Abstract
ABSTRACT Field experiments were carried out at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India. The principal findings revealed that application of 3t vermicompost/ha to chickpea improved dry matter accumulation, grain yield and grain protein content in chickpea, soil N and P and bacterial count, dry fodder yield of succeeding maize, total N and P uptake by the cropping system over no vermicompost. Seed inoculation of chickpea with Rhizobium + PSB (phosphate solubilizing bacteria) increased dry matter accumulation, grain yield and protein content of chickpea, dry fodder yield of succeeding maize and total N and P uptake by the cropping system over no inoculation and inoculation with Rhizobium alone. Rhizobium with and without PSB also increased soil N content over no inoculation. However, soil P content and bacterial count remained unaffected by Rhizobium alone but improved with Rhizobium + PSB over no inoculation. Application of phosphorus up to 26 kg P/ha to chickpea improved dry matter accumulation, grain yield and protein content of chickpea, dry fodder yield of succeeding maize and total N and P uptake by cropping system. Application of 13 and 26 kg P/ha increased soil N and P content over no phosphorus.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 3 t vermicompost/ha to chickpea improved dry matter accumulation, grain yield and grain protein content of chickpea over no vermicompost.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- application of 3t vermicompost/hae0
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulation, grain yield and grain protein content in chickpeae1
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- no vermicomposte2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 3t vermicompost/ha to chickpea improved”
e1“dry matter accumulation, grain yield and grain protein content in chickpea”
e2“no vermicompost”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 3 t vermicompost/ha to chickpea improved soil N and P and bacterial count over no vermicompost.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- application of 3t vermicompost/hae0
- Outcome
- soil N and P and bacterial counte1
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- no vermicomposte2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 3t vermicompost/ha to chickpea improved”
e1“soil N and P and bacterial count”
e2“no vermicompost”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 3 t vermicompost/ha to chickpea improved dry fodder yield of the succeeding maize over no vermicompost.
- Treatment
- application of 3t vermicompost/hae0
- Outcome
- dry fodder yield of succeeding maizee1
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- no vermicomposte1
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 3t vermicompost/ha to chickpea improved”
e1“dry fodder yield of succeeding maize, total N and P uptake by the cropping system over no vermicompost”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 3 t vermicompost/ha to chickpea improved total N and P uptake by the chickpea-maize cropping system over no vermicompost.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- application of 3t vermicompost/hae0
- Outcome
- total N and P uptake by the cropping systeme1
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- no vermicomposte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 3t vermicompost/ha to chickpea improved”
e1“dry fodder yield of succeeding maize, total N and P uptake by the cropping system over no vermicompost”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed inoculation of chickpea with Rhizobium + PSB increased dry matter accumulation, grain yield and protein content of chickpea over no inoculation and Rhizobium alone.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- Seed inoculation of chickpea with Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0other
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulation, grain yield and protein content of chickpeae0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- no inoculation and inoculation with Rhizobium alonee1
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed inoculation of chickpea with Rhizobium + PSB (phosphate solubilizing bacteria) increased dry matter accumulation, grain yield and protein content of chickpea”
e1“no inoculation and inoculation with Rhizobium alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed inoculation of chickpea with Rhizobium + PSB increased dry fodder yield of the succeeding maize over no inoculation and Rhizobium alone.
- Treatment
- Seed inoculation of chickpea with Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0other
- Outcome
- dry fodder yield of succeeding maizee1
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- no inoculation and inoculation with Rhizobium alonee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed inoculation of chickpea with Rhizobium + PSB (phosphate solubilizing bacteria) increased”
e1“dry fodder yield of succeeding maize and total N and P uptake by the cropping system over no inoculation and inoculation with Rhizobium alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed inoculation of chickpea with Rhizobium + PSB increased total N and P uptake by the cropping system over no inoculation and Rhizobium alone.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- Seed inoculation of chickpea with Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0other
- Outcome
- total N and P uptake by the cropping systeme1
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- no inoculation and inoculation with Rhizobium alonee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed inoculation of chickpea with Rhizobium + PSB (phosphate solubilizing bacteria) increased”
e1“dry fodder yield of succeeding maize and total N and P uptake by the cropping system over no inoculation and inoculation with Rhizobium alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium with and without PSB increased soil N content over no inoculation.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium with and without PSBe0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0other
- Outcome
- soil N contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- no inoculatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rhizobium with and without PSB also increased soil N content over no inoculation”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil P content and bacterial count remained unaffected by Rhizobium alone relative to no inoculation.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium alonee0
- Outcome
- soil P content and bacterial counte0
- Direction
- unaffectede0
- Comparator
- no inoculatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soil P content and bacterial count remained unaffected by Rhizobium alone but improved with Rhizobium + PSB over no inoculation”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil P content and bacterial count improved with Rhizobium + PSB over no inoculation.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0other
- Outcome
- soil P content and bacterial counte0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- no inoculatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soil P content and bacterial count remained unaffected by Rhizobium alone but improved with Rhizobium + PSB over no inoculation”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of phosphorus up to 26 kg P/ha to chickpea improved dry matter accumulation, grain yield and protein content of chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- Application of phosphorus up to 26 kg P/hae0
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulation, grain yield and protein content of chickpeae0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of phosphorus up to 26 kg P/ha to chickpea improved dry matter accumulation, grain yield and protein content of chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of phosphorus up to 26 kg P/ha to chickpea improved dry fodder yield of the succeeding maize.
- Treatment
- Application of phosphorus up to 26 kg P/hae0
- Outcome
- dry fodder yield of succeeding maizee1
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of phosphorus up to 26 kg P/ha to chickpea improved”
e1“dry fodder yield of succeeding maize and total N and P uptake by cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of phosphorus up to 26 kg P/ha to chickpea improved total N and P uptake by the cropping system.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- Application of phosphorus up to 26 kg P/hae0
- Outcome
- total N and P uptake by cropping systeme1
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of phosphorus up to 26 kg P/ha to chickpea improved”
e1“dry fodder yield of succeeding maize and total N and P uptake by cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 13 and 26 kg P/ha increased soil N and P content over no phosphorus.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Application of 13 and 26 kg P/hae0
- Outcome
- soil N and P contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- no phosphoruse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 13 and 26 kg P/ha increased soil N and P content over no phosphorus”
t0“Chickpea”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Cicer arietinum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Rhizobium · soil: biology · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Rhizobium · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →inoculation · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →fertilization · soil: biology · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →phosphorus · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.