Paper · 2013 · Agronomy

Bacillus simplex—A Little Known PGPB with Anti-Fungal Activity—Alters Pea Legume Root Architecture and Nodule Morphology When Coinoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae

Allison Schwartz; Irma Ortiz; Maskit Maymon; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
109
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two strains, 30N-5 and 30VD-1, identified as Bacillus simplex and B. subtilis, were isolated from the rhizospheres of two different plants, a Podocarpus and a palm, respectively, growing in the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Mildred E. Mathias Botanical Garden. B. subtilis is a well-known plant-growth promoting bacterial species, but B. simplex is not. B. simplex 30N-5 was initially isolated on a nitrogen-free medium, but no evidence for nitrogen fixation was found. Nevertheless, pea plants inoculated with B. simplex showed a change in root architecture due to the emergence of more lateral roots. When Pisum sativum carrying a DR5::GUSA construct, an indicator for auxin response, was inoculated with either B. simplex 30N-5 or its symbiont Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae 128C53, GUS expression in the roots was increased over the uninoculated controls. Moreover, when pea roots were coinoculated with either B. simplex 30N-5 or B. subtilis 30VD-1 and R. leguminosarum bv. viciae 128C53, the nodules were larger, clustered, and developed more highly branched vascular bundles. Besides producing siderophores and solubilizing phosphate, the two Bacillus spp., especially strain 30VD-1, exhibited anti-fungal activity towards Fusarium. Our data show that combining nodulating, nitrogen-fixing rhizobia with growth-promoting bacteria enhances plant development and strongly supports a coinoculation strategy to improve nitrogen fixation, increase biomass, and establish greater resistance to fungal disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. simplex 30N-5 lacked evidence of nitrogen fixation.

Interactor
B. simplex 30N-5Peribacillus simplexe0symbiont
Outcome
no evidence for nitrogen fixatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Peribacillus simplex
Peribacillus simplex · InteractorBevan Weir ( bevan ) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. simplex 30N-5 was initially isolated on a nitrogen-free medium, but no evidence for nitrogen fixation was found.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea Legume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. simplex inoculation induced more lateral roots in pea.

Treatment
inoculated with B. simplexe0
Interactor
B. simplexPeribacillus simplexe0symbiont
Outcome
lateral rootse0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Peribacillus simplex
Peribacillus simplex · InteractorBevan Weir ( bevan ) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pea plants inoculated with B. simplex showed a change in root architecture due to the emergence of more lateral roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. simplex 30N-5 increased root GUS expression.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
Material
DR5::GUSAe0
Treatment
inoculated with either B. simplex 30N-5e0
Interactor
B. simplex 30N-5Peribacillus simplexe0symbiont
Outcome
GUS expression in the rootse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Peribacillus simplex
Peribacillus simplex · InteractorBevan Weir ( bevan ) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When Pisum sativum carrying a DR5::GUSA construct, an indicator for auxin response, was inoculated with either B. simplex 30N-5 or its symbiont Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae 128C53, GUS expression in the roots was increased over the uninoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation increased root GUS expression.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae 128C53e0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae 128C53Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae 128C53e0symbiont
Outcome
GUS expression in the rootse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When Pisum sativum carrying a DR5::GUSA construct, an indicator for auxin response, was inoculated with either B. simplex 30N-5 or its symbiont Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae 128C53, GUS expression in the roots was increased over the uninoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. simplex plus rhizobia produced larger, clustered nodules with more branched vascular bundles.

Treatment
B. simplex 30N-5e0
Interactor
R. leguminosarum bv. viciae 128C53Rhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
Second interactor
B. simplex 30N-5Peribacillus simplexe0symbiont
Outcome
nodules were larger, clustered, and developed more highly branched vascular bundlese0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Peribacillus simplex
Peribacillus simplex · Second interactorBevan Weir ( bevan ) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when pea roots were coinoculated with either B. simplex 30N-5 or B. subtilis 30VD-1 and R. leguminosarum bv. viciae 128C53, the nodules were larger, clustered, and developed more highly branched vascular bundles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis plus rhizobia produced larger, clustered nodules with more branched vascular bundles.

Treatment
B. subtilis 30VD-1e0
Interactor
R. leguminosarum bv. viciae 128C53Rhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
Second interactor
B. subtilis 30VD-1Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
nodules were larger, clustered, and developed more highly branched vascular bundlese0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when pea roots were coinoculated with either B. simplex 30N-5 or B. subtilis 30VD-1 and R. leguminosarum bv. viciae 128C53, the nodules were larger, clustered, and developed more highly branched vascular bundles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both Bacillus strains produced siderophores and solubilized phosphate.

Interactor
Bacillus spp.e0symbiont
Outcome
producing siderophores and solubilizing phosphatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Besides producing siderophores and solubilizing phosphate, the two Bacillus spp., especially strain 30VD-1, exhibited anti-fungal activity towards Fusarium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea Legume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both Bacillus strains, especially 30VD-1, had antifungal activity against Fusarium.

Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus spp.e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
anti-fungal activity towards Fusariume0
Qualifier
especially strain 30VD-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the two Bacillus spp., especially strain 30VD-1, exhibited anti-fungal activity towards Fusarium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea Legume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–80 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support coinoculation to improve nitrogen fixation, biomass and fungal resistance.

Outcome
coinoculation strategy to improve nitrogen fixation, increase biomass, and establish greater resistance to fungal diseasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strongly supports a coinoculation strategy to improve nitrogen fixation, increase biomass, and establish greater resistance to fungal disease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea Legume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–80 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium leguminosarum · molecular: expression · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · molecular: expression · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 72 positive, 17 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.