; Francisco Artés; Francisco A. Tomás-Barberán

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
85
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ten different gaseous treatments were evaluated for their efficacy in the keeping quality of cv. Napoleon table grapes during 38 days of storage at 0 degrees C followed by 6 days of shelf life at 15 degrees C in air. These storage methods included modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) with and without SO(2) or natural fungicides (hexanal and hexenal), two controlled atmospheres (CA), and intermittent and continuous applications of O(3). As a control, air atmosphere during cold storage was used. Most of the treatments applied kept the postharvest quality of the grapes, although the best results were obtained by the use of a MAP with 5 kPa of O(2) plus 15 kPa of CO(2) plus 80 kPa of N(2). The total anthocyanin content at harvest was 170 +/- 19 microg/g of fresh weight (fw) of grapes, which declined in most of the treatments applied and was reflected in the loss of red color. Peonidin 3-glucoside was detected at all sampling times as the major anthocyanin (always >50% from the total content). Treatments applied kept or decreased the total flavonol content from that measured at harvest (17 +/- 1.4 microg/g of fw of berries). However, an increase of up to 2-fold in total stilbenoid content after shelf life for CA and O(3) treatments was observed. At all sampling times for almost every treatment piceid concentration remained unaltered or slightly changed, whereas large increases were observed after shelf life for resveratrol (1.2 +/- 0.6 microg/g of fw of grapes sampled at harvest), even up to 3- and 4-fold for O(3)-treated grapes and 2-fold for CA-treated ones. Therefore, improved techniques for the keeping quality of cv. Napoleon table grapes during long-term storage seem to maintain or enhance their antioxidant compound content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most gas treatments kept postharvest grape quality.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
postharvest qualitye0

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the treatments applied kept the postharvest quality of the grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MAP with 5 kPa O2, 15 kPa CO2 and 80 kPa N2 gave the best quality results.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
MAP with 5 kPa of O(2) plus 15 kPa of CO(2) plus 80 kPa of N(2)e0
Outcome
best resultse0
Direction
beste0

Verbatim

e0

“the best results were obtained by the use of a MAP with 5 kPa of O(2) plus 15 kPa of CO(2) plus 80 kPa of N(2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest total anthocyanin content was 170 +/- 19 microg/g fresh weight.

Taxon
grapese0
Organ / stage
harveste0
Outcome
total anthocyanin contente0
Value
170 +/- 19 microg/g of fresh weight (fw)e0

Verbatim

e0

“The total anthocyanin content at harvest was 170 +/- 19 microg/g of fresh weight (fw) of grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–789 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total anthocyanin declined under most treatments, with loss of red color.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
total anthocyanin contente1
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
most of the treatments appliede0

Verbatim

e0

“which declined in most of the treatments applied and was reflected in the loss of red color.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“The total anthocyanin content at harvest was 170 +/- 19 microg/g of fresh weight (fw) of grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–789 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peonidin 3-glucoside was the major anthocyanin at all times, over half the total.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
major anthocyanine0
Value
>50%e0
Qualifier
all sampling timese0

Verbatim

e0

“Peonidin 3-glucoside was detected at all sampling times as the major anthocyanin (always >50% from the total content).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavonol content stayed at or fell below the harvest level of 17 +/- 1.4 microg/g.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
total flavonol contente0
Direction
kept or decreasede0
Value
17 +/- 1.4 microg/g of fwe0
Comparator
harveste0

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments applied kept or decreased the total flavonol content from that measured at harvest (17 +/- 1.4 microg/g of fw of berries).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CA treatment increased total stilbenoids up to twofold after shelf life.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
CAe0
Outcome
total stilbenoid contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2-folde0
Qualifier
after shelf lifee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“an increase of up to 2-fold in total stilbenoid content after shelf life for CA and O(3) treatments was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O3 treatment increased total stilbenoids up to twofold after shelf life.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
O(3)e0
Outcome
total stilbenoid contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2-folde0
Qualifier
after shelf lifee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“an increase of up to 2-fold in total stilbenoid content after shelf life for CA and O(3) treatments was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Piceid concentration was unaltered or slightly changed at nearly all times and treatments.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
piceid concentratione0
Direction
remained unaltered or slightly changede0
Qualifier
almost every treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“At all sampling times for almost every treatment piceid concentration remained unaltered or slightly changed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest resveratrol was 1.2 +/- 0.6 microg/g fresh weight.

Taxon
grapese0
Organ / stage
harveste0
Outcome
resveratrole0
Value
1.2 +/- 0.6 microg/g of fwe0

Verbatim

e0

“resveratrol (1.2 +/- 0.6 microg/g of fw of grapes sampled at harvest)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O3 treatment increased resveratrol three- to fourfold after shelf life.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
O(3)-treatede0
Outcome
resveratrole0
Direction
increasese0
Value
3- and 4-folde0
Qualifier
after shelf lifee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“large increases were observed after shelf life for resveratrol (1.2 +/- 0.6 microg/g of fw of grapes sampled at harvest), even up to 3- and 4-fold for O(3)-treated grapes and 2-fold for CA-treated ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CA treatment increased resveratrol twofold after shelf life.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
CA-treatede0
Outcome
resveratrole0
Direction
increasese0
Value
2-folde0
Qualifier
after shelf lifee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“large increases were observed after shelf life for resveratrol (1.2 +/- 0.6 microg/g of fw of grapes sampled at harvest), even up to 3- and 4-fold for O(3)-treated grapes and 2-fold for CA-treated ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1580 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Improved storage techniques seem to maintain or enhance antioxidant compound content.

Taxon
table grapese0
Material
cv. Napoleone0
Outcome
maintain or enhance their antioxidant compound contente0

Verbatim

e0

“improved techniques for the keeping quality of cv. Napoleon table grapes during long-term storage seem to maintain or enhance their antioxidant compound content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1753 · show in text ↑

ozone · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.