Paper · 2014 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Is it necessary to split nitrogen fertilization for winter wheat? On-farm research on Luvisols in South-West Germany

R. SCHULZ; T. MAKARY; S. HUBERT; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
55
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

SUMMARY Mineral nitrogen (N) fertilization in cereals is commonly split into three or four applications. In order to simplify N fertilization, a single N application either broadcast or placed on the soil surface was compared to conventionally split fertilization for winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). The 4-year experiment (2007–2010) was performed using a participatory approach on farmers’ fields on deep loamy soils (Luvisols) in South-West Germany. Grain yield and crude protein contents differed only slightly or not at all between treatments including different N fertilizer types (calcium ammonium nitrate, urea ammonium nitrate solution, urea) and application techniques (broadcast, placed). Furthermore, no differences were found for the yield components ears/m 2 and thousand grain weight. Inorganic N in the soil profile after harvest was generally below 40 kg N/ha and did not differ between treatments. In the area where N was placed, mineral N was depleted during the vegetation period. At the experimental sites a single N application in the period between tillering and stem elongation was sufficient to achieve high yield and quality of winter wheat without increased risk of nitrate leaching. This finding was independent of the method of application or the type of fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield and crude protein content of winter wheat differed only slightly or not at all between single and split N application.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
single N applicatione0
Outcome
Grain yield and crude protein contentse1
Direction
differed only slightly or not at alle1
Comparator
conventionally split fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single N application either broadcast or placed on the soil surface was compared to conventionally split fertilization for winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–304 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield and crude protein contents differed only slightly or not at all between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ears per square metre and thousand grain weight of winter wheat showed no differences between single and split N application.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
single N applicatione0
Outcome
ears/m 2 and thousand grain weighte2
Direction
no differences were founde2
Comparator
conventionally split fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single N application either broadcast or placed on the soil surface was compared to conventionally split fertilization for winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–304 · show in text ↑
e2

“no differences were found for the yield components ears/m 2 and thousand grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic N in the soil profile after harvest was generally below 40 kg N/ha and did not differ between single and split N application.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
single N applicatione0
Outcome
Inorganic N in the soil profile after harveste3
Direction
did not differe3
Value
below 40 kg N/hae3
Comparator
conventionally split fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single N application either broadcast or placed on the soil surface was compared to conventionally split fertilization for winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–304 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inorganic N in the soil profile after harvest was generally below 40 kg N/ha and did not differ between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–919 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Where N was placed, mineral N was depleted during the vegetation period of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N was placede4
Outcome
mineral Ne4
Direction
depletede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single N application either broadcast or placed on the soil surface was compared to conventionally split fertilization for winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–304 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the area where N was placed, mineral N was depleted during the vegetation period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1004 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A single N application between tillering and stem elongation was sufficient to achieve high yield and quality of winter wheat at the experimental sites.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume5
Treatment
single N application in the period between tillering and stem elongatione5
Outcome
high yield and qualitye5
Qualifier
independent of the method of application or the type of fertilizere6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“At the experimental sites a single N application in the period between tillering and stem elongation was sufficient to achieve high yield and quality of winter wheat without increased risk of nitrate leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1214 · show in text ↑
e6

“This finding was independent of the method of application or the type of fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1299 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A single N application between tillering and stem elongation of winter wheat did not increase the risk of nitrate leaching.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume5
Treatment
single N application in the period between tillering and stem elongatione5
Outcome
risk of nitrate leachinge5
Qualifier
without increasede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“At the experimental sites a single N application in the period between tillering and stem elongation was sufficient to achieve high yield and quality of winter wheat without increased risk of nitrate leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1214 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 400 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.