Paper · 1979 · Physiologia Plantarum

The Effect of Reduced Light Intensity and Sub‐optimal Potassium Supply on N2 Fixation and N Turnover in Rhizobium Infected Lucerne

SALA FEIGENBAUM; KONRAD MENGEL

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effect of low light intensity and suboptimal potassium supply on the fixation of molecular nitrogen by root nodules and the nitrogen turnover in the host plant was studied in Medicago sativa using 15 N labelled molecular nitrogen. For the application of 15 N 2 labelled gas a special box was used. Both low light intensity and a low potassium supply resulted in a substantial growth depression. In particular the protein content of tops, roots and nodules was lower in the plants of the low light intensity treatment as compared with the control plants. Decreasing potassium supply had a similar but less‐pronounced effect on protein content. The low protein content was not a consequence of a lack of soluble amino nitrogen or NH 3 , since these fractions were influenced to a lesser degree by the reduced light intensity and by the low potassium supply. This observation is supported by the data obtained with 15 N. N 2 fixation and NH 3 assimilation were affected by both low light intensity and low K application to the same degree as the overall metabolism, thus showing no particular response to the treatments applied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light substantially depressed lucerne growth.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
low light intensitye0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
depressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both low light intensity and a low potassium supply resulted in a substantial growth depression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–407 · show in text ↑
e1

“studied in Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low potassium substantially depressed lucerne growth.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
low potassium supplye0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
depressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both low light intensity and a low potassium supply resulted in a substantial growth depression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–407 · show in text ↑
e1

“studied in Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light reduced protein content in lucerne tops, roots and nodules.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Organ / stage
tops, roots and nodulese0
Treatment
low light intensity treatmente0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the protein content of tops, roots and nodules was lower in the plants of the low light intensity treatment as compared with the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–565 · show in text ↑
e1

“studied in Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced potassium similarly but less strongly lowered protein content.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae2
Treatment
Decreasing potassium supplye0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing potassium supply had a similar but less‐pronounced effect on protein content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–655 · show in text ↑
e1

“protein content of tops, roots and nodules was lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–478 · show in text ↑
e2

“studied in Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble amino nitrogen and NH3 fractions changed less than protein under reduced light and potassium.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae2
Treatment
reduced light intensitye0
Outcome
soluble amino nitrogen or NH 3e1
Direction
lesser degreee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these fractions were influenced to a lesser degree by the reduced light intensity and by the low potassium supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–867 · show in text ↑
e1

“soluble amino nitrogen or NH 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–745 · show in text ↑
e2

“studied in Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fixation and ammonia assimilation tracked overall metabolism under low light and low potassium without a distinct response.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
low light intensity and low K applicatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt0symbiont
Outcome
N 2 fixation and NH 3 assimilatione0
Direction
no particular responsee0
Comparator
overall metabolisme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N 2 fixation and NH 3 assimilation were affected by both low light intensity and low K application to the same degree as the overall metabolism, thus showing no particular response to the treatments applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1138 · show in text ↑
e1

“studied in Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–203 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizobium Infected Lucerne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 · show in text ↑

light · molecular: metabolites · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

light · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

potassium · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

light · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 18 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

light · Rhizobium · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

potassium · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.