Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the College Farm, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari (Gujarat) during the rabi and summer seasons of 2018 and 2019to study the residual effect of integrated nutrient management treatments imposed in preceding chickpea on succeeding fodder maize crop. The treatments in rabi chickpea consisted of viz., T1 - 100% RDF (20 N + 40 P2O5 + 00 K2O kg/ha), T2 - 75% RDF, T3 - 100% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB, T4 - 75% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB, T5- control. These treatments were replicated four times in randomized block design.Insucceding summer season, each main plotwas splitted into four sub-plots for fodder maize with treatments consisting of varying fertility levels viz., S1 - 100% RDF (80 N + 40 P2O5 + 00 K2O kg/ha), S2 - 75% RDF, S3 - 50% RDF and S4 - control to fodder maize resulting in twenty treatment combinations replicated four times in split plot design. Treatments 100% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB (T3), 100 % RDF(T1) and 75% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB(T4) showed significantly improvement in growth and yield attributes, yields and available nutrient status in soilin fodder maize. Among the four fertility levels directly applied in fodder maize, application of 100% RDF (S1) significantly highest all growth and yield attributes, available nutrient status in soil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Residual 100% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB improved maize growth and yield attributes, yield and soil nutrients.
- Taxon
- fodder maizee0
- Treatment
- 100% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB (T3)e0
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributes, yields and available nutrient status in soile0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Treatments 100% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB (T3), 100 % RDF(T1) and 75% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB(T4) showed significantly improvement in growth and yield attributes, yields and available nutrient status in soilin fodder maize.”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual 100% RDF improved maize growth and yield attributes, yield and soil nutrients.
- Taxon
- fodder maizee0
- Treatment
- 100 % RDF(T1)e0
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributes, yields and available nutrient status in soile0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Treatments 100% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB (T3), 100 % RDF(T1) and 75% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB(T4) showed significantly improvement in growth and yield attributes, yields and available nutrient status in soilin fodder maize.”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual 75% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB improved maize growth and yield attributes, yield and soil nutrients.
- Taxon
- fodder maizee0
- Treatment
- 75% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB(T4)e0
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributes, yields and available nutrient status in soile0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Treatments 100% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB (T3), 100 % RDF(T1) and 75% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB(T4) showed significantly improvement in growth and yield attributes, yields and available nutrient status in soilin fodder maize.”
Claim · model-written summary
Direct 100% RDF produced the highest maize growth and yield attributes and soil nutrient availability.
- Taxon
- fodder maizet0
- Treatment
- 100% RDF (S1)e0
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributes, available nutrient status in soile0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“application of 100% RDF (S1) significantly highest all growth and yield attributes, available nutrient status in soil.”
t0“Fodder Maize”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.