Paper · 1989 · Experimental Agriculture

Dry Matter, Nodulation and Nutrient Uptake in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) as Influenced by Irrigation and Phosphorus

S. S. Parihar; R. S. Tripathi

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The response of chickpea to irrigation and phosphorus was studied at Kharagpur in Eastern India. Irrigation scheduling was based on the ratio between irrigation water applied and cumulative pan evaporation (ID/CPE), and had little effect on dry matter accumulation. Increasing the frequency and amount of irrigation reduced the number and dry weight of nodules per plant, which increased to a maximum 70 days after sowing and then declined. Irrigation significantly reduced grain yield as a result of excessive vegetative growth at the expense of pod formation. Application of phosphorus promoted nodulation and increased both nodule dry weight and the concentration of N, P and K in grain and stover. Uptake of N, P and K by the crop was also increased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation frequency and amount reduced the number and dry weight of nodules per chickpea plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
nodulese2
Treatment
Increasing the frequency and amount of irrigatione2
Outcome
number and dry weight of nodules per plante2
Direction
reducede2
Setting
Kharagpur in Eastern Indiae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of chickpea to irrigation and phosphorus was studied at Kharagpur in Eastern India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increasing the frequency and amount of irrigation reduced the number and dry weight of nodules per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–378 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea nodule number and dry weight per plant increased to a maximum at 70 days after sowing and then declined.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
nodulese1
Outcome
number and dry weight of nodules per plante1
Qualifier
increased to a maximum 70 days after sowing and then declinede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of chickpea to irrigation and phosphorus was studied at Kharagpur in Eastern India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“number and dry weight of nodules per plant, which increased to a maximum 70 days after sowing and then declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly reduced chickpea grain yield through excessive vegetative growth at the expense of pod formation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Irrigatione3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
reducede3
Qualifier
as a result of excessive vegetative growth at the expense of pod formatione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of chickpea to irrigation and phosphorus was studied at Kharagpur in Eastern India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–103 · show in text ↑
e3

“Irrigation significantly reduced grain yield as a result of excessive vegetative growth at the expense of pod formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application promoted chickpea nodulation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Application of phosphoruse4
Outcome
nodulatione4
Direction
promotede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of chickpea to irrigation and phosphorus was studied at Kharagpur in Eastern India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–103 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of phosphorus promoted nodulation and increased both nodule dry weight and the concentration of N, P and K in grain and stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application increased chickpea nodule dry weight.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
nodulee4
Treatment
Application of phosphoruse4
Outcome
nodule dry weighte4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of chickpea to irrigation and phosphorus was studied at Kharagpur in Eastern India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–103 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of phosphorus promoted nodulation and increased both nodule dry weight and the concentration of N, P and K in grain and stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application increased the concentration of N, P and K in chickpea grain and stover.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
grain and stovere4
Treatment
Application of phosphoruse4
Outcome
concentration of N, P and Ke4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of chickpea to irrigation and phosphorus was studied at Kharagpur in Eastern India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–103 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of phosphorus promoted nodulation and increased both nodule dry weight and the concentration of N, P and K in grain and stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application increased uptake of N, P and K by the chickpea crop.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Application of phosphoruse4
Outcome
Uptake of N, P and Ke5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of chickpea to irrigation and phosphorus was studied at Kharagpur in Eastern India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–103 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of phosphorus promoted nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–615 · show in text ↑
e5

“Uptake of N, P and K by the crop was also increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation scheduling based on the ratio of irrigation water to cumulative pan evaporation had little effect on chickpea dry matter accumulation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
ratio between irrigation water applied and cumulative pan evaporation (ID/CPE)e1
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of chickpea to irrigation and phosphorus was studied at Kharagpur in Eastern India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“ratio between irrigation water applied and cumulative pan evaporation (ID/CPE), and had little effect on dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–272 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

51 papers: 50 positive, 1 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

irrigation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 37 positive, 1 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 113 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.