Paper · 2002 · Weed Technology

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and Weed Response to Flumioxazin Applied Preplant and Postemergence Directed1

SHAWN D. ASKEW; JOHN W. WILCUT; JOHN R. CRANMER

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Separate field experiments were conducted to evaluate weed control and cotton response to flumioxazin in North Carolina. Flumioxazin postemergence directed (PD) at 70 g ai/ha applied alone or mixed with glyphosate or MSMA completely controlled common lambsquarters, common ragweed, entireleaf morningglory, ivyleaf morningglory, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, and tall morningglory 4 wk after treatment. Glyphosate at 1,120 g ai/ha controlled sicklepod and entireleaf, ivyleaf, pitted, and tall morningglory less than flumioxazin. Weed-free experiments were conducted to evaluate cotton injury, fresh biomass reduction, and yield response to flumioxazin at 70 g ai/ha preplant (PP) and two rates PD. Nine PP applications were made at various timings between 0 and 10 wk prior to planting. Cotton was stunted 12% initially, and midseason cotton biomass was reduced when flumioxazin was applied at planting in 1 yr. Flumioxazin did not injure 15- or 30-cm–tall cotton when applied PD at 36 or 70 g/ha. Cotton yield differed between years, but was not affected by various flumioxazin treatments compared with commercial standards and nontreated controls.Nomenclature: Flumioxazin; glyphosate; MSMA; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEAL; common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. # AMBEL; entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray # IPOHG; ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHE; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S.Wats. # AMAPA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLA; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSP; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia Irwin and Banaby # CASOB; smooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. # AMACH; tall morningglory, Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth # PHBPU; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Deltapine 51’, ‘Suregrow 125’.Additional index words: Burn-down application, fresh biomass, injury, LAYBY, stale seedbed.Abbreviations: LAYBY, the last postemergence-directed herbicide application; PD, postemergence directed; POST, postemergence; PP, preplant; PRE, preemergence; WAP, weeks after planting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Directed flumioxazin alone or in mixtures completely controlled the listed weeds after four weeks.

Taxon
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0
Treatment
Flumioxazin postemergence directed (PD) at 70 g ai/hae0
Outcome
controlled common lambsquarters, common ragweed, entireleaf morningglory, ivyleaf morningglory, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, and tall morningglorye0
Direction
completely controllede0
Qualifier
4 wk after treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flumioxazin postemergence directed (PD) at 70 g ai/ha applied alone or mixed with glyphosate or MSMA completely controlled common lambsquarters, common ragweed, entireleaf morningglory, ivyleaf morningglory, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, and tall morningglory 4 wk after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate controlled sicklepod and five morningglories less than flumioxazin.

Taxon
sicklepode0
Treatment
Glyphosate at 1,120 g ai/hae0
Outcome
controlled sicklepod and entireleaf, ivyleaf, pitted, and tall morningglorye0
Direction
less thane0
Comparator
flumioxazine0

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate at 1,120 g ai/ha controlled sicklepod and entireleaf, ivyleaf, pitted, and tall morningglory less than flumioxazin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant flumioxazin at planting initially stunted cotton by 12%.

Treatment
flumioxazin was applied at plantinge0
Outcome
Cotton was stuntede0
Direction
stuntede0
Value
12%e0
Qualifier
in 1 yre0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton was stunted 12% initially, and midseason cotton biomass was reduced when flumioxazin was applied at planting in 1 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–961 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flumioxazin at planting reduced midseason cotton biomass in one year.

Treatment
flumioxazin was applied at plantinge0
Outcome
midseason cotton biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in 1 yre0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“midseason cotton biomass was reduced when flumioxazin was applied at planting in 1 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–961 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Directed flumioxazin did not injure 15- or 30-cm-tall cotton at either tested rate.

Treatment
Flumioxazine0
Outcome
injuree0
Direction
did not injuree0
Qualifier
15- or 30-cm–talle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flumioxazin did not injure 15- or 30-cm–tall cotton when applied PD at 36 or 70 g/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1047 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield differed between years.

Outcome
Cotton yielde0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield differed between years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flumioxazin treatments did not affect cotton yield relative to standards or untreated controls.

Treatment
various flumioxazin treatmentse0
Outcome
Cotton yielde0
Direction
was not affectede0
Comparator
commercial standards and nontreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield differed between years, but was not affected by various flumioxazin treatments compared with commercial standards and nontreated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1199 · show in text ↑

flumioxazin · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

flumioxazin · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

flumioxazin · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · control · Chenopodium album (common lambsquarters)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.